Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

800 TNOMEN. NOMEN. Patrician was of secondary importance. It would was the tenth after their birth. (Aristoph. Av, seem unlikely that there was any patrician gens 922, &c.) According to some accounts a child re. existing in the year B. c. 133, or, indeed, long ceived its name as early as the seventh or even before that time, the families of which had not fifth day after its birth. [AMPlUalDom lxA.] The enjoyed the highest honours of the state many tenth day, called 5Esca'rT, however, was a festive times. The exceptions, if any, would be few. day, and friends and relations were invited to take In reading the Greek writers on Roman history, part in a sacrifice and a repast, whence the exit is useful to attend to the meaning of the political pressions 8EKdrr DueEl and 8EIcdT77rY er'tta. If terms which they use. The vvatroi of Plutarch in a court of justice proofs could be adduced that (Tib. GraccrL. 13, 20), and the 2r2AovSot,, are the a father had held the aeKcdT77, it was sufficient Nobilitas and their partisans; or as Cicero, after evidence that he had recognised the child as his he was made consul, would call them the Opti- own. (Demosth. c. Boeot. i. p. 1001, c. Boeot. ii. mates. In such passages as Dion Cassius (xxxviii. p. 1017; Isaeus, de Pyrrh. kesred. p. 60.) 2), the meaning of vvpaTOL may be collected from The fact that. every Greek had only one name the context. [G. L.] rendered it necessary to have an innumerable NODUS, in a special sense, was applied to the variety of names, and never has a nation shown following parts of dress:- I. The knot used in more taste, ingenuity, and invention in devising tying on the scarf [CsLA YVS] or other article con- them than the ancient Greeks. But however great stituting the AMICT'rs. This was often effected the number of names might be, ambiguity and conby the aid of a brooch [FIBULA], a ring, or some fusion could not be avoided; and in reading the jewel (Virg. Ane. i. 320, vi. 301, xi. 776; Claud. works of the Greeks we are not always certain (de Rapt. Pros. ii. 40); but frequently in the whether the same name in different passages or method shown in the woodcut of Diana at p. 276. writers belongs to one or to several persons. The 1I. The knot of hair (cdcpuvumos, KcpWC6\os), either Greeks themselves were aware of this, and where at the top or at the back of the head adopted by accuracy was of importance they used various both sexes in fastening their long hair, which was means to prevent mistakes. Sometimes they added turned upwards or backwards for the purpose the name of thie father in the genitive case, as (crine r1usus addecto revocare nodo, Seneca, Oedip.'AAltclaCdS s 6 KXEWLvov,. In1XEL-rodvaa 6 Havo'aviou: ii.; Virg. Aen. iv. 138; Hor. Epod. xi. 28). Ex- sometimes they added the name of the place or amples may be seen in the woodcuts at pp. 329, country in which a person was born, in the folrm of 597. III. The knot of leather worn by boys of an adjective, as ovoKva8s ils'AOnqae7os,'HpOdoros the poorer classes at Rome instead of the golden'AXlnapaoraaeis, XapsavTtir s Ilarlmtsr, AL caiapB ULLA. [J. Y.] XOS 6 Mresdavos, &c.; sometimes they added an NOMEN (bvoaa), name. 1. GREEK. The epithet to the name, expressing either the occupaGreeks,'as is well known, bore only one name (Panus. tion or profession which a person followed, or invii. 7. ~ 4), and it was one of the especial rights of dicating the school to which he belonged. Instances a father to choose the names for his children, and are of such frequent occurrence that it is superfluous to alter them if he pleased. (Demosth. c. Boeot. i. to quote any. The custom of adding the father's p. 1002, 1006, c. Miacart. p. 1075, &c.) It was name was called 7rarpoO'v o,'ojuaCieo0at. (Paus. vii. customary to give to the eldest son the name of 7. ~ 4; Xenoph. Oeconolm. 7. ~ 3.) the grandfather on his father's side. The history In common life the Greeks had yet another of Greece contains many instances of this custom, means of avoiding ambiguity, and this was the and Sositheus (ap. Demostli. c. Afacart. 1.c.) says, frequent use of nicknames, expressive of mental or " I gave to my eldest son, as is just (&)srsep Kcal bodily peculiarities and defects. Thus DemosBiKaLdV ia'r), the name of my father." (Compare thenes was from his childhood called,BdraXos. Eustath. ad II. v. 546.) What custom was generally (Aeschin. c. Timastic. pp. 139, 142; Denlosth. de followed in regard to the other children may be Coron. p. 288.) Aristophanes (Av. 1291, &c.) inferred from the same passage, for Sositheus goes mentions several names of birds which were used on to say, that he called his second son after the as nicknames; other nicknames are preserved in name of his wife's father, the third after a relation Athenaeus (vi. p. 242). of his wife, and the fourth son after his own (Compare Becker, Cliarikoes, vol. i. p. 23, &c.) grandfather on his mother's side. Mothers seem 2. ROMAN. In the earliest history of Rome also sometimes to have assumed the right of givinlg there occur persons who are designated by only the names to their children (Eurip. Ph-'loe. 58), one name, such as Romulus, Remus, and others, and it may be that, as in the case described by while there are many also who bear two names. Aristophanes (Nub. 60, &c.), sometimes a quarrel The Romans of a later age were themselves unarose between the parents, if they could not agree certain as to the legitimate number of names borne upon the name to be given to a child. A boy also by the earliest Romans; and while Varro (ap. sometimles received the name of his father, as in Val. lelax., Epitome de Nomainumn Ratione), Apthe cases of Demosthenes and Demades, or one pian (Rosa. list. Praef. 13), and others, stated similar to that of his father. Nausinicus thus that the earliest Romans used only to have one called his son Nausiphilus, and Callicrates called name, their opponents adduced a great many inhis son Callistratus. (Bickh, ad Pind. P?/ft. iv. stances in which persons had two. This question I. 265.) A similar method was sometimes adopted will perhaps be placed in a more proper light, and In the names of several brothers; thus two brothers become more satisfactorily settled, if we consider in the speech of Lysias against Dizagiton are called separately the three distinct elements of which Diodotus and Diogiton. In some cases lastly, the the Roman nation was composed in its origin, and lname of a son was a patronyimicon, formed from it will then be found that both Varro and his opthe name of the father, as Phocion, the son of ponenlts are right or wrong according as their as-'Phocos. sertions are applied to one or to all of the three The da;y on which children received their names tribes.

/ 1312
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 797-801 Image - Page 800 Plain Text - Page 800

About this Item

Title
Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 800
Publication
Boston,: C. Little, and J. Brown
1870.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl4256.0001.001/814

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl4256.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.