Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
Annotations Tools
144 formation in different localities has already been noted, the limits having been given as from 5 to 50 feet. From the fact that so great variety in composition is found in these rocks, we are warranted in concluding that the Niagara strata were not originally of uniform thickness, as the beds of the previous groups seem to have been. It may be that the higher degrees of excellence in the stone were connected with a slower rate of growth. It is at all events true, that the most valuable deposits of this series in the county are, in every case, shallow. The lower beds contain but very few fossils, some circular corals, and very rarely a bivalve or chambered shell making out the list, while in higher portions of the group, the strata are frequently crowded with fossils, which differ almost entirely in species from those that are found in the lower groups. One peculiarity of these fossils is that they occur almost always as internal casts, the outer shell or investment having been.dissolved and carried away during the past conditions of the rock. One of the most noticeable of all these forms of ancient life is the large, bivalve shell-Pentamerus oblongus-known sometimes as the " deer-foot" shell, and quite frequently identified as a petrified hickory-nut. The sections of a large chambered shell, of the genus Orthocevas, are also frequently met with, and are sometimes mistaken by the ignorant for the back-bones of fishes or serpents. The area occupied by the Niagara rocks is not probably more than onehalf of that which the Clinton covers. There seems, however, no reason to doubt that both of these members of the Cliff formation were once extended over the whole surface of the county, as their present distribution can be satisfactorily explained by reference to erosive agencies that are known to have been at work upon them-agencies, some of which are still continuing their destructive tasks. By referring to the map on page 158, it will be seen that the Clinton and Niagara, in the eastern portions of the county, occur altogether in insulated masses or islands; on the ridge between the two Miamis, and all the water-courses that flow from these high grounds, have already worn their channels deep into these rocks, not unfrequently completely through them, into the underlying Blue Limestone series. There is, however, a manifest shallowing of the Cliff rocks as we go southward, the Clinton diminishing to 9 feet near the southern line of the county, apparently indicating that the Blue Limestone regions southward were, even at this early time, raised above the surface of the seas, or, in other words, that they were never covered by the limestones of the succeeding Cliff formation. IV. DRIFT, All of the formations above named are covered through almost their entire extent with the deposits of the Drift Period-miles, in some in
-
Scan #1
Page 1
-
Scan #2
Page 2
-
Scan #3
Page 3
-
Scan #4
Page 4
-
Scan #5
Page 5
-
Scan #6
Page 6
-
Scan #7
Page 7
-
Scan #8
Page 8
-
Scan #9
Page 9
-
Scan #10
Page 10
-
Scan #11
Page 11
-
Scan #12
Page 12
-
Scan #13
Page 13
-
Scan #14
Page 14
-
Scan #15
Page 15
-
Scan #16
Page 16
-
Scan #17
Page 17
-
Scan #18
Page 18
-
Scan #19
Page 19
-
Scan #20
Page 20
-
Scan #21
Page 21
-
Scan #22
Page 22
-
Scan #23
Page 23
-
Scan #24
Page 24
-
Scan #25
Page 25
-
Scan #26
Page 26
-
Scan #27
Page 27
-
Scan #28
Page 28
-
Scan #29
Page 29
-
Scan #30
Page 30
-
Scan #31
Page 31
-
Scan #32
Page 32
-
