Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
Annotations Tools
121 measures in one place thirteen inches in thickness. A few kidneys from three to four inches thick were dug out of this layer, which were rich in iron. One of them was analyzed by Prof. Wormley, and found to contain 43.06 per cent. of metallic iron. If uncontaminated by phosphorus or sulphur-for which, as yet, no examinations have been made-this ore, if found in adequate quantity, will serve an admirable purpose for a mixture with the Lake Superior ores. Forty feet above this ore, or about fourteen feet above the upper or "Stallsmith" seam of coal, is a deposit, apparently in very large nodules, of an earthy blue carbonate of iron or siderite. On the Latta farm, near Millerstown (Perry county), the thickest nodule measured two feet in thickness. Here there was an evident slip, as the ore was imbedded in earth and not in stratified clays. At this place two or three smaller nodules of siderite, of a different lithological texture, were seen, but their true place could not be ascertained. One was five inches thick. On the Rogers farm, in the same neighborhood, the same earthy blue carbonate of iron was seen, grouped in three layers of nodules, measuring respectively thirteen inches, fourteen inches, and six inches, making in all thirty-three inches. To determine whether these nodules will prove sufficiently contiguous to constitute regular seams, will require additional excavation. As this was by far the largest development of ore seen above the horizon of the great seam of coal, samples for analysis were taken from both the Latta and Rogers farms. The sample from the Latta farm yielded, according to Prof. Wormley's analysis, 26.12 per cent. of metallic iron, and that front the Rogers farm 23.78 per cent. A limestone sometimes found in large, scattered nodules, in the yellow clays from fifteen to twenty feet above the great coal seam, on the west branch of Sunday creek, contains a small amount of iron. A sample obtained by Col. James Taylor, of New Lexington, and my assistant, Mr. Gilbert, from near the bridge on the road from Millerstown to the west branch, was analyzed for iron by Prof. Wormley, and found to contain 2.52 per cent. of iron. For the purpose of general comparison, t give from Bauerman's Metallurgy of Iron the average richness in iron of the ores used in the famous Cleveland Iron District in England. This average, for four samples from different localities, is 35.79 per cent. of metallic iron, while the average of six samples from our coal-field is 36.57 per cent. In this number I include one sample of ore taken from above the great seam of coal on Sunday creek. In freedom from the deleterious element, phosphoric acid, the Ohio ores are far superior. The Cleveland ores give an average of 1.905 per cent. of phosphoric acid, while of the five samples, thoroughly analyzed, from our coal-field, one yielded 0.18 per cent., two gave
-
Scan #1
Page 1
-
Scan #2
Page 2
-
Scan #3
Page 3
-
Scan #4
Page 4
-
Scan #5
Page 5
-
Scan #6
Page 6
-
Scan #7
Page 7
-
Scan #8
Page 8
-
Scan #9
Page 9
-
Scan #10
Page 10
-
Scan #11
Page 11
-
Scan #12
Page 12
-
Scan #13
Page 13
-
Scan #14
Page 14
-
Scan #15
Page 15
-
Scan #16
Page 16
-
Scan #17
Page 17
-
Scan #18
Page 18
-
Scan #19
Page 19
-
Scan #20
Page 20
-
Scan #21
Page 21
-
Scan #22
Page 22
-
Scan #23
Page 23
-
Scan #24
Page 24
-
Scan #25
Page 25
-
Scan #26
Page 26
-
Scan #27
Page 27
-
Scan #28
Page 28
-
Scan #29
Page 29
-
Scan #30
Page 30
-
Scan #31
Page 31
-
Scan #32
Page 32
-
Scan #33
Page 33
-
Scan #34
Page 34
-
Scan #35
Page 35
-
Scan #36
Page 36
-
Scan #37
Page 37
-
Scan #38
Page 38
-
Scan #39
Page 39
-
Scan #40
Page 40
-
Scan #41
Page 41
-
Scan #42
Page 42
