Anthropomorphism [pp. 120-144]

The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

THE PRINCE TON RE VIEW. Still, the question remains whether this argument from rela tivity, tho evidently fatal to the metaphysics of evolution, be not equally fatal to Christianity. May it not be that all knowledge is impossible, and all science a dream? Or, to bring the ques tion down to the specific problem under discussion, have we any right, knowing the relativity of our own thought-products, to assert that God is a Person who thinks and feels and wills? In answer'to this question I can only sketch, very briefly, the outline of an argument which I believe can be defended as the science of the Christian faith in an intelligent deity, so far as that faith is affected by the principle of the relativity of human knowledge. It is essentially the position of all Christian scholarship. If all truth be relative, conditioned by the finite, subjective forms of thought under which we, as human minds, are forever compelled to express thought, then it certainly is no objection to any particular truth that it comes to us under those forms. If, for example, manifestations of matter are such that, by the structure of our minds, we are forever compelled to think of it as extended, then matter is extended to us, and that is all the reality which we require. In fact, reality itself is a thought of the human mind. Matter is to us extended, and it is for all eternity no concern of ours what matter might be to us if we were not ourselves. Now, if the manifestations of God are such that, by the structure of our minds, we are forever compelled to think of him as Mind, with intellect, feeling, and will, then God is to us Mind, with intellect, feelirig, and will. This is the finite form under which we finite creatures must think him; and it is for all eter. nity no concern of ours what God might be to us if we were not ourselves. God undoubtedly is, in his essence, an Unknown and Unknowable Something infinitely beyond the reach of finite mind. The essence of matter is likewise forever unknowable to us. To assert the contrary is simply to assert that we can think without thinking, which is absurd. So far as this goes, we are all agnostics. But beyond this it is equally certain that this Something, God, Unknowable in essence, has manifested itself to us. As finite minds we must think those manifestations and the great 142

/ 428
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 137-146 Image - Page 142 Plain Text - Page 142

About this Item

Title
Anthropomorphism [pp. 120-144]
Author
Phelps, M. Stuart, Ph. D.
Canvas
Page 142
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 2, 1881

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.3-01.008/146:8

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.3-01.008

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Anthropomorphism [pp. 120-144]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.3-01.008. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.