maize mpub9470277 in

    Intertextual Apparitions: Haunting Adam Lambert’s “Feeling Good”

    Elizabeth Gould
    University of Toronto

    Famous for unexpectedly losing the eighth season of American Idol, during which he neither confirmed nor denied his homosexuality, Adam Lambert became instantly notorious six months later when he performed his first single, “For Your Entertainment,” on the American Music Awards. After kissing a male musician on the mouth, he positioned himself as guitarist Mark Ronson and “took Bowie’s pose of fellatio one step further by getting rid of [Ronson’s] intervening guitar” (Peraino 2012, 183n56). Lambert’s acting on the song’s lyrics was shocking to the extent that it shattered his Idol-manufactured straight glam rock persona, but it was also predictable in the context of his Idol performances, particularly the only performance all season that landed him in the bottom three: his cover of “Feeling Good.” Using Philip Auslander’s (2004) approach, which begins with the performer while also examining “socio-cultural norms and conventions” (11) of musical performance and music genre, my analysis here is inflected by Alan Stanbridge’s (2004) expansive concept of musical intertextuality that both historicizes the “complex interrelation of texts and contexts” and insists on the contingency of any reading (83). I argue that Lambert’s 2009 studio recording of “Feeling Good,” haunted by his Idol on-air performance, covers Nina Simone’s 1965 “Feeling Good,” activating it as an intertextual strategy asserting queer subjectivities as lives worth living.

    Both Simone and Lambert deploy intertextuality to produce resolutely embodied subjectivities: Simone’s black, in which “thinking and feeling are as inseparable as politics and aesthetics” (Gaines 2013, 257); Lambert’s queer, in which thinking is politics and feeling is aesthetics. Situated within disparate emancipatory projects occurring at distinct historical moments in the United States, both musicians’ artistic expressions function as cultural critique in an effort to bring about sociopolitical change. While Simone’s critique as continuity confronts entrenched and enduring historical racial and gender oppression, enacting potentialities for action toward future black revolution (Gaines 2013), Lambert’s critique as citation addresses the violence of coercive and compulsory gender norms, enacting potentialities for action within a current and ongoing iterated catachresis.[1]

    Judith Butler (1993) argues in her theory of performativity that gender functions as a gestural speech act in which the gendered subject is produced as an effect of iterative performances of gender/sexuality that are compelled by pervasive norms that “precede, constrain, and exceed” the subject (234). Displacing, “resignifying, and sometimes quite emphatically breaking . . . citational chains” of these heterosexual norms enacts queer subjectivities in the present as a rejection of hierarchical kinship relations that can neither acknowledge nor account for past or present queer identifications and affiliations (Butler 2015, 64). Inasmuch as heterosexual familial inheritance effectively disappears queers (and queerness) epistemologically as well as ontologically (Gould 2012), queer is also “an effect of how we do politics” (Ahmed 2006, 177). It is performative in the Butlerian (2004) sense of producing livable lives materially embodied as lives that matter, that are grievable—literally, lives worth living. That music is integral to queer world-making is a function of long-standing historical affinities and associations of both (Brett 2004). To the extent that it expresses and produces “queer bodies, subjectivities, desires and social relations . . . in aggressively heteronormative landscapes” (Taylor 2012, 49) and in other ways and contexts—to the extent that it expresses and produces black bodies, subjectivities, desires, and social relations in virulently racist landscapes—music is intertextually mobilized by both Lambert and Simone as a “tactic of survival” in the now of queer catachresis and the future of black revolution.

    Cover Songs

    Cover songs are ubiquitous in popular music, whether performed as tribute, theft, or rejection. As rereadings of cultural texts, they are already intertextual musically and lyrically. The act of “covering” may be thought of as queer—a “temporal drag” act (Freeman 2000). Elizabeth Freeman’s concept of temporal drag refers specifically to how “the lesbian” functions as “the big drag” in queer theory, pulling—in a way that, as Sue-Ellen Case observed in 1997, “wasn’t funny anymore” (210)—hip queer politics back to a disavowed 1970s second-wave feminist past theorized in terms of “essentialized bodies, normative visions of women’s sexuality, and single-issue identity politics” (Freeman 2000, 728). Rather than conceiving the past as an obstacle to so-called progressive ways of theorizing and acting, temporal drag productively invokes, in the “movement time of collective political life” (729), a past that is not quite gone in a present that is not quite here. Covering is queer when the performer does not simply resing the original or blend into it but instead enacts a “cross-historical” practice that involves “inhabiting [the earlier] persona or body or voice . . . while self-consciously registering the performance” (Halberstam 2007, 53). This has the effect of mobilizing the cover in an iterative “complex structure of queer reproduction” (52)—what I theorize here as haunting[2] of and by intertextual apparitions.

    Judged on how well they used their voices to cover so-called canonic American popular songs, American Idol contestants relied—many might say overrelied—on vocal improvisation or “melismatic variation” to make their covers unique without deviating too far from the original or standard version. Vocal improvisation signals virtuosity outside textuality, and similar to men singing in falsetto, is associated with gendered African American singing practices. Both practices, individually as well as when taken together, operate intertextually as “a vocal, and thus embodied, symbol of blackness” (Meizel 2011, 63), making audible the racialization, genderization and sexualization of American popular music, particularly in terms of tensions associated with them.

    The Roar of the Greasepaint, the Smell of the Crowd

    Written in British music hall style, the 1964 class-based allegorical musical The Roar of the Greasepaint, the Smell of the Crowd[3] features two main characters, privileged “Sir” and downtrodden “Cocky.” Together they continuously play “The Game” of life. Sir always wins and keeps changing the rules to ensure his victory. “The Negro,” even more abject than Cocky, enters the game late and unexpectedly wins, singing “Feeling Good” as an expression of “emancipation” from how badly Cocky had treated him. Apparently inspired by The Negro’s success, Cocky presses his challenge of Sir until the two forge an alliance based on mutual interdependence.

    Greasepaint’s score remarkably produced six songs that became standards, notably “Feeling Good” and “Who Can I Turn To?” (Marshall 2016).[4] The show quickly flopped in England, however, in August 1964, which was mostly attributed to miscasting Norman Wisdom (because he was not Anthony Newley) as Cocky. Casting West Indian performer Cy Grant[5] as The Negro also might have been a problem, given that it was only a year after the West Indian community in Bristol, England—inspired by nonviolent civil rights activism in the United States[6]—led a bus boycott that forced the local Transport and General Workers Union to hire people of color (Kelly 2013). In addition, England’s economic decline during the 1960s might have kept audiences away, or at least made them unwilling to examine class-based inequity that benefited them. Regardless, US producer David Merrick saw potential in Greasepaint as a struggle between individuals and agreed to take it to Broadway—on the condition that popular musical theatre performer Anthony Newley play Cocky and well-known crooner Tony Bennett record “Who Can I Turn To?” for immediate release in the United States.[7] With African American singer Gilbert Price cast as The Negro, Merrick also took the unusual step of recording the Broadway cast album early, releasing it two months before the show’s May 16 opening. Intended to build audience interest during Greasepaint’s financially successful three-month US national tour, the album landed in stores and on radio[8] in the midst of widespread racial turmoil inspired by the US civil rights movement and just four days after what would come to be known in the United States as “Bloody Sunday.”