-
Scan #43
Page 43
-
Scan #44
Page 44
-
Scan #45
Page 45
-
Scan #46
Page 46
-
Scan #47
Page 47
-
Scan #48
Page 48
-
Scan #49
Page 49
-
Scan #50
Page 50
-
Scan #51
Page 51
-
Scan #52
Page 52
-
Scan #53
Page 53
-
Scan #54
Page 54
-
Scan #55
Page 55
-
Scan #56
Page 56
-
Scan #57
Page 57
-
Scan #58
Page 58
-
Scan #59
Page 59
-
Scan #60
Page 60
-
Scan #61
Page 61
-
Scan #62
Page 62
-
Scan #63
Page 63
-
Scan #64
Page 64
-
Scan #65
Page 65
-
Scan #66
Page 66
-
Scan #67
Page 67
-
Scan #68
Page 68
-
Scan #69
Page 69
-
Scan #70
Page 70
-
Scan #71
Page 71
-
Scan #72
Page 72
-
Scan #73
Page 73
-
Scan #74
Page 74
-
Scan #75
Page 75
-
Scan #76
Page 76
-
Scan #77
Page 77
-
Scan #78
Page 78
-
Scan #79
Page 79
-
Scan #80
Page 80
-
Scan #81
Page 81
-
Scan #82
Page 82
-
Scan #83
Page 83
-
Scan #84
Page 84
-
Scan #85
Page 85
-
Scan #86
Page 86
-
Scan #87
Page 87
-
Scan #88
Page 88
-
Scan #89
Page 89
-
Scan #90
Page 90
-
Scan #91
Page 91
-
Scan #92
Page 92
-
Scan #93
Page 93
-
Scan #94
Page 94
-
Scan #95
Page 95
-
Scan #96
Page 96
-
Scan #97
Page 97
-
Scan #98
Page 98
-
Scan #99
Page 99
-
Scan #100
Page 100
-
Scan #101
Page 101
-
Scan #102
Page 102
-
Scan #103
Page 103
-
Scan #104
Page 104
-
Scan #105
Page 105
-
Scan #106
Page 106
-
Scan #107
Page 107
-
Scan #108
Page 108
-
Scan #109
Page 109
-
Scan #110
Page 110
-
Scan #111
Page 111
-
Scan #112
Page 112
-
Scan #113
Page 113
-
Scan #114
Page 114
-
Scan #115
Page 115
-
Scan #116
Page 116
-
Scan #117
Page 117
-
Scan #118
Page 118
-
Scan #119
Page 119
-
Scan #120
Page 120
-
Scan #121
Page 121
-
Scan #122
Page 122
-
Scan #123
Page 123
-
Scan #124
Page 124
-
Scan #125
Page 125
-
Scan #126
Page 126
-
Scan #127
Page 127
-
Scan #128
Page 128
-
Scan #129
Page 129
-
Scan #130
Page 130
-
Scan #131
Page 131
-
Scan #132
Page 132
-
Scan #133
Page 133
-
Scan #134
Page 134
-
Scan #135
Page 135
-
Scan #136
Page 136
-
Scan #137
Page 137
-
Scan #138
Page 138
-
Scan #139
Page 139
-
Scan #140
Page 140
-
Scan #141
Page 141
-
Scan #142
Page 142
-
Scan #143
Page 143
-
Scan #144
Page 144
-
Scan #145
Page 145
-
Scan #146
Page 146
-
Scan #147
Page 147
-
Scan #148
Page 148
-
Scan #149
Page 149
-
Scan #150
Page 150
-
Scan #151
Page 151
-
Scan #152
Page 152
-
Scan #153
Page 153
-
Scan #154
Page 154
-
Scan #155
Page 155
-
Scan #156
Page 156
-
Scan #157
Page 157
-
Scan #158
Page 158
-
Scan #159
Page 159
-
Scan #160
Page 160
-
Scan #161
Page 161
-
Scan #162
Page 162
-
Scan #163
Page 163
-
Scan #164
Page 164
-
Scan #165
Page 165
-
Scan #166
Page 166
-
Scan #167
Page 167
-
Scan #168
Page 168
-
Scan #169
Page 169
-
Scan #170
Page 170
-
Scan #171
Page 171
-
Scan #172
Page 172
-
Scan #173
Page 173
-
Scan #174
Page 174
-
Scan #175
Page 175
-
Scan #176
Page 176
-
Scan #177
Page 177
-
Scan #178
Page 178
-
Scan #179
Page 179
-
Scan #180
Page 180
-
Scan #181
Page 181
-
Scan #182
Page 182
Actions
About this Item
- Title
- Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist.
- Author
- Geological Survey of Ohio.
- Canvas
- Page 129
- Publication
- Columbus,: Columbus printing company, state printers,
- 1870.
- Subject terms
- Geology -- Ohio.
Technical Details
- Collection
- Making of America Books
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/agm6058.0001.001/129
Rights and Permissions
These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:agm6058.0001.001
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Part I. Report of progress in 1869, by J. S. Newberry, chief geologist. Part II. Report of progress in the second district, by E. B. Andrews, assist. geologist. Part III. Report on geology of Montgomery County, by Edward Orton, assist. geologist." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/agm6058.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 28, 2025.