Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]

The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Our Historical Name. here a chief bishop, or prelate ruling over his two inferior orders of clergy, so that while these were pastores gregis (pastors of the flock) he was pastor pastorum et gregis, (pastor of both pastors and flock,) as Charles I. was fond of saying. In every way, therefore, this passage is limited to ministers, who are, as all writers admit, (rpowz-wrec) presiding rulers, and hence this passage strengthens the similarly striking general concurrence in the interpretation of 1 Tim. v. 17. Our Historical Name. There is one other assumption in this theory, of which we desired to present a full historical refutation. It is, as stated by Dr. Adger, that "the distinction between bishops or elders who teach and rule, and bishops or elders who rule only.... gives us our name of the Presbyterian church-the church that holds to government by elders, the essence of whose office is ruling and not teaching." (See South. Presbyterian Review, p. 167, 1859.) Now this is contrary to fact, since elders are found in the Methodist, Lutheran, and-historically and constitutionally-in Congregational, Baptist, Independent, and, as Owen declares, in some form and name in every church in the world. This is also contrary to history. The name of Presbytery was given to our system by Beza, perhaps a century before the name of "ruling elders" was commonly given to these representatives of the people; before the distinction referred to was definitively made; while as yet the church had not either the wish nor the power to make the office a purely spiritual or permanent one; while the office was denominated by various names in different churches and countries; before the office was uniformly or universally adopted, or made obligatory; and, finally, before even the courts of the churches were generally called presbyteries. These positions might all be fully sustained. Presbytery, in its generic and historical meaning, is that system of polity of which the highest, the fundamental, and the absolutely essential officer is the presbyter, as opposed to prelate on the one hand, and to the people on the other. It is the presbyter who gives coherence, resistance, and attraction to VOL. XXXII.-NO. IV. 94 1860.] 737

/ 208
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 737-746 Image - Page 737 Plain Text - Page 737

About this Item

Title
Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]
Canvas
Page 737
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-32.004/745:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-32.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.