Philosophy of Anitiquity, No. II [pp. 32-34]

Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 3, Issue 1

SOUTHERN LITERARY MESSENGER. there particularly did he wish to open his school; to his conuurymen w as he most willing to inipart those secret sto:es of wvsdoid that lie hasd so laboriously striven for, and sionorably gainied. His wshlies were disappointed, aind lis Wvatnt of S,icccS ofreis a painful corroboration of thait famed maxim, that " no one is a prophet in his na tive laid." vw.s i agai a wanderer in the islands of the Aggean, andi oa tiih ain land of Greece. At the court of Leon of Adl iet he first assunied the title of philosopher. The occas;,,ii of his assuing it, as handed down to us, I tlhnk. y Atlus Gell ius, is one of thel most delicious morsels of the gossip of antiqcuity now in our possession. Leon, sruck witli admiration at hbs universality of knwIlved C, asked him whivch of -ll arts did he prefer? Pyt haLgoras aunswecrcd aftor Is fashion: "iNo art or trade, oh kinO, do I follow i to none of them do I sub.. jeer milyseif, hrot aiy bii is thue art of arts-Lilosopla." Aoil to tie kint'as (uestloin, "Vhat sort of thing is 1t)1 s ph'loS:)hy?" le is reported to have answered: L Life i lik I unto ai ~ lyrmp.e game. Aud as there are who visit E'is, some to contend for the victory for glory's sake, aud some for the priz alone, and others who come to p.ly their trades, aiid 1mo01e whose object is to waetch the contest, so in tife, chiefs and wvarriors strutggle for the- ascendanicy, nmerchiints and artizans sell their wares,-c! sodine few look on as spectators, study the wvsayw ardL tli~ ory, dspis g th.e animal contest of the one, aitld the trt'ickry of th i other; yet as the bee of llybl Ia extracts sweet honey firom the rankoetsweed, they draw' useful ime, rls anda ssuidclom from the attentive olsersv,iice of the actions of each. These morals and wis,idom are philosoph,y, anId the spectators are its votaries." I knuos not if inmeory furniishes aright either the aneci,otee or its attthor; but all will admit its truttl to wosoleoni ocs ciit 1eleains. His sojourn at Phlius was not long, and once more I!e returod to Samos. le opened successfully a public slie of philosophy, and occasionally retiring to a lovely and beautiful cave with his chosen friends and fitoreite soliolars, lie imipar,ted wv IttS all the mystery of an casternii priest to!)is Ibcads of ~~cophytes, those truithl vs ilds the awvs of his Iand, and the opinions of the age, rendeired it impossiT ol and inipolitic for limi to discourse of in pul lic. Th,e mystery wvitli whiihisi Esoteries were ta. ht, h cei,:seci some to rank him amoni impostors; but italy it not 10e, that this apparent mystery Iresults fr(si t lie exLggeration of theo excluded crowid. Samos he~ was fiiccd to quit, and Ci'otoni in Magia G-rccia had tiih honor of fitrishin::. hit a asyltum,i. J:'ioi this time his hiiiitoy is that; of the Coluntry l1. had- ad,i,ptedl. 1His pupilsi Ieccam~e rewOlt tilonisls in go v ens'nieli, cud it seenicil'o!o tils fato of tile fliSIndc., of' the first sect, to be- fb'.cedI c the0 cxpells of persoinal Iilcovei~i nc, lo 0 o extelad hs fam a0 nid p: —oisuI-ate li' -octitis.l Exle fr -us C,'oto-n1a, Metalci )h105 ti I rcive i-'iii~, anI therec d~e I:it reulieved h~in f-.uom tls~e persecuition a p Tlar coiniso' ic iii)11 a tc'lol, I ii 1here' to) lie Ct/Cd of starvrtioli,.i cin h, thi-' i y;esr e f I'S sixty-eiglth tla th east, that OC-d~I.,iel C,, of atirounomly and m~adthe iimiities, Pythagoras appears to lhave iibed f h e current physical theories. So deeply was he imipressed ef tle imiportance of isumbers, tiha,t he imagied all nature reFuIlated by thore, or as lie exp,reie d h iiself, "thisgs are ans imitatiotn of numbICer,"' -'1 he divided into (retioi) equial anid (pci'itioi) tiuequal. UitIiy is tle pr inciple of the firdt, nuality of the latter. Uni-ity lie assumed as his cieblem of coinpletencss, s tihe numbter correspondilng to the Deity in the I hysical world, as the representative of the sun, and in his nsoiral code it stood for virtue. Dualitiy is a result of unity and is ici-i~,;plete. It is the emb emn of imyperfection, andI