Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

134 ARISTOCRATIA. AIlISTOCRATIA. aries ill its simplest state, and as it was borne and I existing along with a class personally free, and impelled by human hands, without other assistance. possessed of civil rights, but excluded from the In an improved form, the ram was surrounded with exercise of the highest political functions) the goiron bands, to which rings were attached for the vernment of a class whose supremacy was founded purpose of suspending it by ropes or chains from a not on wealth merely, but on personal distinction beam fixed transversely- over it. See the lower (i7rov 1j /os'vv 7rXovTruvS77, aAXa iral apploL-riv figure in the woodcut. By this contrivance the apporuvram ras &pXas, Aristot. Pol. iv. 5. p. 127, soldiers were relieved from the necessity of sup- ed. Gittl.'H apioToKpaTLa 30fAe-am',v n7rEpox;z' porting the weight of the ram, and they could with a&rov4tel, Troo7s apliarots rv 7roAXLrcV, Ibid. p. ease give it a rapid and forcible motion backwards 128 ). That there should be an aristocracy, moreand forwards. over, it was essential that the administration of affairs should be conducted with a view to the promotion of the general interests, not for the exelusive or predominant advantage of the privileged 4J),. ~ class. (Aristot. Pol. iii. 5, p. 83, ed. GOttl.; Plat. J Polit. p. 301, a.) As soon as the government: ceased to be thus conducted, or whenever the only i title to political power in the dominant class was the,l~ —~-~ i!; \\kx1 \'tl~it 1! e possession of superior wealth, the constitution was termed an oligarchy (oiAryapXia), which, in the technical use of the term, was always looked upon as a corruption (7rap~ao'esas, Aristot. Poi. iii. 5. p. 84, ed. Gbtti.) of an aristocracy. (Comp. Plat. 1. c.; Arist. Pol. iv. 3. pp. 117, 11, ed. Gbttl. iv. 6, aplsrroKpaTrtas yap opos apeT'-r, OAhyapXias E 7rAoior ost.) In the practical application of the term aristocracy, however, the personal excellence which was held to be a necessary element was not of a higher f l i n t l kind than what, according to the deeply-seated ideas of the Greeks, was commonly hereditary in The use of this machine was further aided by families of noble birth (Plat. Milenex. p. 237, a., placing the frame in which it was suspended upon Cratyl. p. 394, a.; Aristot. Poi. iv. 6, ij y&p Eswheels, and also by constructing over it a wooden yE'VEld fO-TlV apxaos irAo'os ical &pesr. v. 1, roof, so as to form a " testudo " (XeAhvrl KtpolOppOS, e eevY5t yap ei'an &OKOO'IYV OlS v7rdpXEL rpoydveov Appian, Bell. Mlith. 73; testudo arietariae, Vitruv. x. apesri Kal 7rAoros), and in early times would 1.9), which protected the besieging party from the be the ordinary accompaniments of noble rank, defensive assaults of the besieged. Josephus, who namely, wealth, military skill, and superior edugives a description of the machine (B. J. iii. 7. ~ 19), Cation and intelligence (comp. Aristot. Pol. iv. 6, adds, that there was no tower so strong, no wall sELdOaorc KarXev'..... &porocgarias as 8a irb F2iiaXov so thick, as to resist the force of this machine, if &aoAovOeYv 7ralreiav eal ebuyEv'eav TroSs el7vropTreits blo\ws were continued long enouogh. The beam pots). It is to be noted that the word SplioToof the aries was often of great length, e. g. 80, 100, cpa'ria is never, like the English term aristocracy, or even 120 feet. The design of this was both to the name of a class, but only of a particular political act across an intervening ditch, and to enable those constitution. who worked the machine to remain in a position of On tracing the historical development of ariscomparative security. A hundred men, or even a tocratical government, we meet with a condition greater number, were sometimes employed to strike of things which may almost be called by that with the beam. name in the state of society depicted in the The aries first became an important military Homeric poems, where we already see the power engine in the hands of the Macedonians, at the of the kings limited by that of a body of princes time of Philip and Alexander the Great, though or nobles, such as would naturally arise in the init was known at a much earlier period. (Comp. fancy of society, especially among tribes in which, Thuc. ii. 76.) Vitruvius speaks (I. c.) of Polydus, from the frequency of wars, martial skill would a Thessalian, in the time of Philip, who greatly be a sure and speedy method of acquiring supeimproved the machine, and his improvements were riority. WhenI the kingly families died out, or carried out still further by Diades and Chaereas, were stripped of their peculiar privileges, the suwho served in the campaigns of Alexander the preme power naturally passed into the hands of Great. The Romans learnt from the Greeks the these princes or chieftains, who formed a body of art of building these machines, and appear to have nobles, whose descendants would of course for the employed them for the first time to any considerable most part inherit those natural, and be also alone in extent in the siege of Syracuse in the second Punic a position to secure those acquired advantages, espewar. [YHELErPOLIS.] cially warlike skill, which would fornl their title ARISTOCRA'TIA (apmoroKepaTra)5 a term to political superiority. Some aristocracies thus in common use among Greek writers on politics, arose from the natural progress of society: others though rarely employed by historians, or otherwise arose from conquest. The changes consequent on than in connection with political theories. It sig- the rise of the Hellenes, and the Thessalian, nifies literally " the government of the best men," Boeotian and Dorian conquests in Greece, estaand as used by Plato, Aristotle, Polybius, &c.. it blished pretty generally a state of things in which meant (in reference to a state where political we find the political power in the hands of a body power was not shared by the bulk of the commu- of nobles consisting chiefly or entirely of the conulity, but was in the hands of a privileged class, querors, beneath whom is a free population not

/ 1312
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 132-136 Image - Page 134 Plain Text - Page 134

About this Item

Title
Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 134
Publication
Boston,: C. Little, and J. Brown
1870.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl4256.0001.001/148

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl4256.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.