The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]

The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

The General Assembly. the Synod elect the Trustees. If, therefore, the Assembly elect annually the Directors of a Seminary, renewing the whole Board year by year, or as now, in the course of three years, the control would remain with the Assembly. A motion to this effect was presented by Dr. Murray to the previous Assembly, at the close of its sessions, but not discussed for want of time. There are grave considerations both for and against the proposed alteration, and it is desirable that the attention of the Church should be seriously turned to the subject before any decisive steps are taken in the matter. J,udicial Case. The Judicial Committee reported the case of the complaint of the Session of the church of Wooster, against a decision of the Synod of Ohio. The facts in this case appeared to be substantially these:Dr. Day, a member of the church at Wooster, having married a lady belonging to the Baptist denomination, their children, out of deference to her feelings, were not baptized. Notwithstanding this fact, Dr. Day was elected an elder in that congregation, and served in that capacity for some years. The Session of the church becoming dissatisfied with this state of things, presented the question in thesi to the Presbytery of Wooster, whether a man who neglected to present his children for baptism, ought to be permitted to act as a ruling elder in any of our churches. The Presbytery answered the question in the negative, and gave a deliverance on the importance of infant baptism. In consequence of this action of the Presbytery, Dr. Day resigned his office as elder, and his name was omitted from the roll of the Session. After a time, however, he wished to resume his office, and the Presbytery not having contemplated his special case in their action, recalled their deliverance on baptism, and ordered the Session to restore Dr. Day to the Session. The case being carried to the Synod of Ohio, the action of the Presbytery was sustained. From the Synod, it came by complaint to the Assembly. The Assembly sustained the complaint, and adopted the following minute as expressing their judgment in the premises: Whereas, It appears from the record that Dr. Day was re 1854.] 571

/ 184
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 569-578 Image - Page 571 Plain Text - Page 571

About this Item

Title
The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]
Canvas
Page 571
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-26.003/579:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-26.003

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.