A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

116 PAPIAS. PAPIAS. Brutulus is mentioned, who endeavoured to per- books; but his declaration must be understood as suade his countrymen to renew the struggle against referring to other books than the Scriptures, and the Romans, in B. c..322 [BRUTULUS], and in the even then, must not be too strictly interpreted, for, great Social War, B. c. 90, Papius Mutilus was the according to Eusebius, he was not only well versed leader of the Samnites against Rome [MuTILus]. in the Scriptures, but was a man of great general Some of the Papii probably settled at Rome soon information (ra' 7ra'rTa o'iL uadAhUa ho'ylw'raTos). after this event, and one of them finally obtained Eusebius, indeed, has elsewhere spoken slightingly the consulship in A. D. 9. The Roman Papii were of his intellects, saying (c. 39) that he appears divided into two families, the Celsi and iJutili: to have been "of small understanding," O-IKPOqs the former are given under CELSUS, the latter are wv rev rove. We have observed that Papias may spoken of under PAPIUS. have been still living when Irenaeus w-rrote his book PA'PIAS, one of the principal officers of Sex. A dversus Haereses; but the Paschal or Alexandrian Pompey, was one of the commanders of his fleet in Chronicle states that Papias suffered martyrdom at the battle with Agrippa, off Mylae, B. c. 36. Pergamus, with several other persons, in the same (Appian, B. C. v. 104, 106, &c.) He appears to year (A. D. 163) in which Polycarp suffered at be the same person as the commander called De- Smyrna (Chron. Paschale, vol. i. p. 258, ed. Paris, mochares by Dion Cassius (xlix. 2, 3) and Sueto- p. 206, ed. Venice, p. 481, ed. Bonn). He is nius (Aug. 16). called Martyr by Stephanus Gobarus the Tritheist PA'PIAS (rIairias), an early Christian writer. (Phot. Bibl. Cod. 232). That he was bishop of He is described by Irenaeus (adv. Haeres. v. 33), the Church at Pergamus, and that he is rebuked whom Jerome calls a disciple of Papias, in a pas- in the epistle to that Church in the Apocalypse sage of which Eusebius (H. E. iii. 39) has preserved (c. ii.), is a mere conjecture, founded apparently the original Greek, as "a hearer of John and a on Papias' belief in the Millennium, and on the companion of Polycarp" [POLYCARPUvS]. Irenaeus place of his martyrdom. Halloix (Illustrium Or'ienalso speaks of him as "an ancient man" (dpXai'os tal. Eccles. Scriptor. Vitae, S. Papias, c. 3) has dvep), an expression which; though ambiguous, cited, as referring to Papias of Hierapolis, a passage may be understood as implying that he was still in certain Acta B. Onesimi, which states that he living when Irenaeus wrote. It has been disputed was taken to Rome, imprisoned and tortured for whether the John referred to in the statement of some time, and then released. But there is reason Irenaeus was the Apostle John, or John the Elder, to believe that the Acta, if indeed they have any an eminent Christian of the Church at Ephesus, to foundation in truth (comp. Tillemont, M11m. vol. whom some have ascribed the book of Revelation ii. p. 298), refer to another Papias of much later (Euseb. 1. c.). Jerome repeatedly describes Papias date (Henschenius, in Acta Sanctorum, Februarii, as a hearer of the Evangelist John; probably fol- vol. iii. p. 287). He is called Saint by Jerome, lowing Irenaeus, whom he apparently understood and is commemorated by the Romish Church on as speaking of the Apostle. Eusebius also ap- the twenty-second of February. The ancient pears to have understood Irenaeus to speak of the Martyrologies, however, in many cases, assign him Apostle John, but he proceeds immediately to cite to other days. a passage from Papias himself, which indicates that Papias was a millenarian. " He says (we quote he was never personally acquainted with John the words of Eusebius, I. E. iii. 39) that there or with any of the Apostles. But it may be will be for a thousand years after the resurrection observed that the words of Papias equally exclude of the dead, a bodily reign of Christ on this earth. " the supposition of his having been personally ac,- According to Stephanus Gobarus (apud Phot. 1. c.) quainted with John the Elder; though Eusebius, he held that there would be the enjoyment of either not properly considering them, or refer- sensible food in the Kingdom of Heaven, i. e. apring to some other passage of his works now parently during Christ's millennial reign. The millost, says that he called himself a hearer of the lenarians were sometimes called, from Papias, Paelder John, as well as of Aristion, whom Papias pianists, Ila7rLavraoral. mentions in conjunction with him. Eusebius Papias wrote a work in five books, entitled Aostates also that Papias embodied in his writings y[wov icupiaice?rSy7eosv &ghCAa', Explanationunz many particulars related by Aristion and John the Sermonum Domini Libri V. The work is lost, Elder (aurTt irapao'aess), but it does not follow except a few fragments which have been preserved that he received them directly from their lips. by Irenaeus, Eusebius, Maximus Confessor, and (Euseb. I. e.) That Papias was a companion other writers, down to Theophylact and Oecuof Polycarp, his contemporary and the bishop menius. The fragments are valuable for the early of a church in the same province, Proconsular traditions which theycontain respecting the writings Asia, is likely enough; and we think it pro- of the New Testament, and which, in great degree, bable that the statement of Irenaeus (which with were derived from John the Elder. According Eusebius and Jerome we understand of John the to these traditions the Gospel of Matthew was Apostle) was only a hasty and (as Papias' own written in Hebrew, and each one interpreted words show) an erroneous inference that, as Poly- ('pU7tevoe) it as he was able; an obscure declaracarp had been a hearer of the Apostle, therefore tion which has caused much perplexity. The his companion Papias must have been one too. evangelist Mark is described as the interpreter Papias was bishop of Hierapolis, on the border of (E~piU7eUvrs) of Peter, and as writing from his dicPhrygia (Euseb. H. E. iii. 36, 39), where he was ac- tation. Papias also cited or mentioned the first quainted with the daughters of the Apostle Philip, Epistle of Peter and the first of John; and refers whohadfixed hisresidencethere,but musthave died, to the history of the woman taken in adultery conas the passage referred to above as cited by Eusebius tained in the Gospel of John, ch. viii. vs. 2, &c. shows, before Papias' time. Papias speaks of himself Several fragments of Papias were published by as devoted more to inquiries about the traditions Halloix (Illustr. Orient. Eccles. Scriptor. Vitae) respecting the Apostles and their teachings, than to Grabe (Spicilegium SS. PP. vol. i.), and MUliter

/ 1420
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 113-117 Image - Page 116 Plain Text - Page 116

About this Item

Title
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, ed. 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 116
Publication
Boston,: Little, Brown and co.,
1867.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries
Biography -- Dictionaries.
Greece -- Biography.
Rome -- Biography.

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl3129.0003.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl3129.0003.001/124

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl3129.0003.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl3129.0003.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 26, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.