    During the morning of March 7, 1965, six hundred peaceful demonstrators set out to march from Selma to Montgomery, the Alabama state capital, to assert their long-denied voting rights. While crossing the Edmund Pettus Bridge, they were brutally attacked by Alabama state troopers using clubs, tear gas, and horses. Shocking news footage of the attack broadcast the same night on national television sparked outrage across the country. Within days, President Lyndon Johnson sent voting rights legislation to Congress, and on March 21, protected by a federal court order and hundreds of federalized troops of the Alabama National Guard, more than three thousand marchers departed on the four-day journey initially led by Martin Luther King Jr. Several prominent African American singers performed along the way, including Lena Horne, Harry Belafonte, and Nina Simone.[9] Her cover of “Feeling Good,” recorded in January, would be released in June.

    “Feeling Good”

    Because no recording exists of the 1964 English production of Greasepaint, Price’s “Feeling Good” on the Broadway cast album serves as the original.[10] He performs a musical theatre ballad as an African American spiritual, a singing style and music genre that was immediately identifiable to both black and white audiences in the United States as well as in England (Ward 2014). Conveying profound emotion, Price sings powerfully and with great intensity.[11] His robust baritone voice exactly exemplifies stage-based African American singing practices of the first half of the twentieth century, recalling Paul Robeson’s expansive bass voice singing “Ol’ Man River” nearly thirty years earlier in the 1936 movie Show Boat. Halfway through the bridge of “Feeling Good,” Price is accompanied by a choir of angels (Greasepaint’s young “Urchins”), leading into his triumphant exclamations, “And this old world is a new world and a bold world for me,” and later in the third verse, “I know how I feel.” He sings the final two-word refrain, “Feeling good!” in full voice, a cappella and extended out of time. Price’s phrasing, subtle use of rubato, timbral shading, and melodic embellishments express the yearning, hope, and sorrow that was—and still is—heard as a performative effect of freedom. Implications of this were underscored in August 1965, when an altercation in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles between three African American family members and LA police officers escalated into six days of rebellion—five days after Johnson had signed national voting rights legislation.[12]

    In addition to Simone, several performers covered “Feeling Good” in 1965, including Cy Grant, Sammy Davis Jr., and even John Coltrane. All are stylistic departures from the original. Grant’s and Davis’s vocal recordings exude a spare 1960s cool jazz vibe, while Simone’s is much more in the style of 1950s and ’60s recordings by female African American jazz singers, such as Ella Fitzgerald and Sarah Vaughan, who were backed by string-heavy orchestras and typically given little, if any, space in which to improvise. In this case, however, the singer is pianist Nina Simone. The seventh track on her second album with Phillips, I Put a Spell on You, Simone’s “Feeling Good” was recorded in the midst of her fierce commitment to composing songs and singing in support of black revolution. Referenced by almost every cover released since then, including Muse’s 2001 popular version, Simone’s recording serves as the standard, and to the extent that it so completely re-places without ever completely effacing Grant’s original, her cover is “irredeemably queer” (Halberstam 2011).

    Nina Simone

    First there was Eunice Waymon playing gospel music and committing her life to classical. Then there was racism. And then there was Nina Simone.
    —A. Loudermilk

    Contra to Thomas Jones (writing as A. Loudermilk 2013), I would suggest that first there was racism. Then there was Eunice Waymon, born 1933 in Tryon, North Carolina, of mixed indigenous, African, and white ancestry.[13] She played gospel from the day she climbed onto the bench of her family’s pedal organ—just before her third birthday—and played the hymn “God Be With You ’til We Meet Again” completely through, without mistakes. Then there was Eunice Waymon’s experience of racism in relationship to her piano playing. She was eleven years old when she refused to begin playing a public concert for community members (African American and white) who were funding her private classical piano lessons until her parents were returned to the front-row seats they had vacated for a white family. A decade later, she auditioned at the Curtis Institute of Music in Philadelphia and was denied admission. Then there was “Nina Simone.”

    Preparing virtually every day of her life to fulfill her dream of becoming “the first black classical pianist,” Eunice Waymon created the stage name “Nina Simone” so her mother, a devout Methodist minister for whom young Eunice had played church services and revival meetings,[14] would not know that she was performing in a bar in Atlantic City to finance piano lessons with Curtis professor Vladimir Sokhaloff. He confirmed that she should have been admitted and encouraged her to audition again. Hearing later from “white people who knew” that Curtis turned her down because she was a “very poor unknown black girl,” Simone still wondered if she had played well enough because, she observes, people never admit to racism (Simone and Cleary [1991] 2003, 42). “So you feel the shame, humiliation and anger at being just another victim of prejudice and at the same time there’s the nagging worry that maybe it isn’t that at all, maybe it’s because you’re just no good” (42–43). Within the next ten years, Simone became a rich, well-known African American artist performing a mix of mostly popular music styles—until 1963, when members of the Ku Klux Klan threw dynamite into the Birmingham, Alabama, Sixteenth Street Baptist Church, killing adolescent girls Denise McNair, Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson, and Addie Mae Collins. And then there was Nina Simone: “I suddenly realized what it was to be black in America in 1963, but it wasn’t an intellectual connection of the type Lorraine [Hansberry] had been repeating to me over and over—it came as a rush of fury, hatred and determination. In church language, the Truth entered into me and I ‘came through.’ . . . [F]or the next seven years I was driven by civil rights and the hope of black revolution. . . . My music was dedicated to a purpose more important than classical music’s pursuit of excellence; it was dedicated to the fight for freedom and the historical destiny of my people” (89, 91). Everything about performing music changed for Simone that day, including her relationship with popular music audiences who adored her but as she later observes were “too easily pleased, and [only] interested in . . . the delivery of the lyrics” (91). About eighteen months after the bombing, she recorded “Feeling Good.”

    Nina Simone’s “Feeling Good”

    Simone does not cover songs so much as she deconstructs them; with “Feeling Good,”[15] she destructs a show tune and constructs a freedom song that quickly became a jazz standard. The verses are accompanied by a distinctive four-measure, chaconne-like bass line that descends stepwise, walking the time forward in four-beat compound meter stressing beats 1 and 3. Over this, the orchestra, featuring brass and strings, plays 1960s jazz-inflected chords while Simone lightly plays closely voiced chords in even triplets in the piano’s far upper range. As she completes singing the second verse, the piano continues with steady triplets while strings swing eighth notes during a four-measure instrumental transition to the bridge, which is distinctly different in character. Without brass or incessant rhythmic drive, strings play long notes over light percussion and string bass. It is here that Simone’s voice and piano function intertextually on her terms, the best means for expressing what she knows musically and politically. Playing (again discretely) a sophisticated, introspective high right-hand melodic piano improvisation that frames and complements the lyrics,[16] she connects the piano line to her epistemological interjections, “don’t you know,” “you know,” finally telling, “Sleep in peace when day is done: that’s what I mean”—but the day she means is one of black revolution. Ontologically, the world has changed from “old” to “new” and, for Simone, “bold.” Percussion signals the brass entrance and the shift back to the descending bass line and piano triplets.

