Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
Annotations Tools
25 At Toledo the rock surface is 140 feet below the lake. An excavated trough runs southward from Lake Michigan to the north line of Iroquois county, Illinois; thence south-west through Champaign county, beyond which point it has not been traced. Its western margin is very sharply marked at Chalsworth, Livingston county, where it has a depth of 200 feet, and reaches to the Cincinnati group. Farther north its bounding walls are composed of Niagara limestone, which forms buried shoulders on the Calumet and Kankakee rivers. At Bloomington this trough acquires a depth of 230 feet, and it then contains one or more strata of carbonaceous earth, with trunks of trees supposed to represent ancient soils. Where penetrated in other localities the depth of this channel is from 75 to 200 feet, and it is filled with clay, sand, gravel, etc., (Prof. J. H. Bradley.) The rock bottoms of the troughs of the Mississippi and Missouri, near their junction or below, have never been reached, but they are many feet, perhaps some hundreds, beneath the present stream beds. The borings for oil in the vallies of the western rivers have enabled me not only to demonstrate the existence of deeply buried channels of excavation, but, ip some instances, to map them out. Oil Greek flows from 75 to 100 feet above its old channel, and that channel had sometimes vertical and even overhanging cliffs. The Beaver, at the junction of the Mahoning and Shenango, runs 150 teet above the bottom of its old trough. The Ohio, throughout its entire course, runs in a valley which has been cut nowhere less than 150 feet below the present river. The Cuyahoga enters Lake Erie at Cleveland more than 100 feet above the rock bottom of its excavated trough. The Chagrin, Vermillion, and other streams running into Lake Erie exhibit the same phenomena, and prove that the surface level of the lake must once have been at least 100 feet lower than now. At New Philadelphia the Tuscarawas is running 175 feet above its ancient bed. At Cincinnati the gravel and sand have been found to reach over 100 feet below low water mark, and the bottom of the trough has not been reached. At the junction of the Anderson with the Ohio in Indiana a well was sunk 94 feet below the level of the Ohio before rock was found (Hamilton Smith.) At Steubenville the railroad bridge across the Ohio is built on cribs, the rock bottom of the channel not being reached. One of the pieis of the St. Louis bridge was sunk in sand and gravel nearly 100 feet below the bottom of the Mississippi. The falls of the Ohio, formed by a rocky barrier across the stream, though at first sight seeming to disprove the theory of a deep, continuous channel in our western rivers, really afford no argument against it; for here, as in many other instances, the present river does not follow accurately the line of the old channel, but rklns along one side of it. At the Louisville falls the Ohio runs across a rocky point which projects from
-
Scan #1
Page 1
-
Scan #2
Page 2
-
Scan #3
Page 3
-
Scan #4
Page 4
-
Scan #5
Page 5
-
Scan #6
Page 6
-
Scan #7
Page 7
-
Scan #8
Page 8
-
Scan #9
Page 9
-
Scan #10
Page 10
-
Scan #11
Page 11
-
Scan #12
Page 12
-
Scan #13
Page 13
-
Scan #14
Page 14
-
Scan #15
Page 15
-
Scan #16
Page 16
-
Scan #17
Page 17
-
Scan #18
Page 18
-
Scan #19
Page 19
-
Scan #20
Page 20
-
Scan #21
Page 21
-
Scan #22
Page 22
-
Scan #23
Page 23
-
Scan #24
Page 24
-
Scan #25
Page 25
-
Scan #26
Page 26
-
Scan #27
Page 27
-
Scan #28
Page 28
-
Scan #29
Page 29
-
