Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]

The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

660 rr. ~eorye 1)uffleld on tTte [Oc~o~~~ itself sinful. This view New-school Presbyterians cou]d not reconcile with the fact, as affirmed by the Confession of Faith, that God is not the author of sin, nor with the nature of God's moral government, the freedom of the human will, and the accountability of the moral creature. "The Old-school Presbyterians, on the other hand, charged their brethren who dissented from their theological ideas as to the nature of moral corruption, with denying that`Adam's posterity inherit from him a depraved nature,' and also`that there is any such thing as`a corrupted natme,' distinct froni voluntary acts. The ground of controversy here lies in a terra inco~nita. New-sc/tool ~resbyterians care not to expThre it." Pp. 587, 58~. "If Old-school Presbyterians do not believe that the agency of the Spirit in regeneration is physical, like that of his physical omnipotence in creation, they have failed to make themselves understood. ~Ye confess ourselves utterly unable to get any other idea from such language as this:`the formal efficiency of the Spirit, indeed, in the putting forth the exceeding greatness of his power in our quickening, is no otherwise to be comprehended by us than any other creating act of Divine power.`* Dr. Rice, the exponent of Old-school views, insists upon there being`a moral nature or disposition, distinct and anterior to its acts,' produced, of course, by a new creation,`so that the regenerated man is, in his moral character, as really a new creature as he would be in his physical character, if the natural powers of his mind were radically changed.'" Pp. 605, 60(3. Thus it is avowed that New-school Presbyterians regard our doctrine of native ~and hereditary sinfulness, as, "if not physical, in wrought or involved in his constitutional nature, transmitted like any otlter corporeal facult~ or ~ualit~," so reducing it to the genus of "corporeal faculties or qualities," and making it a part of man's original and essential nature. They ignore, and "do not care to" know anything about depraved nature inherited from Adam, or distinct from voluntary acts. To say that this is terra incognita to them, is to say that they disbelieve it, and do not hold it. ~Ioreover it shows that their meaning of the word "physical" when they * Owen on the Spirit, book iii., chap. i. p. 225.

/ 144
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 657-666 Image - Page 660 Plain Text - Page 660

About this Item

Title
Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]
Canvas
Page 660
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-39.004/664:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-39.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.