Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

THE PRINCE 7'0N RE VIEW. pay for needless servants to work for his partner, or to pay for the same needless servants to work for his party. The fact that so few people see the matter in this light but illustrates the blinding and demoralizing effects of our partisan methods and our neglect of administrative affairs. Among the reasons for the careful separation of legislative from executive departments in the Constitution, none are more important than those: on the side of legislation, that members of Congress may have the independence and courage needed for dealing fearlessly and thoroughly with all abuses in the executive department, for holding every official to a strict account as the Constitution contemplates, and also the time and disinterestedness essential for considering and maturing sound measures of legislation touching a vast variety of interests on which the prosperity of a nation depends; and, on the side of the Executive, that he may have the independence and courage essential for the selection, discipline (and for removals, as the public interest may require) of that great number of officials through whom his high trust of seeing that the laws are faithfully executed is discharged, and also that every one of those officials may feel a direct and undivided responsibility to.the Executive, without which all unity and rigor of administration are impossible. And it needs no proof from our sad experience to make it plain that nothing can be more fatal to such objects than a mingling and barter of the functions of these departments, sure to lead to appointments, enactments, and appropriations being pledged and made as conditions of each other, to confirmations by Senators being based on legislation promised for their States, to economy forborne lest the appointees of members of Congress should lose their places or their salaries, to incompetent appointments made to please legislators, to executive authority defied by subordinates under guarantee of protection by members of Congress. In the Constitution itself there is a great departure from this principle of separation of functions, which, even without the aid of a spoils system, tends to such abuses, so far as the Senate is concerned. For, altho the duty of selecting officials is emphatically executive, and the President is to nominate, the Senate is to confirm many of the higher officials before the appointment is completed. It was the intention, and in general the I50

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 147-156 Image - Page 150 Plain Text - Page 150

About this Item

Title
Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]
Author
Eaton, Dorman B., Esq.
Canvas
Page 150
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/154:9

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Assassination and the Spoils System [pp. 145-170]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.