The French Dramatists: Corneille [pp. 763-766]

Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 8, Issue 12

764 The French Di'amalis's. [DEcEMBEa, man must be a second rate genius, at least as respects all utilitarian and instructive results, when his views and theories are so far beyond his times, as to contain nothing practically to affect his fellow pilgrims. It is, however, a pleasant belief to a writer, the conviction that he is not appreciated, because he has wandered too far onward, for uninspired eyes to follow his movements, and slightly founded as such a comfort frequently may be, it is one whose private consolation gives it something of a claim to public leniency. But it is difficult to conceive, there ever can e an era su ited to many of th e minds no w a broad i n the wi de rea lm of literature; and it requires more brilliancy of imagination than distinguishes the generality of readers, to fancy an age when Carlylism will be the prevailing, diction, and Transcendentalism, no longer mystifying indisputable truths, by viewing them as through a glass darkly, shall be to common people, a common faith. Certain it is, that the intellects whose splendor has lived on, changeless, amid all changes, were those, in character, a portion of their own times, the lofty representatives of their gene ration, and however superior in themselves, still imbued in some degree with the universal spirit of the mass around them. Genius, in its separate, mysterious existence, is ever' apart and lonely;' but in its effect on others, it is universal, for it works by appealing to those emotions and illusions, which act upon every thoughtful and feeling being. The dramatic writings of the French, scarcely deserve that name, till the presiding genius of Cor neille, and shortly afterwards, that of Racine, gave form and regularity to this branch of literature. Under their guiding and superintending influence, it arose to maturity, and to that perfection which its originally artificial character is capable of ac quiring. It is eloquent with the tone of the so ciety in whose midst its progress commenced, and full of the impressions spreading far and wide around its votaries. The reverence for religion, as vet untainted by the skeptical philosophy of the succeeding generation, the profound and respectful devotion to all that time had handed down, and hal lowed, and that regard for outward propriety almost forgotten in later productions, give to the dramas of that period, with some few exceptions, a style of dignified and simple purity, which has only too soon passed away. Corneille was the founder and perfector of a new school, based on higher and nobler principles, than any which had preceeded it: the drama assumed under his control, a finished and original style, and he laid down certain regulations for its govern ment, which are still adhered to, by his dramatic successors in popular favor. The traits of his own intellect, bold, imaginative and manly, were calcu lated to trace a decisive and permanent impression on all which yielded to their influence, and he could not fail to produce improvement in the literature of kened ambition, for the applause, the wonder, the visible and rapturous admiration of the crowd. As this wish, at first indistinct and visionary, becomes decided and confirmed, the author writes more carefully. He still looks into his own heart for inspiration, but he looks with altered, and more timid gaze; for, the love of approval has taught him to dread censure. The fever-thirst for approbation deepens to a prevailing passion; the merely intuitive perception, and involuntary exercise of his gifts, are elevated into a settled knowledge of the responsibility they confer, and a conscientious avowal and employment of the master-spirit within. The selfish aspiration for personal distinction is merged in the nobler solicitude, to benefit, though he scarcely knows how, his fellow men. A change has come over his views and aims. His ruling desire is no longer a vacrgue aspiring for sympathy; he does not seek to meet personal appreciation, but to enforce extended conviction; he ceases to consult exclusively his individual promptings, and with his rapidly growing hope of the world's praise, comes also greater respect, in seeming at least, for the criticizing jury whose verdict he awaits. He considers, with politic foresight, their tastes and prejudices, and without relinquishing independence, or sacrificing originality, he endeavors to mould his works to suit the general character of the tribunal, before which his recorded genius is to stand. Henceforth, his compositions, though original in matter, are nevertheless influenced and colored by popular opinion, and therefore display at the same time, the peculiar intellectual attributes of the writer, and the prevailing characteristics of the judges whose favorable sentence he strives to obtain. In dramatic literature, this double nature is most visibly evinced; for, the drama is necessarily an appeal to the mass of men, to be decided on by the feelings and sympathies of the many, not the criticism or judgment of the few. To be suc cessful in his labors, the poet must turn from his own dream-world, to the less glowing and restless one, of active life; he must draw from familiar objects and universal associations, the hidden spirit of poetry; he must write for men as they are, before their final decision will make him what he would be. He may lay his scenes in other lands; he may portray and recall the actors of other times, but he must blend with the heroes of the shadowy past, something of the true and living present; else, would the very oracles of old be uttered to care less listeners. And at last, it is no such difficult thing, though somewhat a rare one in these days, for an author who can write well at all, to compose intelligibly to the comprehension of the throng; for human thought, with all its apparent variety and fickleness, moves and acts in a circle, and the heart is ever consistent in its inconsistencies. It has bee n remarked, t hat a freat mind is one in advance of the era in which it appeals; but a 764 The F)-ench Di-amatists. [DECEM13P,R,

/ 62
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 761-770 Image - Page 764 Plain Text - Page 764

About this Item

Title
The French Dramatists: Corneille [pp. 763-766]
Author
Worthington, Jane Tayloe Lomax
Canvas
Page 764
Serial
Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 8, Issue 12

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0008.012
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf2679.0008.012/772:8

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf2679.0008.012

Cite this Item

Full citation
"The French Dramatists: Corneille [pp. 763-766]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0008.012. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.