Bishop Hefele on Pope Honorius [pp. 273-301]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, Issue 2

1872.1 VON HEFELE ON POPE HONORIUS. 291 Se~oud bivision. THE ATTEMPTS TO EXPLAIN AWAY THE FACTS. Various attempts have been made by different writers to diminish as far as possible the pressure of these facts and argum cuts. 1. The Roman abbot, Johannes, who as scribe wrote the epistle of Honorius to Sergius, asserted in his letters to the Greek Emperor, Constantine Heraclius, that "in that epistle of Honorius nothing at all is said of the d~vine will in Christ, but Honorius meant to deny that Christ had a sinful human will, and to assert that he had only a good human will. Tiiis last is the one will of which Honorius is speaking; he says nothing about the divine will, because he only replle~ to the question of Sergius." (See Mansi, Collect. Concil. vol. x. p. 739.) In the same way John IV., the second successor of Honorius, endeavored to defend him. (Mansi, as above, p. 682.) a. But this allegation is simply not true, as Sergius expressly says: "The phrase t?VO energies gave offense, because it led to the conclusion that we must ascribe to Christ two antagonistic wills, a DIvINE, which was willing to suffer, and a human, which was opposed to suffering." (Mansi, vol. xi. p. 534.) I only ask, is Sergius here speaking of two sorts of will in the human nature, or of the human and divine will? So that it is a vain and false expedient on the part of Abbot Johannes to assert that Honorius had nothing to say of the divine will, because Sergius did not a~lude to it. b. It is true that Hon onus denies that there was in Christ a sinful human will, and in this he is right; but instead of going on and saying-" consequently there remains in the human nature of Christ only the good human will, and this is ever conformed to the will of the divine nahire"-he makes a leap and says, "consequently there is only one will in Christ," and by this he means the divine-as appears from the following: Honorius thinks that when Christ says, "Not my will, but thine, be done," he is not speaking in a strict personal sense,

/ 224
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 285-294 Image - Page 291 Plain Text - Page 291

About this Item

Title
Bishop Hefele on Pope Honorius [pp. 273-301]
Author
Smith, Henry B., D. D.
Canvas
Page 291
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-01.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.2-01.002/287:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.2-01.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Bishop Hefele on Pope Honorius [pp. 273-301]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-01.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.