Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]

The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Theory of the Eldership. the sacred office of the ministry." Gieseler rejects the distinction made by this theory. Mosheim does the same. Dr. Coleman and Riddle, in their "Antiquities of the Christian Church," founded upon Augusti and others, declare against this theory. Selden and Lightfoot, the greatest Hebraists of modern times, were against it in the Westminster Assembly. Vitringa, to whom all our knowledge of the synagogue is now chiefly referred, expresses himself in the most unqualified manner. "I am not," he says, "opposed to lay elders, but contrariwise greatly like them. I will not, however, offend against the brotherhood, of which I form a part, if I openly declare that I am able to find no such elders in the apostolical church of the first age; none such in the church of the age following; none in the writings of the apostles, or in the records of the age following, as far as they have been examined by me or others. This opinion, in which I have long been fully confirmed, I consider it no fault freely to divulge, though contrary to that of others, and which no other reason or presumption than the force of truth has compelled me to embrace. And can any one then dare," he adds, "seriously to assert and to defend the position that to these lay elders the name of bishop, or the name of pastor, can be appropriated? And if no one can so dare, then the question is settled concerning them, since no other presbyters (or elders) are acknowledged or constituted in the church of the Apostles, except those who are at the same time pastors and bishops," &c.* Professor Jamieson, as referred to above, uses similar language: "I can't find," says he, "during the first three centuries express mention of these seniors or ruling elders; for I freely pass from (i. e. abandon) some words of Tertullian and Origen, which I elsewhere mentione(l as containing them, and so also from what I said of the Ignatian presbyters being ruling or non-preaching elders."t The very learned non-conformist writer, Clarkson, of whom Baxter says he was a man of "extraordinary worth for solid judgment and acquaintance with the Fathers," &c., coincides in this judgment, and so do many others.t * De Vet. Synag. p. 484. t Jamieson's Cyprianus Isotimus, p. 544. +t Primitive Episcop. pp. 92, 100, 104, 105. See others referred to in Bib. Repert. 1843, p. 327. 750 [OCTOBER

/ 208
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 747-756 Image - Page 750 Plain Text - Page 750

About this Item

Title
Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]
Canvas
Page 750
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-32.004/758:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-32.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.