Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

ASSASSIVATIO2V AND THE SPOILS SYSTEM. equally friendly to liberty and the just limitation of party activity, whether practically or philosophically interpreted. Whatever strength and honor a party may gain by supporting sound principles, by enacting wise laws, by placing worthy men in office, by enforcing pure and vigorous administrationall that it has free opportunity to attain under the true methods of our Constitution. But they are repugnant to a spoils system of administration. They forbid the use of public authority for party despotism. Aaron Burr laid the foundations of the spoils system, and as early as I820 De Witt Clinton complained of the interference ,of Custom House officials with New York elections. That system very early made New York politics more corrupt and proscriptive than the politics of any other state-a distinction they have never lost. Brooding over his presidential prospects, General Jackson said to a New Yorker, "I am no politician, but if I were a politician I would be a New York politician." Van Buren made him a New York politician. The election of Jackson, inspired by Burr, was the work of Van Buren. Potent in Tammany Hall, and the autocrat of the Albany Regency, Van Buren carried the spoils system into the National Senate in I82I and extended it to the executive departments when Jackson's Secretary of State. He enforced it while Vice-President and President from i832 to I840. It was a ground of attack upon him in his own State, and of his rejection as minister to England in I832, that he had brought that infamous system to Washington. Its spirit is best declared in this language of Senator Marcy of New York in the debate on Van Buren's rejection-the only public defence of the system we believe ever made: "When they [the New York politicians] are contending for victory, they avow -the intention of enjoying the fruits of it. If they are defeated, they expect to retire from office. If they are successful, they claim as matter of right the advantages of success. They see nothing wrong in the rule that to the victor belong the spoils of the enemy." Parties, therefore, according to the New York spoils-system code, are hostile camps, under military discipline, forever engaged, not in peaceful controversies about principles, but in deadly conflicts for offices, contracts, and all the spoils incident I55

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 147-156 Image - Page 155 Plain Text - Page 155

About this Item

Title
Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B., Esq.
Canvas
Page 155
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/159:9

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.