Rhetorical Science [pp. 660-678]

The Princeton review. / Volume 3, Issue 12

IRHETORICAL SCIENCE. that immediately followed. It is a matter of no slight significance, that in the very best periods of the ancient and modern mind, this science has held its most conspicuous position. Although in the course of the eighteenth century it was tem. porarily under a cloud, by reason of a false conception of its nature, this was against the earnest protest of the best minds of England. It was soon reinstated upon a better basis under the leadership of Campbell and Whately. With these names the history of the science as modern dates its origin. Its present clearest philosophical expression in this country is in the volumes of Professor Day, and though the nature of the science is yet somewhat in dispute, it is still regarded as indispensable in our courses of instruction. In such a posture of things there is something very significant and critical. We feel that this whole department is on trial, and that there is an urgent call for a critical inquiry into its nature, and this not merely in its relations to secular, but to ministerial education, of which Sacred Rhetoric, applied to preaching, is so important an element. In regard to the science and the art called Rhetoric, then let us inquire what is its Nature, Sphere and Object in our culture, and what are its Relations to Literature? (I.) Yctttre, including Sphere and Object. "We may lay it down as a general rule," says Dr. Shedd, "that in proportion as a product is living in its nature, and takes its origin in the more spontaneous agencies of the mind, so will it be difficult of definition. Like the definition of life itself, the definition of poetry, art and eloquence must be an approximation only." It is thus that the great multitude of definitions which have been given on this subject, instead of being derogatory to it, as Quintilian asserts, are seen to be highly complimentary, the natural outreaching of the human mind after a concise declaration of its thought. Passing by the opinions of the ancient world, as sufficiently familiar, we find Milton speaking of Rhetoric as "an organic art," the organ or instrument of expression. Says Bacon: " Its office is to apply the reason to imagination, for the better moving of the will." Says D'Alembert: "It is the ability to cause a sentiment with which the mind is deeply pen etrated, to pass with rapidity into the souls of others, and im press itself there with force and energy," in keeping with which 42 1874.] 661

/ 188
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 661-670 Image - Page 661 Plain Text - Page 661

About this Item

Title
Rhetorical Science [pp. 660-678]
Author
Hunt, Rev. Theodore
Canvas
Page 661
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 3, Issue 12

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-03.012
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.2-03.012/661:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.2-03.012

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Rhetorical Science [pp. 660-678]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-03.012. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.