Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.

1058 STATUARIA ARS. STATUJARIA ARS. the silver tetradrachm, but whether it was so used what is of real interest is to know the causes in the flourishing times of Athens is doubtful. through which statuary, or, to use a more common [DRACHMA.] but less appropriate term, sculpture, became so It was also used in reference to weight, appa- prezeminently the art of the Greeks, that down to rently like the Hebrew shekel and the Latin pondo, this day no other nation has produced artists that in a general sense. The MINA (Pollux, ix. 6) and can compete with them, and that all look upon the the Sicilian LITRA (Pollux, iv. 24), are both called Greeks as the great masters and models for all stater. ages. Winckelmann has pointed out three great (Sestini, degli Stateri Antichli; Hussey; Wurm; causes, viz. their innate genius, their religion, and Bockh.) [P. S.] their social and political institutions; and these STATERA, a steel-yard, [LIBRA; TRU- three points, if accurately examined, will certainly TINA.] be found to have singularly co-operated in making STATI DIES. [DIES, p. 409, b.] the Greek artists what they were. There is another STATIO'NES. [CASTRA, p. 250, b.] point connected with the origin of Grecian sculpture STATIO'NES FISCI. The Fiscus was di- lwhich appears to have led some modern writers to vided into various departments, called Stationes, form erroneous opinions. The peculiar form of the according to the different revenues belonging to it. Hermae [HERMAR] has given rise to the belief (Cod. 4. tit. 31. s. 1; 10. tit. 5. s. 1.) Thus we that in the earliest statues the head only (bust) read of a Stistio XX. hereditatiuia (Orelli, Inser. was represented, and that the remaining part of n. 3332), a Statio Htereditatimu (Orelli, n. 3207; the body was expressed by a simple pillar or block. Gruter, p. 451, n. 3); a Statio Annonac. (Orelli, This view is contrary to nature as well as to hisII. 4107, 4420.) See Walter, Gesch. des Rbm. tory, for neither a nation nor a child (which in this Rechts, ~ 314. 2d ed. case may be fairly taken as a representative of a STATIO'NES MUNICIPIO'RUM. [GRAE- nation in its infancy), when they begin to exercise cOSTAsIS.] their imitative faculty, will rest satisfied with STATOR, a public servant, who attended on forming the mere head of a human being, but enthe Roman magistrates in the provinces. The deavour to produce the whole as well as they can. Statores seem to have derived their name from We may add, that no other nation presents such standing by the side of the magistrate, and thus a phenomenon in the earliest history of its arts. being at hand to execute all his commands; they The Hermae, therefore, cannot have arisen from an appear to have been chiefly employed in carrying incapability of forming a whole human figure. They letters and messages. (Cic. ad Famr. ii. 17, 19, appear rather to point to the time when the Greeks xo 21; Dig. 4. tit. 6. s. 10.) Alexander Severus began to represent their gods in a human form. To forbade the use of statores in the provinces, and give to a god the entire form of a man would have commanded that their duties should be discharged been irreverent, whereas the head was necessary, by soldiers. (Dig. 4. tit. 6. s. 10; Lamprid.,Ilex. and at the same time sufficient, to represent him Sev. 52.) as a distinct individual being and endowed with STATU LIBER. [MANUhvISSIO.] spiritual and thinking powers. The process of STATUA'RIA ARS is in its proper sense the humanizing the gods must have been preceded art of making statues or busts, whether they con- by the custom of representing them in unnatural sist of stone or metal or other materials, and forms, or such as were partly human and partly includes the art of making the various kinds of animal. The earliest images of the gods were pure reliefs (alto, basso, and mezzo relieve). The an- images (not the gods themselves), and intended to cients, accustomed to trace all their arts and express some thought or idea: now as the natural sciences to a single person, who was generally be- figure of man is only expressive of itself, the lieved to have been led to his discovery by some significant parts of two or more beings were put accidental circumstance, relate several stories to together to express the idea which men had formed account for the origin and discovery of the arts of of their gods. Such monstrous figures were repainting and statuary. (Plin. H. N. xxxv. 5 and tained as representations of some gods down to the 43; compare Quintil. x. 2. ~ 7.) But arts such as latest times. As instances of this we may menthese cannot, like those which are the necessary tion Glaucus with the tail of a fish (Philostr. Icol. result of particular local circumstances, or are in ii. 15), the Arcadian Pan with goat's feet (Hist. their origin of a complicated nature, be assigned to lVl[ythol. Bilderb. ii. p. 161, &c.), and the Demeter any particular nation or to any particular indi- of Phigaleia with the head and mane of a horse. vidual: they spring up naturally in all countries, (Paus. viii. 42. ~ 3.) Homer's silence on such and take their origin alike everywhere in the compound representations of the gods is no proof imitative faculty bf man. It is, therefore, idle talk that they did not exist in early times. when modern writers gravely repeat the stories Before proceeding to consider statuary in its about the invention of sculpture or painting, or several stages of developement, it is necessary to assign the invention of either of them to the make a few preliminary remarks respecting the Egyptians or any other nation. These arts in their materials used by the Greeks in this art. On the infant state existed among the Greeks from time whole it may be said that there is no material immemorial, and if there are any resemblances applicable to statuary which was not used by between the earliest works of Grecian art and those the Greeks. As soft clay is capable of being of Egypt, we have still no right to infer that the shaped without difficulty into any form, and is Greeks learnt them from the Egyptians, and we easily dried either by being exposed to the sun or might as well assert that the Greeks learnt their arts by being baked, we may consider this substance to from the Gauls or from the Siamese, for the works have been the earliest material of which figures of these nations too resemble those of early Greece, were made. We have a trace of this in the story, An art in its primitive state manifests itself nearly that Zeus, in his anger at Prometheus having stolen il the smle manner in all parts of the world. But the fire, ordered Hephaestus to form Pandora of

/ 1312
Pages

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 1057-1061 Image - Page 1058 Plain Text - Page 1058

About this Item

Title
Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood.
Author
Smith, William, Sir, 1813-1893.
Canvas
Page 1058
Publication
Boston,: C. Little, and J. Brown
1870.
Subject terms
Classical dictionaries

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/moa/acl4256.0001.001/1072

Rights and Permissions

These pages may be freely searched and displayed. Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. Please go to http://www.umdl.umich.edu/ for more information.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/moa:acl4256.0001.001

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Dictionary of Greek and Roman antiquities. Ed. by William Smith. Illustrated by numerous engravings on wood." In the digital collection Making of America Books. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/acl4256.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 22, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.