On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

2THE PRZVCE TON RE VIEW. of language of which I wish specially to speak. The process is this: Some strictly technical word is taken, some word which, in some other language, most likely in some distant age and coun try, had a very distinct and technical meaning. It is used per haps, first of all, consciously as a figure, with a direct allusion to its original meaning. It is applied to something which has some kind of relation to its original meaning, to something which the reference to its original meaning really illustrates. As a figure, used once for all, it is very likely really in place; its application is very likely both apposite and ingenious. Only it is safer not to make such applications, unless we are quite sure that they will never be made again. For the chances are that the word will be caught up by some one who does not understand the force of the original allusion. It is to him simply a new word, a foreign word, perhaps a long and grand-sounding word, which he thinks it fine to drag into his talk, without any thought whatever of its real meaning. Step by step others receive the new word as a fine word; it passes into the received dialect of those who love to use fine words. It is no longer tsed as a figure or an allusion; all thought of its origin and history has passed away. The word is used simply as being finer, and withal vaguer, than the common word to whose meaning it comes nearest. The common word has a sharp, definite meaning which everybody understands. There is no metaphor, no vagueness, no haziness, about it; it is simply the name for the thing, and that is all. The common word is therefore used by those who know what they mean and who mean what they say, and who wish every one to know what they do mean. But the word which once was a metaphor, but which has ceased to be one, does not in the same way ever become the simple name of the thing in the same way as the common English word. The point of the metaphor has wholly passed away, but the once metaphorical expression still keeps about it a good deal of the vagueness and haziness of its metaphorical days. It is theref6re used by all those classes of speakers for whose ends fine words, hazy words, pay. It is used by those who wish to conceal their meaning, by those who know that they have no meaning to conceal, and those who are fumbling about for a meaning 254

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 247-256 Image - Page 254 Plain Text - Page 254

About this Item

Title
On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]
Author
Freeman, Edward A., D. C. L.
Canvas
Page 254
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/258:14

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.