The Eldership Question [pp. 231-246]

The Princeton review. / Volume 1, Issue 2

242 TIlE ELDERSHIP QUESTION. [ApriT,, The only authority the unlimited election has from our' Book, is the acknowledged fact, that the framers of the Constitution found it "approved and in use," in many, perhaps most of the congregations, and threw over it the sanction of the organic Law as one "mode approved ~nd in use." Sec. VI. has been quoted as affirming the doctrine that the election must be for life. But Sec. VI. says nothingabout the election of elders. It defines "the office," and not the tenure of it; for itself provides for the incumbent ceasing to act It applies equally whether the elder were elected with or without limit, as to the term of service. Our Sec. VI. is borrowed very literally from Chap. VI of the Second Book of Discipline, which reads: "T~eir o~ce, as it is ordinary so`it %8 perpetual, and always necessary in the kirk of God. The eldership is a spiritual function, as is the' ministry. ~ldcr~ once lawfully called to tI~e o~ce, and having gifts from God meet to receive the same, may not leave it again." Our Sec. VI. reads, "The offices of Ruling Elder and of Deacon are bothper~ctual,* and cannot be laid aside at' rleasnre. No person can be divested of either o~ce but by deposition." The later Act must be interpreted by the usage and decisions under the older. But the men who framed' and adopted the Second Book of Discipline, held that "their' election shall be yearly, where it may be conveniently observed." The rest of Sec. VI., and the whole of Section VII., point out the way in which an elder may demit the duties of his office, or be removed from it. They say nothing as to the term of his election, or of his service. They show that one may divest himself, or be divested of the duties of the office, and "cease to be an acting elder." Whatever incongruity may be supposed to exist, in electing one for a term of years, to an "office " which is "perpetual, and cannot be laid aside at pleasure," the same exists in the provision by which one, elected for an unlimited tenure, may divest himself of it in the contingency of his "becoming un — acceptable, in his official character, to a majority of the con — * See also Chap~ III. So~. II: "The perpetual officers," &c.

/ 224
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 235-244 Image - Page 242 Plain Text - Page 242

About this Item

Title
The Eldership Question [pp. 231-246]
Author
Moore, Rev. William E., D. D.
Canvas
Page 242
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 1, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-01.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.2-01.002/238:2

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.2-01.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Eldership Question [pp. 231-246]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.2-01.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.