Capt. Marryatt, Part I [pp. 253-276]

Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 7, Issue 4

258 Capt. Marryalt and hi8 Thary. [APRIL,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ England, on the contrary, London is the great reservoir, where all that is dignified, learned and polite, is annually collected; and from that city, as from a focus, light and refinemenit are diffused throughout the land. Whether the evils, arising from the disproportioned magnitude of that overgrown emporium do not more than counterbalance these superficial advantages, is a question well worthy the consideration of the moral and political philosopher. We are no advocates for those innovations which some of our citizens, less influential than wise in their own conceit, have attempted to engraft upon the language; nor do we believe that our literary men are disposed to encourage their adoption. Without disputing Capt. Marryatt's veracity, we must be permitted to conjecture, that the American, who asserted that " Webster's Dictionary was the only one used in the Court of St. James by the king, queen and princesses, and that by royal order," merely intended to perpetrate a hoax; or, if he was serious, must have been on a par in point of information with that "learned Theban," mentioned by our author, who gravely affirmed, that "King Charles III. was a printer. and not unfrequently worked at the trade after he ascended the throne of England." That some words have crept into the language, as spoken here, unauthorized by the classic writers of the English tongue, is not to be denied; and it is equally unquestionable, that even in Britain, large accessions have been made to it since the Augustan age of Queen Anne; whether to its improvoment in force or elegance may well be doubted. For ourselves we have an insuperable aversior to these exotics, believing that if they continue to be tolerated, the writings of our time will be as unintelligible to our posterity, without a glossary, as the poetry of Chaucer is to us. To entitle Capt. Marryatt to pronounce with such an air of confidence on American character, he should have spent years in this country; have mingled with us familiarly in public and private; and frequented not only the society of towns and cities, but the hospitable dwellings of our rural population. By his own acknowledgment, he shunned designedly the invitations proffered to him by the courtesy of our citizens. His observations were circumscribed, in a great measure, to the inhabitants of towns and cities; to the company at a few fashionable watering-places; and to the motley throng, who crowd our hotels, mail-coaches and steamboats. He had scarcely a glimpse of that numerous and intelligent class, who are engaged in tillage. We cannot discover from his Diary that he visited any part of that immnense tract, embraced-in the limits of the southern and south-western states, except Western Virginia; and he must therefore have known nothing of that lawless and bar barous region, as he describes it, but from the report of others. Though many men of worth and intelligence are found in our cities, their population consists chiefly of needy adventurers in pursuit of gain, of a lawless rabble, and of a numerous body of discontented and turbulent emigrants, the very refuse of Europe. There are said to be forty thou sand Irish in New York alone. In such an assemblage of heterogeneous materials, it is not surprising that vice should predominate; and indeed, according to Capt. Marryatt's own hypothesis, nothing can be more demoralizing than to pack men in masses within a narrow space. The same causes are at work in the cities of Europe, and with results, if we may judge from our author's opinion, equally disastrous to the interests of virtue. The population of the towns and cities in this country constitute but a small fraction of its inhabitants. Our peo ple are essentially agricultural. In the allodial owners and cultivators of the soil reside the physical and political power of the United States, and among them still flourish the un corrupted manners, the republican simplicity, the generous hospitality, the unobtrusive yet manly virtues of our fathers; qualities which languish and wither in the polluted atmosphere of cities. Many of these hardy freemen have liberal and enlightened minds; but scattered over an extensive surface, and absorbed in their own quiet and usefill pursuits, they are less clamorous than others, and are destitute of those facilities of political concert and combination which are enjoyed by the manufacturing and commercial classes. Hence travellers, who, from their position, look necessarily on the mere superficies of things, seldom suspect the value of what lies beneath, and never have leisure to explore the moral wealth of this broad and solid substratum of American society and institutions. Hence, too, the influence of our agricultural class in elections is not always commensurate with their numbers; but when once roused they are irresistible. From their insulated situation they are more easily misled by the false and delusive statements of artful men, and more slow in detecting political imposture, than the quick-witted and watchful inhabitants of towns and cities; but their purposes as a mass are always honest and patriotic. With this important body, the bone and sinew of our country, Capt. Marryatt must have had a very slight and imperfect acquaintance, when he promulgated his severe and unqualified strictures on American morals. His time was spent chiefly in hotels, stages and steamboats, and it is therefore not at all remarkable that he should have charged intemperance on us as a national vice; for it is to such places that the votaries of the bottle usually resort for the gratification of their ruling propensity. Though we are a migratory people, thousands nevertheless traverse the United States annually with their own conveniences for travelling; and hence the bulk of those, who avail themselves of public conveyances, are by no means the elite of our population. It is notorious to every man at all conversant with such matters, that there is a class of people who hang very loosely on society, and who, having no regular occupation or permanenrt abiding place, infest all our great thoroughfares in considerable numbers. The habits and manners of such men are surely no fair index of American character. We ask then emphatically, can a traveller, whose view has been limited to the streets and hotels of our cities, to a few of our watering-places, and to the casual passengers in steamboats and stages, with such glimpses of the country and its inhabitants as could be obtained in his rapid transit from one town to another, be qualified to pronounce judgment of condemnation on us morally and politically? Yet, for aught that can be gathered from his scanty narrative, such is the predicament of Capt. Marryatt; and we submit it to an impartial world to decide what credit his testimony, under such circumstances, is entitled to. Had our author formed his opinions on that cautious induction, exacted not more by the dictates of philosophy than the obligations of justice; had he been less astute in dis cerning subjects of censure, and more open to favorable im pressions, we had been spared this virulent attack on the United States; and what perhaps is a still heavier inflic tion, so many tiresome, lumnbering pages of political disqui sition. But he felt himself the Atlas of conservatism, and, resolving to demolish what to his diseased imagination seemed the strong hold of radical principles, he run a tilt at a government and people, who, without the aid of kings or nobles, had pursued a career of unexampled prosperity for nearly seventy years. Little did we think, that a simple traveller, with no higher credentials than a captain's com mission in the British navy, and coming here apparently on a mere excursion of curiosity or amusement, was big with the fate of empires; and was preparing to arrest, by a stroke of his pen, the fearful progress of revolution. The gallant captain avers that he should not have uttered this libel against the United States but in defence of his own country; the logic of which ingenious apology amounts to this, that the vilification of his neighbor is the most con Capt. Marryalt and his Diary. LA riti r,, 258

/ 96
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 249-258 Image - Page 258 Plain Text - Page 258

About this Item

Title
Capt. Marryatt, Part I [pp. 253-276]
Author
Dabney, John Blair
Canvas
Page 258
Serial
Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 7, Issue 4

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0007.004
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf2679.0007.004/262:5

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf2679.0007.004

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Capt. Marryatt, Part I [pp. 253-276]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0007.004. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 21, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.