    Simone performs the last verse in the sure knowledge of how she is in the world—how she feels and what she is certain is coming. Emphatically singing in full voice “Oh, freedom is mine,” she cuts off the last word and then asserts her embodied subjectivity: “And I know how I feel.” Gesturing to cultural continuity, she sings that it is not only a “new dawn” and a “new day” but “a new long life,” expressing a future for her—and for black revolution. With the last words of the verse, “for me,” time stops, and Simone immediately initiates the revolution with a vocal improvisation while the orchestra holds an altered subdominant jazz chord rather than the expected tonic, eventually moving through four sustained chords that traverse the signature descending bass line.

    Simone’s wordless improvisation not only provides the final word, articulating her determination to sing a future revolution, but also reveals that her cover is not jazz at all. Singing deeply personal pitched utterances outside of language as well as textuality, this is not “scatting” associated with jazz, although it is deeply implicated in historical and current African American musical practices. More than simply made up on the spot, jazz scatting serves rhythmic, melodic, and harmonic functions in relation to the original tune. It creatively “follows,” or plays off and with what is pregiven, often humorously citing other tunes. Simone defined jazz in terms of black men: “To me ‘jazz’ meant a way of thinking, a way of being, and the black man in America was jazz in everything he did—in the way he walked, talked, thought and acted” and rejected categorization of herself as a jazz singer (68–69). She explained, “I didn’t like to be put in a box with other jazz singers because my musicianship was totally different, and in its own way superior. Calling me a jazz singer was a way of ignoring my musical background because I didn’t fit into white ideas of what a black performer should be. It was a racist thing: ‘If she’s black she must be a jazz singer.’ It diminished me” (69). In addition to diminishing Simone, this interpellation obscures the intratextuality of her improvisation.

    In her improvisation, using mostly open a and long e vowel sounds, syllables beginning with the plosive d soon give way to alternating nasal m and n on pitches that anticipate and set up the harmony, Simone is leading—not following—the orchestra, which is exactly why the chord changes sound inevitable. She neither scats nor interjects but sings her improvisation as interpellation, and what is at stake here is who or what is interpellated. Speaking to and with her community, Simone emerges from this extratextuality, again in full voice—“Oh, I’m feelin’ good!”—holding the last pitch without vibrato until the fade-out as the orchestra, minus piano, picks up the groove and bass line for the outro.

    But what you hear first in Simone’s “Feeling Good” is her voice, materialized as all texture and depth. Starting her cover a cappella and without introduction, Simone performs the first verse freely, out of time, pausing too long at the end of each line. You hear her thinking, feeling her way through something profoundly significant: future black revolution of racial equality in the United States. As a “private and subjective response to political events” (Berman 2004, 180), Simone’s presentation of interiority signals that her singing is not about aesthetics or beauty, although it is undeniably artistic and riveting. Almost ruminating, but with palpable anticipation, she repeats the last line, “It’s a new dawn, it’s a new day, it’s a new life for me”—extended with a short descending melisma—and moves smoothly into what is for her after every verse a four-word refrain: “And I’m feelin’ good” instead of the two-word declarative “feeling good” of the original that Price sings and both Grant and Davis cover. Simone’s embodiment of the lyric functions as an “implicit criticism” (Berman 2004) of Bricusse and Newley, moving it from English verse to African American voice, and from (operatic) Broadway stage singing to African American lived experience, the latter underscored by her dropping Price’s clearly enunciated g of the -ing suffix.

    Long before you register the move, however, you realize the abrasive insistence of her voice that grabs and holds you. Suddenly internalized, her performance carries an immediacy and intimacy that can only be felt viscerally. Once you have heard Simone’s deeply and darkly expressive voice, relentless and defiant, you can never unhear it, which is to say you can never not hear it. You can never silence it or turn away from it—from the “yearning in her voice [that] sometimes . . . sounds like mourning and sometimes rapture” (Dobie 1997, 235).

    Adam Lambert

    He’s like Marc Bolan meets Bowie, with a touch of Freddie Mercury and the sexiness of Prince.
    —Simon Fuller (in Grigoriadis 2009)

    American Idol quickly established a reputation for meanness toward contestants, despite its marketing as family entertainment. Host Ryan Seacrest’s and judge Simon Cowell’s recurring homophobic onscreen exchanges challenging each other’s heterosexuality certainly contributed to the impression that Idol “reserved . . . a special sort of meanness” for contestants who presented on “the queer end of the spectrum” (Votta 2016). While Idol purportedly avoided exploiting sexuality “for its audience potential” (Meizel 2012), it nonetheless emerged in the first season.[17] Even Lambert, who was widely regarded as having been “basically out” during season 8, waited until after the season ended to confirm his being gay in a June 2009 Rolling Stone cover story. It would be five years after Lambert’s runner-up finish before the first openly “LGBT contestant,” lesbian MK Nobilette, competed into the Top 10 during season 13 in 2014—when a straight white cisgender man won. Overall, cisgender straight white men won nine of Idol’s fifteen seasons, including seasons 5, 7 through 11, and 13 through 15, demonstrating the show’s inability to move beyond a regressive past of its own making that isolated it from progressive social and musical scenes, ultimately rendering it irrelevant (Votta 2016).

    Unable to create a compelling backstory about Lambert’s Southern California hometown or the fact that he was Jewish, the show constructed a narrative about him as a glam rocker (Meizel 2012). Not only was it plausible, given his background performing in musicals, it was also expeditious. To the extent that signifiers of glam rock, such as “flamboyant poses and aggressive sexuality” are often associated with and stereotypical of gay men, Idol producers might have hoped audiences would conflate glam with gay, enabling the show to “exploit [Lambert’s] gayness without naming it” (Draper 2012, 207).[18] Indeed, show producer Simon Fuller took up the glam narrative directly only after the season was over. Undermining that narrative, however, is that the vast majority of glam rockers were heterosexual white men who “posed” ambiguously in a variety of ways. All the glam rockers Fuller names—Bolan, who fathered a son; Bowie, who in 1983 repudiated his (false) 1970s claim of homosexuality; and even Mercury, widely understood now as gay, but who concealed that he was HIV positive and later died of AIDS—maintained long-standing relationships with women. Moreover, none of these performers, or other glam rockers in the 1970s and ’80s, contributed politically or personally to queer causes. Auditioning for Idol first with Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody” and later with Cher’s “Believe,” Lambert took up the glam rock persona enthusiastically even as he intensified its conventions and interrupted its narratives.[19]

    For the Top 5 competition week, “Rat Pack Standards,” Lambert was required to sing a song made famous by a group of American actors and singers known in the 1950s and ’60s as the “rat pack.” Instead of rat-pack member Sammy Davis Jr.’s version of “Feeling Good,” however, Lambert covered the popular—arguably glam—version recorded in 2001 by the English progressive hard (space) rock band Muse. While Muse’s version shares some affinity with Simone’s standard, it is mechanistic (Matthew Bellamy sings the second verse through a megaphone while moving robotically) and densely scored, representing a naïvely hopeful futuristic vision where people might begin a new life (MuseWiki 2014).

