Some Difficulties of Modern Materialism [pp. 344-372]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

THE PRINCETON RE VIEW. false. By hypothesis all of those thoughts which collide with materialism are false. In particular, the notions of right and wrong and freedom and all religious beliefs are pure fictions, by hypothesis, of course. Throughout the world-process there is a strong and almost overwhelming tendency to dream and falsehood; and but for a few advanced thoughts, error would have reigned supreme. Sadly enough, also, whether these advanced thoughts shall hold their own depends in no way upon their truth, but upon the nerves. Beliefs too are seen to be changing. This fact in itself is insignificant, but it is important in its implications. Each belief is the inner side of a nervous state; and a change in one points to a change in the other. What direction the nervous states will take in the future is not clear. It is highly improbable that the evolution philosophy is itself the only philosophy which is exempt from the law of evolution. We must expect that sooner or later all things and opinions will pass, the evolution dogma among the rest. The outlook upon practice is equally suggestive. Hitherto action has been under the influence of those nervous states which have God, freedom, and righteousness for their inner face. It is.not sure what it will be when they are displaced by opposite nervous states. History and experience are not without their suggestions; and theory points to a reversal of current principles of action. If it were simply a matter of opinion, it would be immaterial; but as it is a matter of profound changes in the nerves, a change of some kind must result. There is no telling what horrors the nerves may have in store. Of course in this language there is an implicit assumption of freedom, but it is in the language only. We expressly disclaim all power to order our thoughts, to criticise, to draw conclusions, or to resign ourselves to the inevitable. Plainly this result logically cancels all further inquiry. If there were a mind able to grasp the theory and its consequences, it would declare that the mind can be only a passive spectator of the nervous unfolding. But of course there is no spectator, passive or otherwise. The advanced thinker himself vanishes into advanced thoughts. The nerves are all and in all. The preparation of this paper has been attended by some thoughts; but that thought at most was only the sign to 370

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 367-376 Image - Page 370 Plain Text - Page 370

About this Item

Title
Some Difficulties of Modern Materialism [pp. 344-372]
Author
Bowne, Prof. Borden P.
Canvas
Page 370
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/374:19

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Some Difficulties of Modern Materialism [pp. 344-372]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.