The Place of Philosophy in the Theological Curriculum [pp. 103-124]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

THE PRINCE TON RE VIE W. scious intelligence, we may well ask if the theists with their belief in one personal God are not in possession of the only hypothesis that can save the language of these writers from the charge of meaningless and idiotic raving. And it is easy to see how large an area of polemic the theistic discussion involves; for not only are objections to be answered, but rival theories of the universe are to be examined. There is the system of pantheism, which organizes the phenomenal world under the conception of God and denies the separate personality and freedom of finite minds. There is the system that does not get outside of the phenomenal self, and so finds its creed shrivelling into a barren agnosticism. And there is, finally, a system that undertakes to articulate the phenomenal universe in the terms of matter, and ends in giving us not only a mechanical world without, but a mechanical mind within. It ends in automatism. It ends in explaining the music of Beethoven, the painting of Raphael, the sculpture of Thorwaldsen, and the cathedral monument of Sir Christopher Wren as the purposeless play of blind material atoms. And when it does this it commits suicide. When mind is reduced to automatism, schism is introduced into our conscious life. You cannot, as Professor Herbert has so ably shown, take intentionality out of matter without taking it out of mind. The materialist cannot help purposing; he cannot help believing that his actions are the realization of purpose; and yet purpose is a word for which his theory of the universe has no use and which it cannot explain. "Consistent materialism," says Mr. Green, "should be speechless." And Mr. Green is right. Consistent materialism is egoism. The self is the solitary tenant of a lone universe. It has no logical right to call any other self its companion, for of that other self it has no knowledge. The soul is a caged bird. It is the function of a true theory of Knowing and Being to open the doors of that gilded cage, and when this is done, with little help from us, but under the irresistible tendency of an instinct born in heaven, this poor, pining, imprisoned thing will fly away to God. Nor must we overlook the fact that the atheism of to-day is possessed of great industry and intellectual activity. Remem I20

/ 364
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 117-126 Image - Page 120 Plain Text - Page 120

About this Item

Title
The Place of Philosophy in the Theological Curriculum [pp. 103-124]
Author
Patton, Francis L.
Canvas
Page 120
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, 1882

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.009/124:8

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.009

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Place of Philosophy in the Theological Curriculum [pp. 103-124]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.009. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.