On the Use and Abuse of Systematic Theology [pp. 171-190]

The Princeton review. / Volume 4, Issue 2

Systems of Theology. we shall name a few of those writers who contributed to the mass of doctrinal theology before the Reformation. There are those who trace the origin of the scholastic divinity to as high an epoch as the monophysitic controversy in the fifth and sixth centuries; yet it is more usual to consider John Scotus Erigenai a theologian of the ninth century as the founder of this method. It was, however, the Platonic philosophy, by which he endeavoured to elucidate divine truth. He signalized himself as an antagonist of the predestinarians, in the court of Charles the Bold. The Schoolmen, or Scholastics are supposed to have been so called from their training in the theological schools of Charlemagne. This training was little else than regular instruction in the Latin version of Aristotle, the writings of Boethius and Porphyry, and the Peripapatetic dialectics. Three periods are noted by Buhle: the first ends with Roscellinus (A. D. 1089), or the contest between the Realists and Nominalists; the second with Albertus Magnus (ob. 1230), at which time the metaphysics of Aristotle were generally known and expounded; the third extends to the revival of letters in the fifteenth century.) The renowned Englishman Alexander de Hales, holds an eminent rank among the ancient scholastics, as is commonly cited as Doctor Irrefragabilis: until the time of Aquinas, his commentary on Lombard was a universal text-book. Thomas Aquinas, Doc tor,ngelicus, and a saint of the calendar, was the pupil of Albertus Magnus, and so close an adherent of Aristotle that he left fifty-two commentaries upon the works of the latter. It is unnecessary to advert to the estimation in which he has ever been held by the Romanists; although it has been satisfactorily shown by Protestants that this truly great man, diverged in a multitude of instances from the doctrines of the Catholic faith, as they are now defined. t Next in eminence was his great competitor, John Duns Scotus, whose dialectic acumen was proverbial, and who is denominated Doctor Subtilis. From this rivalry of sects, arose the familiar distinctions of Thomists and Scotists. During the third period, flourished the celebrated Durand, called, on account of his independent boldness, Doctor Resolutissimus. This remarkable man was bishop of Meaux, and died about the year 1333. He went out from Brockhaus Real-Worterb. vol. ix. p. 835. Buddei Isagoge, p. 326. Hornii hist. Phil. 1. vi. cii. p. 297. t DORSCHAEUS. Aquinas Confessor Veriitatis. 175

/ 164
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 175-184 Image - Page 175 Plain Text - Page 175

About this Item

Title
On the Use and Abuse of Systematic Theology [pp. 171-190]
Canvas
Page 175
Serial
The Princeton review. / Volume 4, Issue 2

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-04.002
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf4325.1-04.002/175:3

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf4325.1-04.002

Cite this Item

Full citation
"On the Use and Abuse of Systematic Theology [pp. 171-190]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf4325.1-04.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.