    Adam Lambert’s “Feeling Good”

    Lambert’s on-air cover of “Feeling Good” practically mirrors Muse’s cover in terms of accompaniment, form, and harmony and might be easily heard as a tribute.[20] In addition to beginning with a Liberace-like keyboard gesture, the intro for both versions foregrounds keyboard playing repeated triplets. Both play the distinctive single-note walking bass line during verse 1, and both use stop time after “feelin’” in the first iteration of the refrain. Both full ensembles enter powerfully on “good,” eliding the transition to the next verse; both play nearly identical transitions to the bridge, and both efface the root of the coda’s first chord to stabilize the pitch that both Bellamy and Lambert sing. Their improvisations move through the same pitches—the former untexted, the latter on the words “I’m feelin’.” Further, both singers use falsetto in the bridge, begin their falsetto improvisations in the coda on high D, and eventually move to the F above.

    Perhaps most importantly, though, Lambert takes up Bellamy’s small but significant last verse lyric change, replacing Simone’s (and Grant’s) assertion of embodied subjectivity, “Freedom is mine, and I know how I feel,” with “Freedom is mine, and you know how I feel.” For Bellamy, depending on how you read Muse’s “Feeling Good” official video,[21] this generalized you is a faceless or deformed, anonymous audience of the future. For Lambert, the generalized you is queer community produced as an effect of the performative arc he traversed through his performances on Idol. Using Idol’s misnomer glam rock to “interrupt” and “re-sound” the faux homosexuality of the former (glam) and hegemonic masculinity of the latter (rock),[22] Lambert’s song and performance choices articulate ontological potentialities of queer desire—in and for the present.

    His on-air “Feeling Good” presentation is nonintuitive and fairly ridiculous. Festooned in white shoes and an ill-fitting gangster-inspired white satin suit and tie over a black shirt, Lambert stands about midway on a tall staircase and sings the first verse tenderly, slowly, and freely. Coinciding with the last word of the refrain (“good”), he begins to lurch down the staircase awkwardly and out of time while the band, alternating splashy cymbals with brass, pounds out the descending bass line. The cumulative effect of this self-contained botched iteration of masculinity in the context of the band’s overplayed accompaniment is heterosexual drag. To the extent that “there is no original or primary gender that drag imitates . . . heterosexuality is always in the process of imitating and approximating its own phantasmatic idealization of itself—and failing” (Butler 1991, 21; original emphasis). Exposing the precariousness of heterosexuality’s infinitely repeating imitative structure, Lambert’s heterosexual drag materializes in his live performance as poignant in the first verse and emphatic in the last (the only verses he sings). In the coda, it verges on overwrought as his ascending vocal melodic sequence, like Bellamy’s, follows rather than leads the band through the four sustained chords. He holds the top pitch D powerfully for easily nine seconds and then descends an octave smoothly and precisely, outlining the dominant seventh. Time stops, and he quietly finishes the lyric “good” with the band lightly vamping, finally ending his excruciating live cover performance with a surprisingly subtle jazz chord sustained by guitar.

    Intertextual Strategies

    Forced to abandon her classical music aspirations, Simone directed her intertextual strategies toward a future black revolution situated in relationship to gender. She performed across and mixed musical genres, including classical, gospel, folk, popular, blues, jazz, cabaret, and show tunes, engaging this “combinatory textual approach” to transgress and conjoin styles compulsively and continuously (Gaines 2013). Accomplished “in a variety of musical aesthetics, genres, and traditions, black and white,” Simone claimed to prefer no particular style, creating concoctions that were simultaneously surprising and musically brilliant (Heard 2012, 1060). Indeed, Simone’s musical choices so thoroughly resisted genre and style classification that marketing her recordings and reviewing her performances was nearly impossible.

    In her remarkable 1962 live studio amalgam of the “existential love song” (Gaines 2013) “For All We Know”[23]—composed in 1934 by Tin Pan Alley, songwriter J. Fred Coots, and lyricist Sam M. Lewis and recorded by African American singers such as Dinah Washington, Abbey Lincoln, and Billie Holliday[24]—Simone plays a Bach-like invention while singing the lyrics slowly, out of time and melody, without affect. Infused by guitarist Al Schackman’s equally remarkable improvised guitar counterpoint, this performance—even more so than the 1960 recorded version (without Schackman) on the album Nina Simone and Her Friends—is unquestionably one of the most poignant and profoundly artistic examples of her combinatorial gifts. She wears a sleeveless flower-print dress and a tiny tiara in straight hair, appearing youthful yet composed and wise. The interplay of piano and guitar carries all the emotion, her voice enveloped as part of the music’s texture: “For all we know, this may only be a dream.” Certainly the most famous of her shocking juxtapositions, however, is the jaunty show tune piano accompaniment she created for her wildly provocative and antagonistic civil rights protest song “Mississippi Goddam.”

    In the aftermath of the September 1963 “bombing of the little girls in Alabama and the [June 1963] murder of Medgar Evers . . . shot to death on the steps of his [Jackson, Mississippi] home,” Simone, in a self-described murderous rage, composed in just one hour the astounding “Mississippi Goddam” (Simone and Cleary [1991] 2003, 89, 88).[25] This stunningly redefined 1960s freedom song, completely unlike anything performed by other activists such as Fannie Lou Hamer or the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee Freedom Singers, “teem[s] with a penetrating rage and sadness” even as it manages to invoke humor (Heard 2012, 1062).[26] Although most obviously associated with the piano’s parody of show tunes supporting “darkly candid lyrics” (Brooks 2011, 187)—“Oh but this whole country is full of lies / You’re all gonna die, and die like flies!”—delivered with a “Vaudevillian . . . quick and witty pitter-patter” (Gaines 2013, 253), “the actual poetics of the tune reveals deeply comic structures which play with understatement, parody, and the sharp incongruities of quotidian experiences of American life” that Simone knew firsthand only too well (Heard 2012, 1062).

    She was renowned for mesmerizingly brilliant and typically unpredictable live performances during which she changed or interpolated lyrics and rearranged or mispronounced words, inventing new stresses and variations while improvising introductions, “bridges, codas, and reprises” (Gaines 2013). Underscoring this, Danielle Heard (2012) argues that her music and performances are resonant with free jazz but “even more ‘far out’ than the free jazz cats [in that] her unique theater of invisibility distinguishes itself from any one artistic movement” (1060).[27] In the end, however, Simone’s virtuosic pianism challenged, but could not completely dislodge, the assumed masculinity of the African American jazz soloist that Simone articulated (Feldstein 2005; Monson 1995). While it might be accurate that both “jazz and masculinity—lose their shape as a result of Simone’s . . . intertextual strategy” (Gaines 2013, 264), “free jazz cats” such as Dizzy Gillespie were characterized as “unorthodox geniuses,” while Simone—(dis)reputed to be temperamental, rude, and arrogant—“was far more likely to be depicted as ‘a witch’ than as an artist with high standards” (Feldstein 2005, 1359).

