Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]

The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Presbyters of the Synagogue. Vitringa has shown that there was no one constant form of synagogue government, but that it differed according to circumstances and places, and that of these various modifications the one adopted for the government of the Apostolic church was a Senatus plurium Doctorum qui quoddam (Consistorium sive Presbyterium constituerunt.* That the universal Jewish appellative term elders was given to some of their officers, sometimes to all, sometimes to a select number, may be admitted. But that any of these elders were invested with the clerical order is denied by Stillingfleett and others, while that the term elder was given in any other than the most general sense to those who did not preside and preach, is denied by perhaps all the original authorities. Vitringa is of this opinion, and establishes, he thinks clearly, that the term rendered by presbyter was properly employed by the Hebrew writers to designate "those who composed the sacred consistory of doctors or teachers. This consisted always of a plurality of these learned doctors, but the exact number depended on the size of the place, the number of such doctors convenient, and other circumstances."I Selden corroborates this judgment by proving, as he thinks, that the powers of presbyters, within and without the Holy Land, were different, and that the former combined teaching and ruling, while the latter had power to teach, to bind, to loose, to prophesy only, and were non in judieandi creati. He also teaches that just as in every large city there were many synagogues, so also there were many Christian churches and presbyters.~ The sum of what is admitted, so far as we can gather it, may be briefly stated as follows: 1. The elders of the synagogue represented the people, and "were laymen of reputed wisdom and experience, who, in practical matters, might be expected to give sound advice." (Dr. Killen's Ancient Church, p. 252.) They formed "a lay coun authorities are against him, and at no agreement among themselves, pp. 45, 46; or Killen's Ancient Church, p. 252. Vitringa exposes the views of Lightfoot, Selden, Petitus doctissimus, Capellus, &c. * See Book ii. Ch. xii., p. 592, &c. t See Dr. Miller on Eldership, pp. 45, 46. See Vet. Synag. Book iii. Ch. i. and Ch. xviii. p. 874. Selden de Synag. Vet. Ebraeorum vol. ii., lib. ii., ch. vii. pp. 329, 325, 252, 319, 320, etpassim. 1860.] 707

/ 208
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 707-716 Image - Page 707 Plain Text - Page 707

About this Item

Title
Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]
Canvas
Page 707
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-32.004/715:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-32.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Theory of the Eldership [pp. 702-759]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.