A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

928 DAEDALUS. eyes and of the feet, which had been formerly closed (crui4rosa, acKE'AX (rvo-CefcqKoda, the figures of Daedalus were called utafesicOdra), and the extending of the hands, which had been formerly placed down close to the sides (KaOeueyat m Kal Tals rhAEvpeaic KEKOhX\7eFijeat, Diod. 1. c.; Suid. s. v. Auaia'Aovu roiuaera). In consequence of these improvements, the ancient writers speak of the statues of Daedalus as being distinguished by an expression of life and even of divine inspiration. (Paus. ii. 4. ~ 5; Plato, passim, and particularly lMen. p. 97, ed. Steph.; Aristot. Polit. i. 4: the last two passages seem to refer to automata, which we know to have been called Daedalian images: Aristotle mentions a wooden figure of Aphrodite, which was moved by quicksilver within it, as a work ascribed to Daedalus, de A nicm. i. 3. ~ 9: see further, Junius, Catal. Art. p. 64.) The difficult passage in Plato (Hipp. Maj. iii. 281, d.) is rightly explained by Thiersch, as being only comparative, and as meant not in disparagement of Daedalus, but in praise of the artists of Plato's time. The material in which the statues of Daedalus were made, was wood. The only exception worth noticing is ir. the passage of Pausanias (ix. 40. 8 2),raod pTe&roVos f5 N[KvwaCoIoLs] Kcal o0 r-s 'Apideaays Xopos, ou Kal "Ocr-lpos Ev 'IAciat pce'apiv VeroiraaTo, C edretpy/auoeEsvor ie r il Aec-KOd hAiov. (Comp. vii. 4. ~ 5.) The passage of Homer is in the description of the shield of Achilles (II. xviii. 590-593): 'Ev,y %opov rofictXAAe repIucAVTros 'Afeuyuvjses, T& YiceAov olv lrol r ' ei KW c cK o E~pELly AaiSaxos jrTc7eve cKaAreAoiccu co 'ApidpYsp. Now thile mention of a group of dancers as a work of Daedalus,-the material,, white stone,-the circumstance of the poet's representing Hephaestus as copying the work of a mortal artist,-and the absence of any other mention of Daedalus in Homer,-all this is, at the least, very suspicious. It cannot be explained by taking yopbv to mean a sort of dance which Daedalus invented (4oKcr-aser), for we never hear of Daedalus in connexion with dancing (Bottiger, Andeutungen, 46), and a sufficient number of examples can be produced from Homer of doaceiv meaning to make or emanmufacture. Usnless the passage be an interpolation, the best explanation is, that yoepv means simply a place fobr dancing; and, further, it is not improbable that aol8aXos may be nothing more than an epithet of Hephaestus, who is the great artist in Homer, and that the whole mythological fable in which Daedalus was personified had its origin in the misunderstanding of this very passage. At all events, the group seen by Pausanias at Cnossus, if it really was a group of sculpture, must have been the work of an artist later than the Daedalian period,, or at the very end of it. From these statements of the ancient writers it is not difficult to form some idea of the period inl the history of art which the name of Daedalus represents. The name itself, like the others which are associated with it, such as Eupalamus, implies skill. The earliest works of art, which were attributed to the gods, were called ealahaa. Passing from mythology to history, we find sculpture taking its rise in idolatry; but the earliest idols were nothing more than blocks of wood or stone, which were worshipped under the name of some gods. (Paus. DAEDALUS. vii. 22. ~ 3.) The next effort was to express the attributes of each particular divinity, which was at first done only by forming an image of the head, probably in order to denote purely intellectual attributes: hence the origin of terminal busts, and the reason for their remaining in use long after the art of sculpturing the whole figure had attained to the highest perfection. But there were some deities for the expression of whose attributes the bust was not sufficient, but the whole human figure was required. In the earliest attempts to execute such figures, wood would.naturally be selected as the material, on account of the ease of working it. They were ornamented with real drapery and bright colours. It was to such works especially, that the name SailaXha was applied, as we are informed by Pausanias (ix. 3. ~ 2), who adds, that they were so called before Daedalus was born at Athens. The accuracy and the expression of such imnages was restricted not only by the limited skill of the artist, but also, as we see so strikingly in Egyptian sculpture, by the religious laws which bound him to certain forms. The period represented by the name of Daedalus was that in which such forms were first broken through, and the attempt was made to give a natural and lifelike expression to statues, accompanied, as such a development of any branch of art always is, by a great improvement in the mechanics of art. The period when this development of art took place, and the degree of foreign influence implied in the fables about Daedalus, are very difficult questions, and cannot be discussed within the limits of this article. The ancient traditions certainly point to Egypt as the source of Grecian art. (See especially Diod. i. 97.) But, without hazarding an opinion on this point, we may refer to the Egyptian and Etruscan and earliest Greek antiquities, as giving some vague idea of what is meant by the Daedalian style of sculpture. The remains called Cyclopean give a similar notion of the Daedalian architecture. The Daedalian style of art continued to prevail and improve down to the beginning of the fifth century B. c., and the artists of that long period were called Daedalids, and claimed an actual descent from Daedalus, according to the well-known custom by which art was hereditary in certain families. This genealogy was carried down as late as the time of Socrates, who claimed to be a Daedalid. The most important of the Daedalids, besides his son Icarus, and his nephew Talus or Perdix, were Scyllis and Dipoenus, whom some made the sons of Daedalus (Paus. ii. 15. ~ 1), Endoeus of Athens (Paus. i. 26. ~ 5), Learchus of Rhegium (Paus. iii. 17. ~ 6), and Onatas of Aegina. (Paus. v. 25. ~ 7.) All these, however, lived long after the period in which Daedalus is placed. Besides Icarus, Daedalus was said to have had a son, Japyx, who founded lapygae. (Strab. vi. p. 279; Eustath. ad Dionys. Perieg. 379.) A Srjjos of the Athenian KEv\C) KeKpo'rls bore the name of AuiSaXitae. (Meurs. de Att. Pop. s. v.) Feasts called AmcsaAeta were kept in different parts of Greece. 2. Of Sicyon, a statuary in bronze, the son and disciple of Patrocles, who is mentioned by Pliny among the artists of the 95th Olympiad. Daedalus erected a trophy for the Eleians in the Altis after a victory over the Lacedaemonians in the war whichl lasted B. c. 401-399. Besides this trophy, Daedalus made several statues of athletes, and

/ 1113
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 926-930 Image - Page 928 Plain Text - Page 928

About this Item

Title
A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, ed. 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 928
Publication
Boston,: Little, Brown and co.,
1867.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries
Biography -- Dictionaries.
Greece -- Biography.
Rome -- Biography.

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl3129.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl3129.0001.001/943

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl3129.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"A Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. By various writers. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl3129.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.