Reason and Faith [pp. 648-685]

The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Reason and Faith. Transcendental heresies, whether these hit the foe, or fall and explode with destructive effect in their own or a friendly camp. Worst of all, some of the mightiest men who have undertaken to grapple with this Kantean philosophy and its monstrous progeny, and have flattered themselves and others that they have vanquished it, give unequivocal signs of being in a mournful degree mastered by it. They have caught somewhat of the distemper in the attempt to cure it. They seem, scarcely knowing it, to be striving to inoculate philosophy and theology with the virus, for the purpose of fortifying them against it; as will yet more fully appear. Before proceeding to Mr. Mansel's great work, and the vigorous answer to it by Dr. Young, which will form the central topic of the observations we are about to offer, we wish briefly to characterize the treatise of Dr. McCosh. Some of its more particular statements relative to the great questions handled in Mr. Mansel's work, we hope to bring before our readers, when we come to the heart of our discussion. Dr. MIcCosh has won high rank among the Christian philosophers of our day by the works he has already published. His treatise on "The Divine Government, Physical and Moral," introduced him most favourably and widely to the notice of cultivated and thinking men in both hemispheres. His next work on "Typical Forms," &c. was welcomed by a narrower circle, because more scientific and technical. At the same time it was recognized as a valuable contribution to apologetics, and a confirmation of the author's high rank as a thinker. We rate the present work above either of its predecessors, alike as regards the ability it manifests, the difficulty of the questions elucidated, and the importance of the solutions, direct and indirect, which he offers to some of the great issues which now enlist the mind of the church. His works have the merit of speaking to living questions and meeting an existing desideratum. They touch apologetic theology at that point in which, for the time being, the enemies of the gospel are most successful in perplexing and annoying its friends. They deal with it, as it is impugned, obscured, or endangered by the scientists, metaphysicians, rationalists, and mystics of our day-in short, by whatever constitutes the prevalent "philosophy falsely so 650 [OCTOBER

/ 208
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 647-656 Image - Page 650 Plain Text - Page 650

About this Item

Title
Reason and Faith [pp. 648-685]
Author
McCosh, Rev. James
Canvas
Page 650
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 32, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-32.004/658:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-32.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Reason and Faith [pp. 648-685]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-32.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.