Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.

Tiie United States vs. Sutter. 529 32nd. What is the effect of those overflows upon cropping, on the banks of those rivers, including the present site of Sacramento city? 377 Ans. It improves the quality of the soil, increases the product of cereal grains, and renders more valuable the lands which otherwise would in a few years become useless. 33rd. Are any lands in the vicinity of those rivers regularly overflowed, each year, except the tule lands? Ans. They are not. Questions by Elihu Johnson. 34th. In reply to question 31 you say that you have never seen the immediate banks or margins overflowed but once, which was in January, 1850; to what rivers do you refer? Ans. I refer to the American river, below the sheep pen, and to the Sacramento river and Feather river. 35th. Where is the sheep pen to which you refer? Ans. It is from I to 2 miles northeast of Sutter's Fort, and northwest of Norristown. [The attorney for the U. S. objects to the foregoing testimony so far as it goes to prove the location or propriety of location 378 east of Feather river and south of the junction of the Feather and Sacramento rivers.] GILBERT A. GRANT. Sworn to and subscribed Dec. 14, 1860, before me. W. H. CHEVERS, U.. Corn. Endorsed: Filed Dec. 14, 1860. W. I. CHEVERS, Clerk. {ertified copy of petition, amended petition, and decree, in case No. 416. To the honorable board of commissioners created by act of Congress of the United States approved March 3rd, A.D. 1851, to ascertain and settle private land claims in the State of California: Roland Gelston, a citizen of Monmouth county, in the State of New Jersey, humbly petitioning, shows unto your honorable body that some time previous to the 18th day of June, of A. D. 1841, one Augustus Sutter, a native of the republic of Switzerland, and 379 naturalized in the Mexican nation, and in conformity with the law of said republic enacted on the 18th day of August, A. D. 1824, and regulations of the 25th of November, A. D. 1828, asked, as will more appear by reference to paper hereunto annexed, and marked Exhibit (A,) for his personal benefit and that of 12 families, eleven leagues of land on the margin of the river Sacramento, in the vacant lands of the frontiers of the north, to colonize and improve them in the terms mentioned in said laws, to which end he has sufficiently accredited his laboriousness, good conduct, and other qualifications required in [REC. ccLvII, D. T. 1862.] —34

/ 990
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 528-532 Image - Page 529 Plain Text - Page 529

About this Item

Title
Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.
Author
United States. appellant.
Canvas
Page 529
Publication
[Washington]: Govt. print. off.
[1863?]
Subject terms
Land grants -- California
Land grants -- California

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ajc3556.0001.001/537

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ajc3556.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 14, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.