Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]

The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

1860.] Presbyters in the Synod of Jerusalem. byters-brethren," and therefore, "the apostles and elders, brethren were the only individuals officially concerned in this important transaction." (P. 85.) Now what are we to understand by all this? Plainly this, that in order to coerce Presbyterians at least, to admit the appellative meaning of the term presbyter, as including teaching and ruling presbyters, in this narrative,-to secure, we say, this theory, Congregationalists, Prelatists, Romanists, and latitudinarian critics, are to be employed to nullify the clearest possible delineation of representatives of the churches, sitting, deliberating, and deciding, in this model ecclesiastical court. But the labour is all lost. For, 1. The omission of "the brethren" in one verse does not expunge it from ten other passages in this chapter, nor the other expressions which are clearly expressive of special delegated office. 2. The reading in our authorized text is not abandoned, but maintained, by the best critics and the weightiest authorities. "The reading of some old manuscripts," says Baumgarten, and he is sustained by Dr. Alexander, and many more, "must, on closer examination, appear to be an intentional alteration which had its source in the prejudice that in these discussions and decrees none but the apostles were concerned."* 3. Romanists will lead to still further expurgation, and exclude, according to the reading attributed to Clement, both the words "presbyters and brethren."t 4. But let us adopt the reading of Dr. Killen, and it only follows that "presbyters" were co-equal and co-ordinate with apostles, and were therefore ministers and not "a mixed multitude" of different classes, and of whom some only ruled. 5. Dr. Killen, however, repudiates his own interpretation and reading. He calls these brethren "deputies commissioned to consult." "The conclusion," he says, "met the universal approval of the meeting, including the deputies on both sides." "The apostles and elders, with the whole church, send chosen men of their * Apost. Hist. vol. ii., p. 33. Alexander on Acts ii. 89. See also Griesbach, Bloomfield, Wordsworth, Tischendorf, Schaaf, Calvin, &c. It is sustained by Ebz., E. G., and H., and by the great body of the Cursive MSS., and by the Syriac, Coptic, and Ethiopic versions, and as Dr. Alexander says " commonly." t See Baumgarten, as above. 715

/ 208
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 707-716 Image - Page 715 Plain Text - Page 715

About this Item

Title
Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]
Canvas
Page 715
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-32.004/723:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-32.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.