The Queen's English vs The Dean's English [pp. 558-585]

The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

584 TI~e Queen's r~~iI~~ vs. [OCTOBER rudis indigestaque moles; his Plea for the Queen's English exhibits proofs of his want of qualification for the office he has assumed. LIe discards the "so-called universal rules of English," and tells his young readers, "the less ~ou know of them, the less you turn your words right or left to observe them, the better." Yet in deference to Mr. Moon's criticisms and in obedience to these rules he has changed nearly thirty passages.* We promised to give proofs of the Dean's errors in grammar and in rhetoric; we have not space to notice them at length. We had noted a considerable number, but must refer our readers to Mr. Gould, who gives a list of nearly sixty errors of greater or less importance.t Every one who has had even a superficial acquaintance with our schools and colleges knows that scarcely any branch of education is more neglected than the study of our vernacular tongue. Young men can neither spell correctly nor write grammatically, and the deficien~y is as great and the evil is as crying in this department as in the classical instruction of many of our schools and academies. It is taken for granted that men will know how to spell and to write their own langunge without any instruction. Not in America only is this the case, but in England also, where there are loud complaints about the neglect of the study of their own language and literature. Not only are degrees conferred upon men who cannot translate their diplomas; but Senior Wranglers, First Classmen, and others,go forth from tlie universities with the ability to write faultless Latin prose or perfect Greek Iambics, while they are unable to write even a letter in grammatical English. More attention is paid to the subject of English composition in the colleges of this country than in those of England, but it is impossible for them to remedy the deficiencies of the earlier stages of education. The thorough study of the classical languages need not interfere with attention to our own in the academy, and every college should have a Chair of the English Language and Literature. Hear the conclusion of the whole matter. We should correct oflr own mistakes if we are to instruct others with authority; * See The Dean's English, p. 126, sqq. f See Good English, p. 132, sqq.

/ 144
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 577-586 Image - Page 584 Plain Text - Page 584

About this Item

Title
The Queen's English vs The Dean's English [pp. 558-585]
Canvas
Page 584
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 39, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-39.004/588:2

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-39.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Queen's English vs The Dean's English [pp. 558-585]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-39.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.