Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]

The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

The Old Greeck Geometry., logical and metaphysical, as well as mathematical, than were called out in the construction of that most splendid synthesis of the human intellect. How much may even the sublime structure of the modern mathematics, ever rising higher and higher into the illimitable relations of space and quantity, be indebted for its security and fair proportions to the strength of the founda tion, which was so rapidly laid by the Grecian mind. Archi medes is mainly known from the semi-fabulous stories of Plutarch respecting his machines; to the scholar and the historian of science, the chief interest respecting him will ever come from the deep mason-work of his conical and spherical geometry. Among the changes in modern education, there is no one, we think, more questionable than the substitution of Legendre for Euclid. One great end of mathematical, and especially of geo metrical study, is almost wholly lost by it. The logic, which led to that most perfect idea of synthetical truth, seems to have formed no part of the Frenchman's plan. Should it, however, be thought to betray a want of modesty for one who is not a mathematician to make some of these declarations, we can only plead the relations of the subject to other departments of educa tion. There is much more than a mathematical interest involved. It reaches to all the other provinces of the mind's culture. In respect to the higher and more analytical branches of mathematical science, all deference would be shown to those whose peculiar department of knowledge it may be said to be; yet even here, the opinion may be modestly hazarded, that something of a more synthetical nature, consisting of texts, and propositions, and formal rules in place of mere symbolical formulas, and also, to some extent, geometrical illustrations, might be of service to the student in some parts of these difficult branches, especially at the commencement. They might give him clearness and solidity when he comes afterwards, in the more intricate winding of the labyrinth, to turn himself through necessity to the tort and firm, yet slender thread of analysis. The old geometry, and indeed all synthetical science, as we have defined it, may be said to have length, breadth, and depth. The analytical mathematics may be compared to an endless line of truth stretching on to infinity, taxing by its exceeding subtlety the highest powers of the human 1851.] 271

/ 182
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 265-274 Image - Page 271 Plain Text - Page 271

About this Item

Title
Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]
Canvas
Page 271
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-23.002/279:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-23.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.