Scan #33
Page 33
-
Scan #34
Page 34
-
Scan #35
Page 35
-
Scan #36
Page 36
-
Scan #37
Page 37
-
Scan #38
Page 38
-
Scan #39
Page 39
-
Scan #40
Page 40
-
Scan #41
Page 41
-
Scan #42
Page 42
-
Scan #43
Page 43
-
Scan #44
Page 44
-
Scan #45
Page 45
-
Scan #46
Page 46
-
Scan #47
Page 47
-
Scan #48
Page 48
-
Scan #49
Page 49
-
Scan #50
Page 50
-
Scan #51
Page 51
-
Scan #52
Page 52
-
Scan #53
Page 53
-
Scan #54
Page 54
-
Scan #55
Page 55
-
Scan #56
Page 56
-
Scan #57
Page 57
-
Scan #58
Page 58
-
Scan #59
Page 59
-
Scan #60
Page 60
-
Scan #61
Page 61
-
Scan #62
Page 62
-
Scan #63
Page 63
-
Scan #64
Page 64
-
Scan #65
Page 65
-
Scan #66
Page 66
-
Scan #67
Page 67
-
Scan #68
Page 68
-
Scan #69
Page 69
-
Scan #70
Page 70
-
Scan #71
Page 71
-
Scan #72
Page 72
-
Scan #73
Page 73
-
Scan #74
Page 74
-
Scan #75
Page 75
-
Scan #76
Page 76
-
Scan #77
Page 77
-
Scan #78
Page 78
-
Scan #79
Page 79
-
Scan #80
Page 80
-
Scan #81
Page 81
-
Scan #82
Page 82
-
Scan #83
Page 83
-
Scan #84
Page 84
-
Scan #85
Page 85
-
Scan #86
Page 86
-
Scan #87
Page 87
-
Scan #88
Page 88
-
Scan #89
Page 89
-
Scan #90
Page 90
-
Scan #91
Page 91
-
Scan #92
Page 92
-
Scan #93
Page 93
-
Scan #94
Page 94
-
Scan #95
Page 95
-
Scan #96
Page 96
-
Scan #97
Page 97
-
Scan #98
Page 98
-
Scan #99
Page 99
-
Scan #100
Page 100
-
Scan #101
Page 101
-
Scan #102
Page 102
-
Scan #103
Page 103
-
Scan #104
Page 104
-
Scan #105
Page 105
-
Scan #106
Page 106
-
Scan #107
Page 107
-
Scan #108
Page 108
-
Scan #109
Page 109
-
Scan #110
Page 110
-
Scan #111
Page 111
-
Scan #112
Page 112
-
Scan #113
Page 113
-
Scan #114
Page 114
-
Scan #115
Page 115
-
Scan #116
Page 116
-
Scan #117
Page 117
-
Scan #118
Page 118
-
Scan #119
Page 119
-
Scan #120
Page 120
-
Scan #121
Page 121
-
Scan #122
Page 122
-
Scan #123
Page 123
-
Scan #124
Page 124
-
Scan #125
Page 125
-
Scan #126
Page 126
-
Scan #127
Page 127
-
Scan #128
Page 128
-
Scan #129
Page 129
-
Scan #130
Page 130
-
Scan #131
Page 131
-
Scan #132
Page 132
-
Scan #133
Page 133
-
Scan #134
Page 134
-
Scan #135
Page 135
-
Scan #136
Page 136
-
Scan #137
Page 137
-
Scan #138
Page 138
-
Scan #139
Page 139
-
Scan #140
Page 140
-
Scan #141
Page 141
-
Scan #142
Page 142
-
Scan #143
Page 143
-
Scan #144
Page 144
-
Scan #145
Page 145
-
Scan #146
Page 146
-
Scan #147
Page 147
-
Scan #148
Page 148
-
Scan #149
Page 149
-
Scan #150
Page 150
-
Scan #151
Page 151
-
Scan #152
Page 152
-
Scan #153
Page 153
-
Scan #154
Page 154
-
Scan #155
Page 155
-
Scan #156
Page 156
-
Scan #157
Page 157
-
Scan #158
Page 158
-
Scan #159
Page 159
-
Scan #160
Page 160
-
Scan #161
Page 161
-
Scan #162
Page 162
-
Scan #163
Page 163
-
Scan #164
Page 164
-
Scan #165
Page 165
-
Scan #166
Page 166
-
Scan #167
Page 167
-
Scan #168
Page 168
-
Scan #169
Page 169
-
Scan #170
Page 170
-
Scan #171
Page 171
-
Scan #172
Page 172
-
Scan #173
Page 173
-
Scan #174
Page 174
-
Scan #175
Page 175
-
Scan #176
Page 176
-
Scan #177
Page 177
-
Scan #178
Page 178
-
Scan #179
Page 179
-
Scan #180
Page 180
-
Scan #181
Page 181
-
Scan #182
Page 182
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
- Author
- Geological Survey of Ohio.
- Canvas
- Page 152
- Publication
- Columbus,: Columbus printing company, state printers,
- 1870.
- Subject terms
- Geology -- Ohio.
Technical Details
- Collection
- Making of America Books
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/agm6058.0001.001/152
Rights and Permissions
These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:agm6058.0001.001
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 28, 2025.