Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.

The United States vs. Sutter. 643 3. With a view to ascertain the precise locality and boundaries of each claim with as much accuracy as possible, you will consult the most reliable witnesses that can be obtained, who may have resided in the vicinity, or have been more or less connected with the former government officials in the disposition of lands, and who may, from personal knowledge, be intimate with the boundaries and landmarks mentioned in the grant, and other documents relating thereto. You will enter in your field-book all information that may have a tendency to throw light upon any matter in controversy, or to show the 675 propriety of the course you adopt in making the survey. 4. Upon making these preliminary examinations, should you have good reason to believe that, in any instance, by the phraseology of the final decree, lands are included therein which are clearly not embraced within the limits of the claim as originally granted, you will be particular in your endeavors to ascertain the exact nature and cause of such variance, and report all the facts to this office for further instructions. 5. Whei a confirmee is limited to a less quantity of land than is embraced within the boundaries of his original title papers, he may select out of any portion of such larger tract the quantity to which he is entitled; but the quantity thus selected must form a compact body of land; and if any portion of the original grant has been sold, as such, by the owners thereof, such portion is to be included within the limits of the claim thus selected, if practicable, without 675 destroying the compactness of the survey. 6. It is required, in locating these claims, that the boundaries shall conform, as near as the nature of each case will admit of, to the lines forming the legal subdivisions of the public lands; and hence. when the boundary is not the bed or bank of a river, or other water-course, the margin of a swamp, or other overflowed land, or a line separating different claims, it should, if possible, be established by running to the cardinal points, so as to correspond to what otherwise would be the general course of such boundary line, and at the same time dispense with fractions of the legal subdivisions of sections when the adjacent public lands are surveyed. 7. When a river, creek, arroyo, or other water-course which is not navigable, or declared to be so by the laws of the State, forms a boundary of any rancho, you will run the line along the channel or middle of the bed of such stream, and not on either of its banks; and when swamp or other overflowed lands constitute the bounda677 ry, you will, unless otherwise specially instructed, if upon tidewater, establish such boundary, so as to coincide with the line of ordinary high tide; but if not upon tide-water, with the line where the land becomes of such a marshy or overflowed character as, in ordinary seasons. to prevent the proper cultivation of the soil, or the raising of planted crops. 8. These surveys must be connected with the nearest established corners on the lines of the adjacent public surveys, in order to indicate the precise locality of each claim, and a post must be established at the point where any such line is intersected by the boundary line

/ 990
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 643-647 Image - Page 643 Plain Text - Page 643

About this Item

Title
Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.
Author
United States. appellant.
Canvas
Page 643
Publication
[Washington]: Govt. print. off.
[1863?]
Subject terms
Land grants -- California
Land grants -- California

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ajc3556.0001.001/651

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ajc3556.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.