The Education Question [pp. 504-544]

The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

The Education Question. pists, the State authorities began to exclude the Bible and to expurgate the school books. We, however, do not believe that denominational education will seriously interfere with the interest taken in the schools of the State. Christians see that the public schools are exerting an immense influence on the public mind. They have every possible motive to labour to make those schools as good as possible. The establishment of parochial schools, by raising the standard of education, and by provoking emulation, will tend to improve the whole system of State education. Neither, then, on the ground of right nor expediency, can the propriety of the Church assuming her position as " one of the parties" in the work of education, be legitimately called in question. By her divine commission she is required to teach all nations. It is impossible that she should fulfil her commission without, in a multitude of cases, engaging in the work of secular education. And, therefore, wherever and whenever the proper religious and secular training of the young cannot be otherwise accomplished, it is the bounden official duty, as well as the prerogative, of the Church, to intervene for the attainment of that object. Our fourth position is, that in the existing state of our country, our Church cannot properly give up the whole work of education to the State. Having seen that religion is an essential element in the education of the young, and that it is equally the right and duty of the Church and State to provide for them a Christian and Protestant training, it is obvious that the separate duty of these two parties to the work, is one to be determined by circumstances. If the State provides such an education for the people as the conscience of the Church demands, there is no necessity for separate Church action in the premises. And, on the other hand, if parents or the Church make such provision for this object as satisfies the necessities of the State, there is no need fo' State intervention. The position assumed by our Church and by a large part of the Christian community is, that the State does not in fact, in this country, and cannot rationally be expected to, furnish an education sufficiently religious to satisfy the just demands of a Christian people, and therefore, that it is the duty of the Church, while endeavouring 586 [JULY,

/ 184
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 529-538 Image - Page 536 Plain Text - Page 536

About this Item

Title
The Education Question [pp. 504-544]
Author
Breckenridge, R. J.
Canvas
Page 536
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 26, Issue 3

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-26.003/544:5

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-26.003

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The Education Question [pp. 504-544]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-26.003. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.