is in all thiiings the opposite of unity. By comblinations of the ullify and clduiality, wvserc formedl the tetraclhys, in bhich all nature's course was traced. It seems to me, that in this oppositioni of the g-oo' d and the 1ad, of absoluite perfctioniu andl its cointrary, vs- flisi eou to prove tile oriental origin of the systemi, a11(1 see ceiiiliodied the good anid evil genii of the Arab tale. Pythalsgor-as, like his predecessors, considered thIe world as an liarmonliois vwhole, (its very name was kesaas, or order,) sub-divided into imperfect par-ts, according to his tetracliys, each revolving around a common centre, and followvin harmonic laws. F'roim their usotion he derived "the')Aic of the spi'ecs." I'lie central five, the sun, lie called the watch-honse of Jove —the most perfect thing in the physical world, the source of heat, and first cause of all vitality. The stars, according to his theory, are emaiiations of tlie sun, and are divinities. The soul of miI, aloptil)g the Proiecthan filale, is lileewise an enianationi of the sun. an's soul is therefore divine. Here, by his confuision of God and Sol, vve see what lw ill induce us to believe, that during his captivity at the court of Camubyses, he became acquainted wcvitli the doctrines of' the Gubl)S es of Persia, and min-ling theomvs with the divitce Juda/eal idea of ti e Godlike erinin of at least one portion of muan's exist. once, he formed so wonderful an Eclecticism for the age in wihiCli lie lived. An tioportant rfle in this philosophy wvsas performed Iby demons, but the prime mover of all tliins was God and (h,'t-Ie) his siwill. Pytlitigoras first cenobled the idea i-f Ii Deity, by atti-ibutiin —' to it tlse moral properties of tr,.lih iii cood will to his creatuites. h i,},d ii an emanation of' the D'eity, therefore it ca'nnot.i. Wiat then becomies of it? As an answe or to this question, lie adopted the Aetempoy cliosis. Whliait trl itlous le is sa.id to have believed his own soil to have tndergonie, is in every on1e's mouth. From lihas coniifiui~d~iig G(od wvit'., the sun, it was necessary for hii 0 to h,.-Iiis lte soul mailiteriill. 'Tlim we are i'de bte d for the first Psychological ailyiis, whsesIclt11' -h1s:ot. teCasoil, or (~ious); 2(1. in,tells-i e,.', or (phi''oiis)-tiie seat of theso twio is in the bra-sii; 3dii~.d last, the appetites (thu.~es) wvischI exist iu theu uieast. I iii i by this analysis lie benefitted man kind more thiaii by -,ill f h,.is poCt:iys ihAl, IpioliticaI and inusical (Cor 1)]e wvas said to haLve been the inventor of iisting'id h i-i}stiitets). it swas the first aittempt of man 0o it t(Fij, e ixnal world for thit of thoiz,ht. i V'yt Caor, though toachi'lili lilims-elf nil branches of o,, 1a1 no ptipil vvlio resembledi him in univ,er;lty of' puilrsit; eachi devoted himself to a particular VOL. III.-5 33

/ 104
Pages Index

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages A033-A042 Image - Page A033 Plain Text - Page A033

About this Item

Title
Philosophy of Anitiquity, No. II [pp. 32-34]
Author
Robinson, Conway
Canvas
Page A033
Serial
Southern literary messenger; devoted to every department of literature and the fine arts. / Volume 3, Issue 1

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0003.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moajrnl/acf2679.0003.001/41:20

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes. These materials are in the public domain in the United States. If you have questions about the collection, please contact Digital Content & Collections at [email protected]. If you have concerns about the inclusion of an item in this collection, please contact Library Information Technology at [email protected].

DPLA Rights Statement: No Copyright - United States

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moajrnl:acf2679.0003.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Philosophy of Anitiquity, No. II [pp. 32-34]." In the digital collection Making of America Journal Articles. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acf2679.0003.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 24, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.