The Historical Proofs of Christianity [pp. 223-247]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

THE PRINCETON RE VIE W. passages, that the age of miracles had gone by and that their own times were in marked contrast, in this respect, with the era of the apostles. 3. The miracles related by the Fathers are mostly exorcisms, the healing of the sick, and visions-that is, occurrences where natural agencies are most easily mistaken for supernatural. Miracles, in which this error is impossible, lack sufficient attestation. The true view on this subject appears to be that miraculous manifestations in the Church ceased gradually. No sharp line of demarcation can be drawn marking off the age of miracles from the subsequent period when the operation of the divine Providence and Spirit was no longer palpably distinguished from the movements of natural law. As we advance into the fourth century, called the Nicene age, we meet with a notable increase in the number of alleged miracles. Yet Chrysostom, Ambrose, Augustine, speak of the apostolic age as distinguished from their own as having been a period marked by miracles. Notwithstanding the high merits of the authors of the Nicene era, they discover more and more the artificial rhetorical tone which had now come to infest literature. There was a habit of thought and style which tends to breed exaggeration. It was a period of decadence. Relicworship, the invocation of martyrs and saints, and like superstitions, established themselves in the Church, and the alleged miracles were frequently associated with these customs. A spirit of credulity gained ground. Moreover, an examination of the miracles described by Augustine shows how little reason there was to assume a supernatural agency in these cases. For example, instances of healing are given which are now known to result not unfrequently from natural causes. Other supposed miracles of a more portentous character rest upon no testimony which is of any value. The evidence for most of the post-apostolic miracles which the Fathers advert to melts away on examination. The standing argument at the present day against the credibility of the evangelists is the precedent afforded by the biographers of "the saints," and of the incredible marvels which they mingle with authentic history. To some it is no matter of 242

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 237-246 Image - Page 242 Plain Text - Page 242

About this Item

Title
The Historical Proofs of Christianity [pp. 223-247]
Author
Fisher, George P., D. D., LL. D.
Canvas
Page 242
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/246:13

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Historical Proofs of Christianity [pp. 223-247]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.