Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]

The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

658 ~r. ~eor~qe Puffield on t~e [OcTo3ER as taught in our Confession, and held by Old-school Presbyterians, they stigmatize it as a doctrine of physical depravity, inherent in our constitution, faculties, nature, as created by ~od. And they denounce the correlate doctrine logically flowing from this, and taught in the Bible and our standards, ~iz., that regeneration is the removal of this corrupt principle, ~nd the implantation of a new principle of life and holiness, as "physical" regeneration, a change in the constitutional faculties, &c.; also as being wrought by the exercise of God's mere "physical" omnipotence. Of this evidence enough will appear as we proceed. Now, for our present purpose, it is sufficient to observe, that the word "nature," ~6acc, and, perhaps, in a less degree, the word "constitution," as related to these subjects, is used i~ a threefold sense. First, for human nature unfallen as it came from the hands of God in the creation of our first parents. Secondly, for that nature as fallen and morally corrupted in the fall of our first parents. Thirdly, for those essential faculties and properties which belong to man as such, whether fallen or unfallen, in the absence of which he is no longer man. Now when our Confession and Old-school divines speak of "corrupted nature," or "principle," and use other like phrases, they mean it not in the first or third, but the second of these meanings. And they hold that there is such a sinful vitiosity of nature derived from the fall of the first man to all descending from him by ordinary generation; which nothing but the Almighty power of God can remove in regeneration. Herein — they follow the Scriptures, which declare that we are "by nature, ~i~7"SC, children of wrath;" meaning thereby not our original nature as made upright by God, nor yet the essence of human nature as it exists in man fallen and unfallen: but nature as corrupted by the fall, and dead in sin. Since the English word "physical" is a derivative from the Greek ~6~(C, so the older Calvinistic divines have applied it to our original moral depravity, or inborn sinful dispositions, to indic~fr that they are by nature, ~6a~, and not merely acquired, nor mere acts. In like manner, they used the word with reference to regeneration, to signify that it is a change of this nature, ~u'oc~ ]yi~g back of acts, whereby we are children of wrath;

/ 144
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 657-666 Image - Page 658 Plain Text - Page 658

About this Item

Title
Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]
Canvas
Page 658
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-39.004/662:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-39.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dr. George Duffield on the Doctrines of New-School Presbyterians [pp. 655-675]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.