    Singing with a usually rough-edged but always uniquely expressive voice that “seems to trigger grief, in the same way that certain sounds do—a fog horn, light rain on an empty lake” (Dobie 1997, 232), she “dar[ed] audiences to see and hear ‘America’ differently and on a different frequency” (Brooks 2011, 182). Indeed, the ways Simone used her voice, manipulating its distinctively fluctuating timbre, itself defying categorization, particularly in its lowest register, elides gender as well as sexuality.[28] Simone describes her voice as a “third layer, complementing the other two layers, right and left hands” of her piano (Simone and Cleary [1991] 2003, 51) in a form of intertextuality that Malik Gaines (2013) characterizes as transvocal: “Singer of diverse materials and the virtuoso soloist . . . speak[ing] complementary languages” in ways that were invariably controversial (262). The intertextual strategy that would make clear her critique talks back—not only to uncomprehending audiences, reviewers, and critics but also for a faltering future revolution.

    “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood” was composed for Simone and released in 1964 on her first album with Phillips, Broadway, Blues, Ballads. An effect of songwriter Horace Ott’s working through a marital argument, Simone was immediately “intrigued” when Ott pitched the song to her, perhaps “transmigrating” it to beatings she regularly endured from husband and manager Andy Stroud (Cohodas 2010). The recorded version is overorchestrated with lush strings, woodwinds, percussion, and the Malcolm Dodds singers, all of which nonetheless combine to “highlight the singular edge in [Simone’s] voice every time she cut through the swooning violins” as she finds “her way to the heart of the song, raw but completely without melodrama” (152, 153)—which, of course, was true of everything she sang.

    Simone performed “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood” live in London for the 1968 British television special Sound of Soul.[29] Wearing an African-like tunic and matching kerchief covering her hair, Simone’s performance voices a metadialogue of her critique as continuity—not a plea for reconciliation but an imperative to the studio and viewing audiences and a challenge for an agonizingly vanishing black revolution. Of the lyrics, she sings only the first verse and hook:

    Baby, you understand me now if sometimes you see that I’m mad
    No one can always be an angel; when everything goes wrong, you see some bad
    I’m just a soul whose intentions are good; oh lord, please don’t let me be misunderstood

    The band vamps as she continues to play and sing, freely improvising the melody and rhythm:

    Don’t let me be misunderstood; don’t let me be misunderstood
    ’Cause if I’m misunderstood all my life would have been in vain
    And lord knows I don’t want to come here again, so don’t let me be misunderstood
    Give me a clear mind
    Give me the words to say what I mean, no, no, no, no
    Don’t let me be misunderstood

    Signaling the final chord, she looks up and lifts her hands from the keyboard, turns away from the band, and looks down. Her face is fully visible to the camera, her mouth slightly open as if in midsentence. The band abruptly stops, and the studio is instantly silent. Surprised, the audience responds with scattered applause that starts to build. Simone turns quickly back to the keyboard, cutting off the applause as she vamps the introduction to the next song, assuring, “Thank you very much. I love you too.”

    By contrast, Lambert’s intertextual strategies on American Idol do not combine musical styles but interrupt and re-sound them toward materializing queer subjectivities in the present. With his heartbreaking performance of the Bee Gees’ “If I Can’t Have You,”[30] he interrupts an up-tempo disco tune and re-sounds it as a starkly personal ballad. Dressed conservatively in a gray suit and dark tie over a white shirt, he never leaves his spot on the stage, leaning slightly as he sings, persistently standing up to disco-associated homophobia. Moving seamlessly from a fully embodied high tenor voice into falsetto and back again, his delivery—unyielding in its intensity, emotion, and intimacy—refutes so-called disco diva vocal stereotypes with subtle rubatos and restrained melismas. His despair reads in the context of gay bashing (“no chance for me,” “my life would end,” “am I strong enough to see it through”), as he omits the second prechorus lyric, “to dreams that never will come true,” and produces imperatives of queer desire, without which (“I don’t want nobody”) there is no desire.

    Similarly, Lambert interrupts Steppenwolf’s ponderously serious rock anthem “Born to Be Wild,”[31] synonymous with hard rock and masculinist biker culture, and re-sounds it as a wild gay-boy play-full romp. Performed at a frenetic (by comparison) tempo, Lambert, wearing tennis shoes, skips downstage to an introduction haunted by disco, as it highlights drums instead of electric guitar. The delayed entrance of guitars and overdetermined backbeat produce a ridiculously exuberant and campy rock performance that queers the original by affectionately overplaying it without ever letting it go. Lambert’s camp rock persona juxtaposes glam guyliner with biker fingerless gloves and “tak[es] the world” in a queer “love embrace.” The specter of disco appears again when he interpellates homophobia associated with both the music genre[32] and the place where it was played[33] by changing “never wanna die” in the lyrics of “Born to Be Wild” to “never gonna die” from the lyrics of “Play That Funky Music” (which he covered earlier in the season). Deciding to “disco down,” the “boogie singer” is exhorted to “lay down the boogie and play that funky music till you die.” In this context, the firing “guns” of “Born to Be Wild” read more political than phallic,[34] rendering queer the rockers born to be wild.

    Apparitional “Feeling Good”

    Simone’s “Feeling Good” is everywhere yet nowhere. It appears—dismembered and disembodied—as the opening soundtrack to the trailer for the documentary What Happened, Miss Simone? (2015), directed by Liz Garbus, only to disappear, silent in this film aspiring to answer its title question first posed by Maya Angelou (1970) to the vividly opaque Nina Simone.[35] Never released as a single and a song Simone almost certainly never performed live, “Feeling Good” echoes endlessly—“her voice vibrates, a rich, deep thrumming under the cracked surface, . . . a motor running, running” unseen, but never unheard (Dobie 1997, 232). Perhaps “Feeling Good” is too amorphous for the exquisite excavations Simone enacted in her relentlessly improvisatory live performances. Perhaps it is too intimate, conjuring the phantom future black revolution that she dreamed but never realized with her beloved friend, African American playwright, activist, and lesbian Lorraine Hansberry, who died of cancer at thirty-four within days of Simone recording “Feeling Good.” It would be four years later in 1969, and just months after her interpellative “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood,” that she composed—with help on the lyrics from her musical director, Weldon Irvine—“To Be Young, Gifted and Black,” inspired by and dedicated to Hansberry, about whom Simone comments, “I really think that she gave it to me.”[36] An “anthem of black pride” (Feldstein, 1995), it was released as a single and became one of her biggest hits, reaching the top ten on the R&B charts.

    “Feeling Good” haunts Simone’s performance of “To Be Young, Gifted and Black” in a 1969 concert with her band in a gymnasium at Martin Luther King Jr.’s alma mater, Morehouse College in Atlanta, Georgia. Two members of the band sing the lyrics with her. During the second verse, she simultaneously summons Lorraine and interpellates Nina (3:01):

    You are young, gifted and black
    We must begin to tell our young
    There’s a world [little girl] waiting for you
    Yours is the quest that’s just begun
    So when you’re feelin’ [depressed, alienated, and] real low
    There’s a great truth that you should know
    To be young, gifted and black
    Your soul’s intact [don’t you forget it!] your soul’s intact

    The band vamps in an improvisatory section immediately after the final line, and Simone exclaims, “Oh! I’m feelin’ good now.” Continuing to play during the vamp, she muses, “Yes, yes, yes, yes” and then calls Langston Hughes and Billie Holliday, adding, “Now, of course, Lorraine is gone.” Gathering herself, she intones, “Enough, enough, enough, Nina. I feel so good!” and sways, dancing at the piano with her upper body in the rhythm, perhaps, of black revolution materializing—some forty years hence. She and the band sing one last verse:

    To be young, gifted and black
    Oh, how I long to know the truth
    There are times when I look back
    And I am haunted by my youth
    But my joy of today
    Is that we can all be proud to say
    To be young, gifted and black
    Hey! Is where it’s at!
    Is where it’s at! Is where it’s at!

