Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.

950 The United States vs. Sutter. represent correctly where the line on map A. P. L. marked' "Lindero latitud norte 380 41' 32"" crosses the Sacramento river, where would the south line of the grant 380 49' 32" cross the same river. Ans. At the end of course 151 of the survey of tract No. 3, shown on the plat filed Feb'y 25th, 1853, and three and three-eighths miles due north from the junction of the American and Sacramento rivers Cross-examination. Questions by counsel for intervenor Woodruff et al. and J. A. Sutter et al. Ques. 9. Examine the map now shown to you marked Exhibit E. W. P., state what it is, and by whom it was made. Ans. It is a copy of the northern part of the plat of the official survey filed Feb'y 25th, 1863, as far as it regards the boundaries of tracts Nos. 2, 4, 12 and 13, and the topography of the country 1565 thereabout. It was copied by myself fully from the plat of survey of the New Helvetia rancho on file in the U. S. surveyor general's office, and is a complete copy of that portion thereof with the exception of the portion of Hock Farm tract, shown by the yellow lines on the Exhibit. 10. State whether or not the yellow lines on said exhibit correctly represents the tract of land embraced within the following description, to wit: commencing at a point on the west bank of Feather river three miles above the house which is marked Sutter's house on the plat of the official survey in this case, filed February 25th, 1863, thence running six miles down the river, and having a depth of four miles westwardly from the river. Ans. Substantially it does. Deposition closed. C. BIELAWSKI. Subscribed and sworn to this 20th day of April, A. D. 1863, before me, W. H. CHEEVERS, U. S. Com. Counsel for intervenor Gelston objects to all the foregoing testimony, from question 1 to question 8, both inclusive, as being 1566 wholly irrelevant, the U. S. Supreme Court having located the southern boundary of the grant south of Sutter's fort. Endorsed: Filed April 21, 1863. W. H. CHEVERS, Clerk. Exhibit, Coleman.No. 1.-Deeds and Map. Deed book 3, page 228. Know all men by these presents that I, John H. Sutter, of Hock Farm, in the State of California, in consideration of three thousand

/ 990
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 948-952 Image - Page 950 Plain Text - Page 950

About this Item

Title
Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.
Author
United States. appellant.
Canvas
Page 950
Publication
[Washington]: Govt. print. off.
[1863?]
Subject terms
Land grants -- California
Land grants -- California

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ajc3556.0001.001/958

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ajc3556.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.