Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.

184 The United States vs. Sutter. Answer. I heard him say that he claimed under the Sutter title; this was about a year ago, at his residence on what is generally called "the Ridge" or "Poverty Hill." I suppose it is in this 247 city. Myself and a friend went to Fowler to buy a tract of land within the lines described in Sutter's petition; he refused to sell that particular farm, as he had selected that for his home, but he offered to sell any other in that neighborhood which he might desire. He mentioned the price the land cost him, but I don't now recollect the sum; also named somewhat about the boundaries-said that he claimed beyond the mounds, and in that case he would include my ranch. I then mentioned that I did not believe I was on the Sutter claim at all. He said I was, but he would compromise, or there would be no trouble in compromising by those who had gone on in good faith. It was my friend who wanted to purchase. Fowler said that he bought this land from Sutter and had paid a large price for it. I cannot say positively that he said he bought directly from Sutter, or from those holding under Sutter. Cross-examination. Quest. No. 1. How much land does Fowler hold under the Sutter claim, or how much since 1852? Answer. I do not know; I don't know that he holds any: he said he did. Counsel for appellee objects to this deposition, on the grounds of irrelevancy. G. R. NISBET.. Sworn to and subscribed before me, on this 27th of March, 1856. SAMUEL CROSS, Notary Public Sac. Co., Cal. And now the further examination of witnesses is adjourned until March 28th, 1856, at 10 o'clock a. m., by consent of parties. SAMUEL CROSS, Notary Public Sac. Co., Cal. Friday morning, March 28th, 1856. Now come the parties by their attorneys heretofore named, and the examination of witnesses is thereupon resumed as follows: Deposition of Thos. J. Hall. Thomas J. Hall, a witness produced on the part of the appellant, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 248 Quest. No. 1. What is your name, age, residence, and occupation? Answer. My name is Thomas J. Hall; age 37 years; residence Sacramento county, most of the time; my occupation is farming and mining; I was originally a physician.

/ 990
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 183-187 Image - Page 184 Plain Text - Page 184

About this Item

Title
Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California.
Author
United States. appellant.
Canvas
Page 184
Publication
[Washington]: Govt. print. off.
[1863?]
Subject terms
Land grants -- California
Land grants -- California

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ajc3556.0001.001/192

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ajc3556.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Supreme court of the United States. No. 135. The United States, appellants, vs. John A. Sutter. Appeal from the District court U.S. for the Northern district of California." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ajc3556.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 13, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.