Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]

The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Conservative and Progressive. servative harmony of thought in reference to all great funda mental truths, which constitutes the only solid basis for an organic, and, therefore, a real and permanent progress. Let education, then, be thorough and well-proportioned, as far as it goes, or, in other words, combining a proper adjustment of the several departments of knowledge; let it be liberal,.8Ea E%Evo;~,o5, as Aristotle calls it, that is, for man as man, instead of being ever warped to those one-sided, partial pursuits, that have falsely usurped the name of the practical, and which will ever take care of themselves, without any special patronage; let it, in short, be predominantly spiritual, in the most catholic sense of the word, as opposed generally to the materializing tendency of almost all that goes under the name of business, and which needs to be repressed rather than stimulated in the soul's early training: let education have these characteristics, we say, and without doubt will it be conservative, constructive, truly progressive, and humane-that is cherishing a respect for the common reason and universal sentiments of the race, and for all those institutions which have ever grown out of their spontaneous action, or which justly claim for themselves a divine appointment. Such institutions, instead of destroying for the sake of any untried forms or fancied reforms, it would ever conserve, by makling them share in the true progress of the race, so far as such progress may be an upward as well as an onward movement of our humanity. It would thus conserve, by ever modifying them into fresh channels for good, and thus regarding them as the abiding media, through which the best and highest life of which we are capable in this world is to be developed. Let education, on the other hand, be every where partial, utilitarian in the ordinary sense of the word, one-sided-let it be rapid and superficial in its course, as it can, must, and will be, when regarded as a means to success in what is called business, or as subordinate to any end that is actually of a lower nature than itself-let it be predominantly physical and materializing-let it cast off all deference to authority, and all connexion with the past-let it be proud of an assumed independence, clamorous for private judgment in that sense which denies that any truths are conclusively settled for the human reason, boastful of the present, ever strain VOL. XXIII.-NO. II. 26 1851.] 289

/ 182
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 285-294 Image - Page 289 Plain Text - Page 289

About this Item

Title
Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]
Canvas
Page 289
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-23.002/297:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-23.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.