    Simone jumps up to ecstatic applause, and the band continues playing as she turns and rapidly walks away from the piano, her hands up in the performative gesture of “Don’t shoot,” now associated with Black Lives Matter.

    Haunted by the phantasm of his on-air performance of failed heterosexuality, Lambert’s studio version of “Feeling Good,” with its references to both disco music and queerness, is not a tribute to Muse’s popular version but an anticover of both the music and message. It immediately disrupts the impersonal sophistication of Muse’s progressive rock by starting with keyboard bass holding D. The song’s dominant pitch begs the ensuing G minor Liberace-like flourish, followed by the keyboard triplets of the intro emphatically stomping beats 1 and 3. Further, Lambert’s studio version replaces Muse’s discrete fade at the end, with guitar holding pitches G and D, decaying in an excruciatingly slow wah-wah vibrato. Perhaps the most overt reference to disco, however, is Lambert’s complex vocal improvisation during the coda, featuring not only his versatile falsetto but the striking beauty and expressivity of his voice across its entire range.

    Heard as false and artificial, falsetto signified 1970s disco and all that allegedly was wrong with it—“excessive, synthetic, overproduced, ornamental” (François 1995, 443). In its hauntingly intimate immateriality, however, falsetto functions as both “the voice of exception, crisis, and interruption, if not intervention [and] a rhetorical deployment of difference, a staging of an otherness imposed from without by oppressive . . . gender-based structures” (François 1995, 445). Traversing an exceptionally wide range, Lambert intensifies Simone’s lyric in his solo, repeating, “I’m feelin’, I’m feelin’, I’m feelin’” on an ascending sequence that begins on D above middle C and ends in falsetto an octave higher. Gliding from there up to F, he seamlessly descends through his head and middle voices, resting on “good,” and then continues his intricate improvisation untexted. Lambert moves all the way down into his chest voice, holding precariously onto D below middle C, more than two octaves below his highest pitch. Singing now in the depths of Simone’s haunting voice—the voice triggering grief—Lambert’s fragile and rarely heard huskily embodied low tenor voice, interpellating Simone, materializes queer bodies. Singing one last “I’m feelin’,” cut off by an audibly aspirated “hah,” he finishes quietly with a short melisma on “good,” holding not the tonic pitch but B♭, the blues minor third—a tenuous, temporary possibility for just this moment.

    After-word

    In the end, “Feeling Good” was pivotal to the plot of the now “famously problematic musical” (Dorsey 2016) that critics panned in 1965[37] for taking on big questions in a musical comedy form wholly inadequate to the task. Closing in early December after a modestly successful run of 231 performances and 6 Tony nominations, Greasepaint has never been revived on Broadway. It is, however, sporadically staged in community theatre productions, two of which improbably played at virtually the same moment in May–June 2016. The Rose Compass Theater (Annapolis, Maryland) version, accompanied only by piano, mostly delivers Bricusse and Newley’s original concept with two exceptions: a young man is cast as Sir’s protégé, “The Kid,” instead of the “abrasive, androgynous young woman” (Marshall 2016) specified in the script,[38] and The Negro is renamed “The Foreigner.” Reviewer Jack Marshall (2016) finds the former change inexplicable and the latter attributable to “timidity.”

    By contrast, the Norma Terris Theatre (Chester, Connecticut) version is—with Bricusse’s blessing[39]—completely reimagined, including “new orchestrations” performed by just six instrumentalists (Arnott 2016). It is set in a postapocalyptic dystopia in which the cast, now reduced to four characters (Sir, Cocky, The Kid/The Girl, and The Negro—renamed “The Stranger”) play the game—not of life but of survival (Dorsey 2016). What is at stake here is food.[40] The Stranger’s physical appearance is racially and sexually ambiguous in an effort to honor what director Don Stephenson describes as the show’s original “brave” intent during the 1960s civil rights movement to “giv[e] voice to a disenfranchised, voiceless group” (quoted in Dorsey 2016). Portrayed by Gregory Treco, a self-described “light-skinned African American man” (Moore 2015), The Stranger is tall, ample, and imposing, wearing blondish straight long hair pulled back in an explicitly feminine manner and vivid makeup highlighted with splotches of blue, white, and red; a bit of glitter; and bright-red lipstick. The strange-ness this produces is heightened by The Stranger’s costuming: a long slit-sleeve cloak over layers of clothing and scarves. Moving about the stage with increasing energy, turning with arms spread wide, emphasizing shoulders in readily identifiable drag queen gestures, The Stranger sings with an unmistakable (male) tenor voice. In this context of mixed gender/sexuality signifiers, The Stranger is meant to present as trans. Indeed, Stephenson refers to the North Carolina bathroom law targeting trans people (Dorsey 2016), implying equivalence between transgender rights now and African American civil rights then that is impossible in a politics of representation where ambiguity stands in for lived actuality.

    Inasmuch as this purposefully deracialized/ungendered performance silences—which is to say, overcomes—Grant’s and Simone’s historically explicit racialized/gendered performances, Treco’s cover is not temporal drag, queer, or even trans. With its signifiers evacuated of meaning, The Stranger’s performance presents instead as closeted covering. Further, the production’s refusal to confront entrenched and enduring historical racial oppression for action toward future black revolution delegitimates The Stranger’s attempt to take up Lambert’s action against coercive and compulsory gender/sexuality norms within a present iterated catachresis. Misunderstanding Simone’s revolutionary call, albeit with intentions claimed to be good, The Stranger floats decontextualized, cast adrift without a past and no chance to (really) win, signifying no future in an existential void of a neoliberal forever.

    Notes

    1. “Catachrestic acts of speech . . . fail to refer or refer in the wrong way” (Butler 1993, 217).return to text

    2. Freeman (2000) observes that “the theoretical work of ‘queer performativity’ sometimes (though not always) undermines not just the essentialized body that haunts lesbian and gay identity politics, but political history—the expending of actual physical energy in less spectacular or theatrical forms of activist labor done in response to historically specific crises” (728–29; emphasis added).return to text

    3. Bricusse and Newley (1964), licensing rights owned by Tams-Witmark Music Library Inc., http://www.tamswitmark.com/shows/roar-of-greasepaint-smell-of-crowd/.return to text

    4. The other four songs are “On a Wonderful Day like Today,” “Where Would You Be Without Me?,” “The Joker,” and “Nothing Can Stop Me Now.”return to text

    5. Grant also appeared in the 1964 British documentary Freedom Road: Songs of Negro Protest, directed by Robert Fleming and Mike McKenzie, singing “Trouble” and “Hallelujah, I’m a-Travelling”; the soundtrack was released in 1964 as Freedom Road: Songs of Negro Protest, Fontana L5208, LP.return to text

