Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

CULPA, C ULTEAR. 37i3 kind of gayea. [GALEA.] The following'repre- negligentia, id est, non intelligere quod omnes sentation of a clldo is taken from Choul's Castra- intelligunt." (Dig. 50. tit. 16. s. 213.) If then one mze1. des Ansciens Ronzains, 1581. [A. R.] man injured the property of another by gross carelessness, he was always bound to make good the damage (damnunm praestare). Such culpa was not dolus, because there was not intention or design, but it was as bad in its consequences to the person Si %1)?%, h94W\\\ charged with it. Levis culpa is negligence of a smaller degree. He who is answerable for levis culpa, is answerable for injury caused to the property of another by some omission, which a careful person could have prevented. For instance, in the case of a ii';;tG V )____ thing lent [Comoa xATurvJ], a man must take at least as much care of it as a careful man does of i~'ll hI iii Irlis own property. There is never any culpa, if the person charged with it has done all that the most careful person could do to prevent loss or CULCITA. [LEcTUS.] damage. Levissima culpa came within the meanCU'LEUS, or CU'LLEUS, a Roman measure, ing of the term culpa in the lex Aquilia; that is, which was used for estimating the produce of vine- any injury that happened to one man's property yards. It was the largest liquid measure used by through the conduct of another, for want of such the Romans, containing 20 amphorae, or 160 conzii, care as the most careful person would take, was a that is, almost 119 gallons. (Rhem. Fann. De Pond. culpa, and therefore punishable. But the expres&c. v. 86, 87; Plin. if. N. xiv. 4; Varro, R. R. sion levissima culpa is said to occur only once in i. 2. ~ 7; Colum. iii. 3.) [P. S.] the Digest (Dig. 9. tit. 2. s. 44). CU'LEUS or CU'LLEUS, a sack used in the In the passage of Horace (Sat. ii. 2. 123.) punishment of parricides.. [LEE" CoRNELIA nDE "Post hoc ludus erat culpa potare magistra," SICARIIS.] CULI'NA. [Domus.] Bentley has the absurd emendation of " cuppa." CULPA. The general notion of dolus malus The general meaning of culpa in the Roman may be conveniently explained under this head. writers is well explained by tIasse (p. 8). There Culpa in its most general juristical sense of any is great difficulty in stating the Roman doctrine illegalact of commission or omission comprehends of dolus and culpa, and mlodern jurists are by dolus malus. But the special meaning of culpa is no means agreed on this matter. The chief essay distinct from that of dolus malus. Dolus malus is on this subject is the classical work of Hasse thls defined by Labeo (Dig. 4. tit. 3. s. 1): - " Die Cullpa des Rimischen Rechts, second edition " Dolus males est omnis calliditas, fallacia, machi- by Bethmann - Hollweg, ] 838. Hasse's view is natio ad circumveniendam, fallendum, decipienduml briefly explained in a note by Rosshirt, to his edi. alteruln adhibita." Dolus malus, therefore, has tion of Mackeldey's Lehrbuch, ~ 342 (12th ed.); reference to the evil design with which an act is but it requires a careful study of his work to comaccomplished to the injury of another; or it may prehend Ilasse's doctrine fillly, and to appreciate the be the evil design with which an act is omitted that great merits of this excellelt essay. What is stated ought to be done. The definition of Aquilius, a in this short article is necessarily incomplete, and learned jurist, the friend of Cicero and his coll::agnue may be in some respects incorrect. [G. L.] in the praetorship (de QOf: iii. 14), labours under the CULTER (probably from cello, percd lo; dim defect of the definition of Servius, which is criticised cultellus, Eng]. coulter; in southern GermanS, das by Labeo. (Dig. 4. tit. 8. s. 1.) This seems to be kolter; French, coutec2l; Greek, umXalpa, KCoxis, the Aquilius who, by the edict, gave the action of or (ayis), a knife with only one edge, which dolus malus in all cases of dolus malus where there formed a straight line. The blade was pointed was no legislative provision, and there was a justa ald its hack curved. It was used for a variety of causa. (Cic. de Nat. Deor. iii. 30.) purposes; but chiefly for killing animals either It is sometimes ccnsidered that culpa in the in the slaughter-house, or in hunting, or at the special sense may be either an act of commission altars of the gods. (Liv. iii. 48; Scribonius, or omission; and that anl act may fall short of Conelpos. 1edl. 13; Suet. A'ug. 9; Plaut. Rud. i. 2. dolus, as not coninlg within the above definition, 45; Virg. Georg. iii, 492; Ovid. Fast. i. 321.) but it may approach very near to dolus, and so be- Hence the expressions-bovel ad cultrues eoaere, come culpa dolo proxima. But the characteristic " to buy an ox for the purpose of slaughtering it" of culpa appears to be omission. It is true that (Varro, De Re Rust. ii. 5); a2e sub cultro lisquit, the damnumn which is necessary to constitute culpa " he leaves mle in a state like that of a victim dragged is often the consequence of some act; but the act to the altar" (Hor. Sat. i. 9. 74); se ad celltrum derives its culpose character rather from something locare, " to become a bestiarius" (Seneca, E1). 87). that is omitted than from what is done. From some of the passages above referred to, it Culpa then being characterised by an act of would appear that the culter was carried in a kind omission (negligentia), or omissio diligentiae, the of sheath. The priest who conducted a sacrifice question always is, how far is the person charged never killed the victim himself; but one of his with culpa bound to look after the interest of an- ministri, appointed for that purpose, who was called other, or to use diligentia. There is no such ge- either by the general name minister, or the more neral obligation, but there is such obligation in specific po1pa or cultrardius. (Suet. Cllig. 32.) A particular cases. Culpa is sometimes divided into tomb-stone of a cultrarius is still extant, and upon lata, levis, and levissima. Lata culpa " est nielia it two cultri are represented (Gruter, Inscript. vol BB 3

/ 1312
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 372-376 Image - Page 373 Plain Text - Page 373

About this Item

Title
Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 373
Publication
Boston,: C. Little, and J. Brown
1870.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl4256.0001.001/387

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl4256.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.