Geological researches in China, Mongolia, and Japan, during the years 1862-1865.

120 APPENDIX. but associated with these are a few pinfne of different form-much more elongated and acute-scarcely differing from those of a European Jurassic species (P. lancolotus, Lind.), still the evidence of identity is much stronger in regard to the former species than the latter. From Pyiinsz' we have a fine Pecopteris, with the falcate pinnules-so characteristic of the Mesozoic species, and indeed very accurately copying the form of P. Whitbiensis, a European Jurassic species-but unfortunately the strata which contain this fossil have been much metamorphosed, the coal converted to anthracite, and the nervation of the fern has been entirely obliterated, while the outline remains distinct. Probably it will be found as difficult,-or rather as impossible, in China, as it has been in this country, to identify all the subdivisions of the Mesozoic strata discernible in Europe; yet we shall doubtless gather there new proofs of the constancy of the order of sequence in geological history, and new evidence of the stability of the foundations on which geology, as a science, rests. I have under my eye, as I write this letter, four collections of fossil plants which, though from very widely separated localities, are curiously linked together. They are:1st. Fossil plants, Cycads and Conifers, collected by myself from the gypsum formation (Triassic) at Abiquiu, New Mexico. Of this collection the most conspicuous and interesting plant is Otozamites, Macombii, N. 2d. A collection of fossil plants-Cycads and Ferns, received through Prof. Whitney from Sonora, Mexico, where they occur with coal strata and Triassic Mollusks. In this collection Otozamites, Macombii is associated with Strangerites magnifolia, Rogers, Pecopterisfalcatus, Emm, and other plants occurring abundantly in North Carolina. 3d. A collection of fossil plants-Cycads, Conifers, and Ferns, from N. Carolina and Virginia, including beside the last two mentioned, and many others which are new, several species, apparently identical with European Triassic plants-of the genera Haidingera, Gutbiera, Laccopteris, &c., and among other Cycads, Podozamites Emmonsii, N. 4. The collection made by yourself in China-Cycads and Ferns-in which one of the most distinctly marked plants is P. Emmonsii. In regard to the American localities cited above, there is, perhaps, no good reason for our withholding assent to the conclusion that the rocks furnishing the fossil plants are Triassic, but, when we remember how much difference of opinion there has been, and indeed still is, upon this subject, even in the light of large collections of fossils, we can hardly with propriety offer even a conjecture as to the precise age of the Chinese coal strata. To recapitulate-one species of Podozamites, contained in the collection is apparently identical with an American Triassic species; the other more resembles a European Jurassic plant. The Pterozamites resembles both Triassic and Jurassic species, but is identical with neither. The Pecopteris has certainly a remarkable likeness to P. Whitbienszs, which occurs both in the Liassic and Oolitic floras; and it is not yet certain that it is not also found in the Carolina and Richmond coal basins. The Sphenopteris and Hymenophyllites are altogether new, and suggest no affinities of value in this connection, while the Taxites, Equisetites, &c., are too obscure to afford us any help. Yours respectfully, J. S. NEWBERRY PTEROZAMITES SINENSIS, Newb. PLATE IX, Fig. 3." Pt. fronde pinnata, parva, pinnis linearibus patentissimis integris, sub -approximatis vel remotis, ssepe curvatis, basi integris, apice rotundatis, nervis distinctis sequalibus simplicibus, rachi longitudinaliter striata. This is a very neat and well-marked, though miniature species of Pterozamites, having the general aspect of Pt. Oeynhausianus, Goepp., but being less than half the size of that species, and the pinnee are not at all decurrent on the rachis. Perhaps of all known species Pt. linearis, of Einmons (Manual of Geol. fig. 194), from the Trias of North Carolina, most resembles this plant; but in that the pinna are much more crowded.

/ 192
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 131-135 Image - Page 132 Plain Text - Page 132

About this Item

Title
Geological researches in China, Mongolia, and Japan, during the years 1862-1865.
Author
Pumpelly, Raphael, 1837-1923.
Canvas
Page 132
Publication
[Washington,: Smithsonian institution,
1866]
Subject terms
Geology -- China
Geology -- Mongolia.
Geology -- Japan.

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ahe8439.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/ahe8439.0001.001/132

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:ahe8439.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Geological researches in China, Mongolia, and Japan, during the years 1862-1865." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/ahe8439.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 28, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.