Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.

7The United States vs. Sutter. 847 1282 upon said line would average from X to f of a mile to the east of said eastern line. Quest. 31st. Is or is not said grass land good and valuable for pasturage and grazing in the dry season of the year? Ans. 31st. It is. Quest. 32nd. State as near as you can when you surveyed the land for Muldron and McKee of which you have spoken before. Ans. 32nd. I think it was in the winter of 1850 and 1851. Direct examination resumed.-Ques. by U. S. att'y. Quest. 33rd. In your answer to quest. 10 you say, "On the west surveyed line of the Rancho del Paso, the line of tule commenced about half a mile north of the American river;" and in answer to quest. 24 you say that it was all good land in September, 1850, 1283 on the west line of the Del Paso rancho for the distance of a mile and a half from the American river. Please explain this more fully. Ans. 33rd. I consider the tule land the best land when reclaimed; therefore, I consider it is all good land. Cross-examination resumed. —Qaes. by counselfor Hiram Grimes; Ques. 34th. In reference to your last answer, has any of said land been ditched or dyked for the purposes of reclamation, or has the reclamation that you speak of accrued solely from its occupation, cultivation, or use? Ans. 34th. Not solely, but principally from the deposit of alluvial caused by the overflows of the river. None of the said land has been ditched or dyked for the purposes of reclamation. Deposition closed. JOHN G. CLEAL. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th August, A. D. 1861. r[SE AL. CUTLER McALLISTER, [SEAL.] U. S. Comm'r. 1284 Exhibit Cleal No. 1 objected to as irrelevant, incompetent, and inadmissible and not proved; and all the questions and answers relating to the land prior to 1860 objected to on the part of Grimes and McKee, and the objections by agreement of parties are here noted instead of separately to each question and answer. CUTLER McALLISTER, U. S. Comn'r. Endorsed: Filed Oct. 9, 1861. W. H. CHEVERS, Clerk. (Here follows map, page 1284.) 1285 I, Horace A. Higley, surveyor general and register of the State land office, hereby certify that the land embraced within

/ 990
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 843-847 Image - Page 847 Plain Text - Page 847

About this Item

Title
Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.
Author
United States. appellant.
Canvas
Page 847
Publication
[Washington]: Govt. print. off.
[1863?]
Subject terms
Land grants -- California
Land grants -- California

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ajc3556.0001.001/855

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ajc3556.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.