Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]

The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Absurditizes of Modern Education. his thoughts may have come. If, moreover, he would ever truly think for himself, with strength and clearness, he must first be content to think with others through the domain of what may be called settled science, and established truth. The other method assumes, or seems to assume, that there is no such domain. All things are to be taken as yet unsettled and unknown. It is made a merit in the student that he thus regards it. All his studies are to proceed upon such a supposition of fancied independence. Other minds have discovered nothing-at least nothing for him. He is to make his own way through the wilderness, and this, too, on the modest assumption that others have failed in finding truth, or, at all events, that there is no path which he can trust on their authority. Any such idea would be only a subjecting the mind to trammels, and an impediment to the freedom of thought. Now, besides the sham and mockery of all this, the great mischief is, that what the student starts with as a hypothesis merely, although a very foolish hypothesis, becomes at length a settled habit of his mind. He grows up with this wretched conceit of thinking for himself, and despising all authority; while the continual effort at independence, or the avoidance of any path marked out by others, take away all true freedom and enlargement, as well as all rectitude of thought. In this way, too, the student loses the invigorating confidence of truth, from the darkening assumption that it is ever to be discovered, even in its elementary foundations. When, however, he has really reached this terminus of settled science, he may, on that very account, with the stronger faith, launch his boat into the sea of the yet undiscovered and unknown. The art or science of analysis should, it is true, be taught as a distinct branch of culture or mental exercise, to be used when occasion calls for it; but the error complained of consists in reversing the order of nature, and making it the universal method in all departments. Youth are encouraged to be explorers and discoverers before they have learned the foundations of knowledge, or have even ascertained that there are any such foundations. Thus in religious teaching, the tendency now is to throw 274 [APRIL

/ 182
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 265-274 Image - Page 274 Plain Text - Page 274

About this Item

Title
Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]
Canvas
Page 274
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-23.002/282:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-23.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.