On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

ONV CER TAIN AB USES IN LA,NGUA GE. practical evils in a sense in which no mere fault of style is. And they often, moreover, lead to practical evils in a yet more distinct sense, if, as is very likely to happen, confusions in speech and misconceptions in thought lead directly to practical errors of conduct. I will begin with some cases which are mere questions of taste, where the error, if any, is a mere error of style; from thence I will go up to the cases where I believe that real practical errors have come of the misuse, the vague and inaccurate use, of language. I am not now directly pleading the cause of the native English tongue against foreign intrusion. I believe I am doing so indirectly; but it is only indirectly. I am not pleading for Teutonic words as such against Romance words as such. I am pleading for whatever words give the clearest and most accurate idea. I believe that, where you have the choice between the two, the Teutonic word will commonly be found to give the clearest and most accurate idea. But, in any case where it is not so, I say for my present purpose-indeed I should say at all times-use the Romance word without doubting. In speaking of these matters, I have always pleaded for the Teutonic word against the Romance, whenever there is a real choice between them. Bur I have always admitted that there are many cases where there is no real choice in the matter. I have always been for getting rid of Romance words wherever they can be got rid of; but I have always kept the fact in sight that there are many cases in which they cannot be got rid of. First of all, there are those words, some of which come directly from Latin, some from Old-French, which came in so early as to be thoroughly naturalized, and which have altogether put on the outward shape of English words. Secondly, there is the great fact that we have so largely lost the power of coining words in our own tongue that we are constantly driven to use Romance words for any purposes which are at all technical or abstract. My own rule is, as far as may be, to look at Romance words of the second class-words whose shape and endings show them at first sight to be Romance-strictly as technical terms. I hold that they should be used freely wherever they are really needed in their strict and accurate sense, 25r

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 247-256 Image - Page 251 Plain Text - Page 251

About this Item

Title
On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]
Author
Freeman, Edward A., D. C. L.
Canvas
Page 251
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/255:14

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"On Certain Abuses in Language [pp. 248-272]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.