A Phase of the Church Question. [pp. 566-586]

The Princeton review. / Volume 42, Issue 4

IS7~.] T1~6 C1~?6~'C1~ Quc8~ioTh. peculiar exposition of which is founded t}iis private judgment scheme. To base an "idea or theory" of the Ecelesia npon what tlie Greek fathers tangl~t, rather than to accept the ~ord of C1~rist, may be the work of a speculatist. No such theorizing can have any weight with those who prefer to follow Christ rather than to put confidence in men. It is nseless for Dr. Nevin to affirm that il~e creed defines the idea. Theological writers of all ages-P~oman, Greek, and Protestant-admit that there is O~~e JT)ly C/~ri~tiam Ck~~rck. It is no less certain that this Ecelesia has always been regarded as the aj~~re~a~J assembly of the saints. The notion of an CAurc~ finds no authority iii a word or phrase uttered by the Saviour. ~Vhat is equally remarkable is the fact, that this abstract notion can find no foundation in history. It is not a question, therefore, whether il~e "idea or theory" entertained by Dr. Nevin may be received. llistory says: ~O. Aj~rivaPj~~(I~?~6flt scheme, no matter how profoundly philosophical, can have no right, considered historically, to either respcct or confidence. T}~ere is only ome truly primitive idea of the Lcclesia. The so-callcd fathers, whether Greek or P~oman, mQy entertain whatever notion, idea, or theory they choose. The notions, ideas, or theories may be ancient: they are not primitive. Dr. Nevin, in company with P~omanists, Greco-Romanists, Anglo-P~om anists, and all other advocates of a human "idea or theory" may accept as normal what is simply ancient. True Protestantism accepts only the PRIMITIVE CREED. The Saviour speaks through his Apostles, of the Ecelesia as "t1~c ~iu1ti1uJe of t~em t4at be~cve." This multitude is said to increase. "And t~e lord added dai(j~ to t4e C/~urc1~ c8 8Aon~d be saved." llere is the primitive idea of the Christian Church: it is the Asseiubiy of t7~e saimts. Augustine says: "The Church consists of the faithful dispersed throughout the woAd." No other idea was known in the days of the Apostles: the Saviour teaches no other. This Leclesia is founded upon a trulypersoma1fait~. Of this faith tiie Saviour says: " O'?t tkis rook Jwii~fo~u~d ~ny Ckuro/~." Dr. Nevin does not distinguish between a personal faith, as a living reality, and a formal faith. The so-called Apostles'

/ 160
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 559-568 Image - Page 567 Plain Text - Page 567

About this Item

Title
A Phase of the Church Question. [pp. 566-586]
Canvas
Page 567
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 42, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-42.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-42.004/571:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-42.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"A Phase of the Church Question. [pp. 566-586]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-42.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.