    6. The West Indian activists were specifically inspired by the 1955 Montgomery, Alabama, bus boycott and Martin Luther King Jr.’s insistence on nonviolence (Kelly 2013).return to text

    7. It charted ten weeks on the Billboard Top 100 during late fall 1964.return to text

    8. It charted thirty-four weeks on the Billboard 200, beginning April 10, 1965, and peaking at fifty-four on July 31.return to text

    9. See “Nina Simone: Mississippi Goddam,” YouTube video, 1:10, posted by “Nina Simone,” February 6, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eaxFES2YXA, for an excerpt of her singing “Mississippi Goddam” during the 1965 Selma to Montgomery march, accompanied by guitarist Al Schackman. She is incongruously dressed in a sweater-vest over a white blouse and plaid skirt.return to text

    10. Responding directly to the nation’s tortured and tumultuous mood, Price’s Greasepaint stage performances of “Feeling Good” were described as “electrifying.”return to text

    11. For the Broadway cast recording, see “16 Feeling Good: The Roar of the Greasepaint, the Smell of the Crowd,” YouTube video, posted by “PuissantAlgernon,” October 6, 2011, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pulEa0cfNcw.return to text

    12. In June 2013, the US Supreme Court struck down key provisions of this act, enabling Alabama, eight other states, and numerous other counties and municipalities to enact and enforce punitive changes to their election laws without prior federal approval.return to text

    13. My biographical discussion is based on Simone’s impressionistic autobiography, I Put a Spell on You: The Autobiography of Nina Simone, coauthored by Stephen Cleary and first published in 1991.return to text

    14. Simone insists that she learned to improvise by playing gospel music, which taught her “how to shape music in response to an audience and then how to shape the mood of the audience in response to my music” (Simone and Cleary 2003/1991, 19).return to text

    15. For a recording from the album, see “Nina Simone Feeling Good,” YouTube video, posted by “Cancano Cancano,” October 20, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5Y11hwjMNs.return to text

    16. The bass line, piano triplets, and gestures from this improvisation define subsequent covers.return to text

    17. Idol allegedly forced gay first-season contestant Jim Verraros to delete his online journal, in which he was out, because his sexuality would provide him “an unfair advantage. This was Idol before social media, where they could tightly control the media leaked out about contestants. Any story outside the Idol narrative was verboten” (Votta 2016).return to text

    18. This assertion is underscored by singer Ryan Cassata’s experience with American Idol. Cassata, “who just happens to be transgender,” claimed in a YouTube video open letter that Idol casting directors, after rejecting him for season fourteen because he wasn’t “contemporary enough” and “being transgender wasn’t such a hot issue in the media like it is now,” reached out to him to audition for season fifteen in an effort to “boost their ratings.” See “American Idol: Turn Down 4 What?,” YouTube video, posted by “Ryan Cassata,” July 20, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOWFjLd-kf8.return to text

    19. See Gould (2017) for a more extensive and detailed Deleuzian analysis of twelve of Lambert’s performances on American Idol.return to text

    20. For Lambert’s on-air American Idol performance of “Feeling Good,” see “Adam Lambert Feeling Good Performance HQ,” YouTube video, posted by “mrslilianaadamjonas’s channel,” January 15, 2010, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5Y11hwjMNs.return to text

    21. See “Muse—Feeling Good (Official Music Video),” YouTube video, posted by “Across The Museiverse,” December 1, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOEZMjuoIEY.return to text

    22. Daphne Brooks (2011) similarly argues that as an “intervention in rock masculinist narratives,” Simone’s 1984 cover of “The Alabama Song” “interrupts the hedonistic boys-are-back-in-town versions of the song and instead choreographs a guerilla action that re-sounds, re-centers, that surrogates black female voices buried at the bottom of the bottom of the rock and roll archive” (193).return to text

    23. For an excerpt of the studio-recorded version broadcast August 13, 1961, on the CBS show Camera Three, see “For all we know—Live!,” YouTube video, posted by “berta berta,” September 3, 2008, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6proYaAfwtM. For information about the recording session, see “The Nina Simone Database,” http://boscarol.com/ninasimone/pages/php/show_session.php?id=nyc61A.return to text

    24. “The lyric’s suggestion that ‘tomorrow may never come,’ resonates with the tragic story of Holliday, who innovated an original African American woman’s voice, but who was physically defeated by the circumstances of which she was an object,” notes Gaines (2013, 262), connecting Simone’s performance to Billie Holliday’s 1958 version recorded on Lady in Satin, the last album released before Holliday’s death.return to text

    25. With “her propulsive [Carnegie Hall] performance, Simone brings her listeners close(r) to the voice and obstinacy coursing through her song; she delivers the sonic equivalent of AfricanAmericans’ [sic] utter discontent living under quotidian Jim Crow subjugation—dodging and countenancing hound dogs, imprisonment, and police brutality. At the same time, it is precisely this musical testimony of a visceral open wound that Simone seeks to expose, to articulate, to sing into contestation here” (Brooks 2011, 184). See “Nina Simone: Mississippi Goddam (Live in New York/Mono),” YouTube video, posted by “Gordon Paul II,” December 15, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scGVEwaUsdg.return to text

    26. Simone’s parodic adaptation of Alex Comfort’s “Go Limp” is an example of her ironic use of distinctly bawdy humor (Feldstein 2005). For a compelling discussion of “an economy of laughter” and Simone’s uses of comic figures of speech in “Mississippi Goddam,” see Heard (2012). For a short musical analysis of “Mississippi Goddam,” see Kernodle (2008).return to text

    27. For an insightful discussion of Simone’s “invisibility” in subsequent accounts of civil rights music and activism of the 1960s, see Feldstein (2005).return to text

    28. This is vividly demonstrated in a 1968 live performance in which she sings the folk song “Black Is the Colour of My True Love’s Hair” as a duet with guitarist Emile Lattimer. Her voice, husky and raw, scrapes the bottom reaches of her range and—but for its timbre—is virtually indistinguishable from his. For an extended discussion of this performance, see Gaines (2013) and “Nina Simone: Black Is the Color of My True Love’s Hair,” YouTube video, posted by “lukeslark,” March 15, 2011, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWmCbEbMmeU.return to text

    29. Smiling slightly while vamping the immediately recognizable introduction, Simone introduces “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood” by intoning, “We’re doing the requests now. We’re doing the things that we think will please you the most, at least for the next four minutes.” Furious that the Animals’ cover, released just a few months after her original in 1964, enjoyed so much airplay that it came to be mistaken as the original, she ironically adds, “As you know, the Animals had a hit with this tune. In England.” See “Nina Simone: Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood,” dailymotion video, posted by “Nina Simone,” n.d., https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x13ul6o_nina-simone-don-t-let-me-be-misunderstood_music.return to text

    30. For Lambert’s on-air American Idol performance, see “Adam Lambert If I Can’t Have You Performance,” YouTube video, posted by “mrslilianaadamjonas’s channel,” September 27, 2010, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UZ8I_jk88k.return to text

    31. For Lambert’s on-air American Idol performance, see “Adam Lambert: Born to Be Wild (HQ),” YouTube video, posted by “Club Lambert,” May 23, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYlNoCynlSU.return to text

