Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]

The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Process of Discovery. words, the general truth reduced to a particular case or figure for more easy comprehension. Next comes the demonstration, or the exhibition of the link by which it is connected with pre vious propositions, and thus bound firmly to what was previously in the mind. In this way there is finally established and made the mind's own, what was before received as a truth of authority to be proved or tested, not discovered for the first time. Such a pretence of discovery would be an unreality, a sham, unworthy the dignity of science, and rather enfeebling the mind (as every mock process must) for that real analysis and discovery in which the student may be called to exercise himself when he reaches the boundary of the really unknown, (that is, as yet unanalyzed by any mind, or brought within the enclosures of known truth,) and for which previous accurate knowledge is the most thorough and effective preparation. It might be interesting to trace the process, could we do so, through which Pythagoras, or whoever he was that first discovered the proposition generally known as the 47th of Euclid, arrived at the result. We may be quite certain that it was not in that perfectly logical order, by which it is approached in the Elements. It may have been through much guessing, or confused insight just enough to give a strong persuasion of the truth, and yet unable for a long time to connect it with previous acquisitions. It may have been aided by a crude experimenting, assuming the truth for that purpose as a temporary hypothesis, although as yet unproved. There, may have been even a resort to actual measurement, and imperfect trials of various kinds, both practical and theoretical, until finally, after much groping in this way, although with strong assurance of something to reward the search, the hidden connecting links were seen, and the position to which the soul had thus, as it were, reached out in advance, is at length apprehended, made fast, and firmly bound to the previously known; that is, to that which had itself before this been thus vaticinated, and secured, and bound fast in like manner. Then might have been raised the cry of Eureka, for then was found not the lost, but what had previously been lying in the chaos of the mind's unread thoughts, dimly apprehended, and obscurely seen, until brought at last into the clear light of its connexion with other truth. It is first guessed, 1851.] 269

/ 182
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 265-274 Image - Page 269 Plain Text - Page 269

About this Item

Title
Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]
Canvas
Page 269
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 23, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-23.002/277:4

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-23.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Three Absurdities of Certain Modern Theories of Education [pp. 265-292]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-23.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 23, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.