Scan #30
Page 30
-
Scan #31
Page 31
-
Scan #32
Page 32
-
Scan #33
Page 33
-
Scan #34
Page 34
-
Scan #35
Page 35
-
Scan #36
Page 36
-
Scan #37
Page 37
-
Scan #38
Page 38
-
Scan #39
Page 39
-
Scan #40
Page 40
-
Scan #41
Page 41
-
Scan #42
Page 42
-
Scan #43
Page 43
-
Scan #44
Page 44
-
Scan #45
Page 45
-
Scan #46
Page 46
-
Scan #47
Page 47
-
Scan #48
Page 48
-
Scan #49
Page 49
-
Scan #50
Page 50
-
Scan #51
Page 51
-
Scan #52
Page 52
-
Scan #53
Page 53
-
Scan #54
Page 54
-
Scan #55
Page 55
-
Scan #56
Page 56
-
Scan #57
Page 57
-
Scan #58
Page 58
-
Scan #59
Page 59
-
Scan #60
Page 60
-
Scan #61
Page 61
-
Scan #62
Page 62
-
Scan #63
Page 63
-
Scan #64
Page 64
-
Scan #65
Page 65
-
Scan #66
Page 66
-
Scan #67
Page 67
-
Scan #68
Page 68
-
Scan #69
Page 69
-
Scan #70
Page 70
-
Scan #71
Page 71
-
Scan #72
Page 72
-
Scan #73
Page 73
-
Scan #74
Page 74
-
Scan #75
Page 75
-
Scan #76
Page 76
-
Scan #77
Page 77
-
Scan #78
Page 78
-
Scan #79
Page 79
-
Scan #80
Page 80
-
Scan #81
Page 81
-
Scan #82
Page 82
-
Scan #83
Page 83
-
Scan #84
Page 84
-
Scan #85
Page 85
-
Scan #86
Page 86
-
Scan #87
Page 87
-
Scan #88
Page 88
-
Scan #89
Page 89
-
Scan #90
Page 90
-
Scan #91
Page 91
-
Scan #92
Page 92
-
Scan #93
Page 93
-
Scan #94
Page 94
-
Scan #95
Page 95
-
Scan #96
Page 96
-
Scan #97
Page 97
-
Scan #98
Page 98
-
Scan #99
Page 99
-
Scan #100
Page 100
-
Scan #101
Page 101
-
Scan #102
Page 102
-
Scan #103
Page 103
-
Scan #104
Page 104
-
Scan #105
Page 105
-
Scan #106
Page 106
-
Scan #107
Page 107
-
Scan #108
Page 108
-
Scan #109
Page 109
-
Scan #110
Page 110
-
Scan #111
Page 111
-
Scan #112
Page 112
-
Scan #113
Page 113
-
Scan #114
Page 114
-
Scan #115
Page 115
-
Scan #116
Page 116
-
Scan #117
Page 117
-
Scan #118
Page 118
-
Scan #119
Page 119
-
Scan #120
Page 120
-
Scan #121
Page 121
-
Scan #122
Page 122
-
Scan #123
Page 123
-
Scan #124
Page 124
-
Scan #125
Page 125
-
Scan #126
Page 126
-
Scan #127
Page 127
-
Scan #128
Page 128
-
Scan #129
Page 129
-
Scan #130
Page 130
-
Scan #131
Page 131
-
Scan #132
Page 132
-
Scan #133
Page 133
-
Scan #134
Page 134
-
Scan #135
Page 135
-
Scan #136
Page 136
-
Scan #137
Page 137
-
Scan #138
Page 138
-
Scan #139
Page 139
-
Scan #140
Page 140
-
Scan #141
Page 141
-
Scan #142
Page 142
-
Scan #143
Page 143
-
Scan #144
Page 144
-
Scan #145
Page 145
-
Scan #146
Page 146
-
Scan #147
Page 147
-
Scan #148
Page 148
-
Scan #149
Page 149
-
Scan #150
Page 150
-
Scan #151
Page 151
-
Scan #152
Page 152
-
Scan #153
Page 153
-
Scan #154
Page 154
-
Scan #155
Page 155
-
Scan #156
Page 156
-
Scan #157
Page 157
-
Scan #158
Page 158
-
Scan #159
Page 159
-
Scan #160
Page 160
-
Scan #161
Page 161
-
Scan #162
Page 162
-
Scan #163
Page 163
-
Scan #164
Page 164
-
Scan #165
Page 165
-
Scan #166
Page 166
-
Scan #167
Page 167
-
Scan #168
Page 168
-
Scan #169
Page 169
-
Scan #170
Page 170
-
Scan #171
Page 171
-
Scan #172
Page 172
-
Scan #173
Page 173
-
Scan #174
Page 174
-
Scan #175
Page 175
-
Scan #176
Page 176
-
Scan #177
Page 177
-
Scan #178
Page 178
-
Scan #179
Page 179
-
Scan #180
Page 180
-
Scan #181
Page 181
-
Scan #182
Page 182
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
- Author
- Geological Survey of Ohio.
- Canvas
- Page 31
- Publication
- Columbus,: Columbus printing company, state printers,
- 1870.
- Subject terms
- Geology -- Ohio.
Technical Details
- Collection
- Making of America Books
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/agm6058.0001.001/31
Rights and Permissions
These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:agm6058.0001.001
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 28, 2025.