The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]

The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

The General Assembly. mitted to the Board of Directors of the Seminary for publication; and that the remaining papers be approved and printed in the Appendix to the Minutes; that the charter granted by the Legislature of Kentucky be accepted by the General Assembly, and that the agreements between the General Assembly and the Synod of Kentucky, and the Centre College of Kentucky, be ratified by the General Assembly; and that the Committees on Endowment, and on charters, covenants, &c., be discharged, the latter having fully accomplished their work, and the unfinished part of the work of the former being hereby, according to their request, turned over to the Board of Trustees of the Seminary; and that a day be appointed by the General Assembly for the election of some suitable person as a professor in said Seminary, the Board of Directors being permitted, according to their suggestion, to retain the services of the Rev. Joseph G. Reasor as teacher of Oriental and Biblical Literature for the present, and for the election of suitable persons to the vacant places in the Board of Directors. When the usual motion was made to approve of the report of the Committee, the Rev. Dr. McMasters moved as an amendment, that the approval of the report should not be construed as expressing, in any way, any judgment of the Assembly unfavourable to the continued operation of the Seminary at New Albany. This amendment he sustained in an able and well digested speech, in which he endeavoured to show that the location of the Seminary at Danville was obtained at the last Assembly by an improper withholding of information, and by the unfair suppression of discussion. Dr. R. J. Breckinridge, with his usual ability successfully vindicated himself and the other friends of the Danville Seminary from the imputation of unfair suppression of information, or of freedom of debate. Dr. McMasters afterwards withdrew his amendment, with the understanding that it was to be subsequently presented as an independent proposition. The motion was then put and carried, to approve and adopt the report of the Committee on Seminaries, so far as it related to the Seminary at Danville. It was probably owing to an oversight, that the motion was made so comprehensive, and not limited to the approval of the annual report of the Board of Directors; as it was, the vote car 564 [JULY,

/ 184
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 559-568 Image - Page 564 Plain Text - Page 564

About this Item

Title
The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]
Canvas
Page 564
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-26.003/572:6

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-26.003

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The General Assembly [pp. 545-580]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.