Future Retribution. By Rev. George S. Mott [pp. 532-554]

The Princeton review. / Volume 43, Issue 4

Fu.ture Retribution. Bible as a self-consistent whole, it will begin to die. Texts of Scripture, says Donne, are like the hairs in a horse's tail. Unite them, and they concur in one root of strength and beauty; but take them separately, and they can be used only as snares and springs to catch woodcocks." And now we summon infidelity to render its interpretation on what God's Word teaches as to future retribution. In 1858 Theodore Parker, in a letter to Rev. Dr. Adams, of Boston, wrote these lines: "To me it is quite clear that Jesus taught the doctrine of eternal damnation, if the Evangelists-the first three, I mean-are to be treated as inspired. I can understand his language in no other way. But as the Protestant sects start with the notion-which to me is a monstrous one-that the words of the New Testament are all miraculously inspired by God, and so infallibly true; and as this doctrine of eternal damnation is so revolting to all the humane and moral feelings of our nature, men said,'the words must be interpreted in another way.' So as the Unitarians have misinterpreted the New Testament to prove that the Christos of the fourth Gospel had no pre-existence, the UTniversalists misinterpreted other passages of the Gospels to show that Jesus of Nazareth never taught eternal damnation." Says another distinguished advocate of final restoration: "And yet I freely say that I do not find the doctrine of the ultimate salvation of all souls clearly stated in any text, or in any discourse that has ever been reported from the lips of Christ. I do not think that we can fairly maintain that the final restoration of all men is a prominent and explicit'doctrine of the four Gospels.* Renan admits that "Paradise and Gehenna shall have no end." Thomas Paine and other infidels have made similar concessions, admit ting that the New Testament does teach the doctrine of eter nal future punishment. In contemplating this theme pious men have shrunk frorn this terrible conclusion, and some have hoped there mighlt be a reprieve; but have confessed they could discover no warrant for it from the Bible. The sentiments of many find expression in the words of Mr. Beecher, in the sermon on "Future Pun * T. S. King's Two Discour8es, p. 5. Quoted in Great Concern, by Dr. Adams. 1871.] 549

/ 168
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 543-552 Image - Page 549 Plain Text - Page 549

About this Item

Title
Future Retribution. By Rev. George S. Mott [pp. 532-554]
Canvas
Page 549
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 43, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-43.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-43.004/553:3

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-43.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Future Retribution. By Rev. George S. Mott [pp. 532-554]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-43.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.