    32. Homophobia associated with disco music was perhaps most evident in the “Disco Demolition Night,” staged in 1979 at Comiskey Park, the Chicago White Sox baseball stadium, where thousands of disco records were literally blown up during the break between a doubleheader while tens of thousands of baseball fans cheered and chanted, “Discos sucks!”return to text

    33. Homophobia associated with discos is demonstrated in the June 2016 mass killing of revelers at the Orlando, Florida, nightclub Pulse.return to text

    34. As performed in the soundtrack of the movie Easy Rider, the “Born to Be Wild” lyric is “Fire all of your guns at once and / explode into space.” See “Steppenwolf: Born to Be Wild,” YouTube video, posted by “Max Shkiv,” August 8, 2007, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMbATaj7Il8.return to text

    35. In her poetic meditation about and with Simone, Angelou (1970) suggests that Simone’s answer about “what happened” was her prodigious talent for the piano, lessons and practicing that isolated her from her family and other children, as well as performances that separated her from her only true love, a young Cherokee man back in Tryon.return to text

    36. For a video of the interview in which Simone expresses this (preceding her performance of “To Be Young, Gifted and Black”), see “Nina Simone: To Be Young, Gifted and Black,” YouTube video, 1:52, posted by “Nina Simone,” February 21, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hdVFiANBTk.return to text

    37. For a collection of review reprints, see David Suskin (1997).return to text

    38. In a musical that features a homosocial pairing of two white, cisgender, straight men as the lead couple, scripting The Kid as a woman may have been simply a pragmatic decision to add a second woman soloist to the cast. That the woman is “androgynous” may be read as Bricusse and Newley self-consciously registering gender inequities on- and offstage.return to text

    39. Newley died in 1999.return to text

    40. For excerpts of this performance, see “Highlights from Goodspeed’s The Roar of the Greasepaint, the Smell of the Crowd,” YouTube video, 1:10, posted by “Goodspeed Musicals,” June 6, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ7kCnT9_pY.return to text

    References

    • Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Angelou, Maya. (1970) 2014. “Nina Simone: High Priestess of Soul.” Reproduced in Aaron Overfield Facebook, May 30. Accessed July 26, 2016. https://www.facebook.com/notes/aaron-overfield/nina-simone-high-priestess-of-soul-by-maya-angelou-redbook-november-1970/10154171643955346/.
    • Arnott, Christopher. 2016. “Goodspeed Takes on Cult Musical, ‘Roar of the Greasepaint . . .’” Hartford Currant, May 23. Accessed November 5. http://www.courant.com/entertainment/arts-theater/hc-preview-roar-of-the-greasepaint-goodspeed-20160523-story.html.
    • Auslander, Philip. 2004. “Performance Analysis and Popular Music: A Manifesto.” Contemporary Theatre Review 14 (1): 1–13.
    • Berman, Russell A. 2004. “Sounds Familiar? Nina Simone’s Performances of Brecht/Weill Songs.” In Sound Matters: Essays on the Acoustics of Modern German Culture, edited by Nora A. Alter and Lutz Koepnick, 171–82. New York: Berghahn Books.
    • Brett, Philip. 2006. “Music, Essentialism, and the Closet.” In Queering the Pitch: The New Gay and Lesbian Musicology, 2nd ed., edited by Philip Brett, Elizabeth Wood, and Gary C. Thomas, 9–26. New York: Routledge.
    • Bricusse, Leslie, and Anthony Newley. 1964. The Roar of the Greasepaint, the Smell of the Crowd. London: Essex Music Group.
    • Brooks, Daphne A. 2011. “Nina Simone’s Triple Play.” Callaloo 34 (1): 176–97.
    • Butler, Judith. 1991. “Imitation and Gender Insubordination.” In Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories, edited by Diana Fuss, 13–31. New York: Routledge.
    • ———. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.
    • ———. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
    • ———. 2015. Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Case, Sue-Ellen. 1997. “Toward a Butch-Feminist Retro-Future.” In Cross-Purposes: Lesbians, Feminists, and the Limits of Alliance, edited by Dana Heller, 205–20. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    • Dobie, Kathy. 1997. “Midnight Train: A Teenage Story.” In Trouble Girls: The Rolling Stone Book of Women in Rock, edited by Barbara O’Dair, 225–35. New York: Random House.
    • Dorsey, Kristina. 2016. “Team Has New Take on ‘Roar of the Greasepaint’ at Terris Theater.” TheDay, A&E/Music, May 18. Accessed November 4. http://www.theday.com/article/20160518/ENT10/160519244.
    • Draper, Jimmy. 2012. “Idol Speculation: Queer Identity and a Media-Imposed Lens of Detection.” Popular Communication: The International Journal of Media and Culture 10 (3): 201–16.
    • Feldstein, Ruth. 2005. “‘I Don’t Trust You Anymore’: Nina Simone, Culture, and Black Activism in the 1960s.” Journal of American History 91 (4): 1349–79.
    • François, Anne-Lise. 1995. “Fakin’ It/Makin’ It: Falsetto’s Bid for Transcendence in 1970s Disco.” Perspectives of New Music 33 (1/2): 442–57.
    • Freeman, Elizabeth. 2000. “Packing History, Count(er)ing Generations.” New Literary History 31 (4): 727–44.
    • Gaines, Malik. 2013. “The Quadruple-Consciousness of Nina Simone.” Women & Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 23 (2): 248–67.
    • Gould, Elizabeth. 2017. “Queer Transversal: The Spectacle Adam Lambert.” In Musical Encounters with Deleuze and Guattari, edited by Pirrko Moisala, Taru Leppänen, Milla Tianinen, and Hannah Vaatainen, 128–57. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    • Grigoriadis, Vanessa. 2009. “Wild Idol.” Rolling Stone, RS1081: 50–57.
    • Halberstam, Judith. 2007. “Theorizing Gender, Culture, and Music: Keeping Time with Lesbians on Ecstasy.” Women & Music 11: 51–58.
    • Heard, Danielle C. 2012. “‘Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood’: Nina Simone’s Theater of Invisibility.” Callaloo 35 (4): 1056–84.
    • Kelly, Jon. 2013. “What Was behind the Bristol Bus Boycott?” BBC News, August 27. Accessed October 18, 2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-23795655.
    • Kernodle, Tammy L. 2008. “‘I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel to Be Free’: Nina Simone and the Redefining of the Freedom Song of the 1960s.” Journal of the Society for American Music 2 (3): 296–317.
    • Loudermilk, A. 2013. “Nina Simone & the Civil Rights Movement: Protest at Her Piano, Audience at Her Feet.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 14 (3): 121–36.
    • Marshall, Jack. 2016. Review of The Roar of the Greasepaint—the Smell of the Crowd, by Leslie Bricusse and Anthony Newley. DC Theatre Scene, May 9. Accessed November 4. http://dctheatrescene.com/2016/05/09/roar-greasepaint-smell-crowd-compass-rose-review/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=email_this&utm_source=email.
    • Meizel, Katherine. 2011. Idolized: Music, Media, and Identity in “American Idol.” Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    • Moore, John. 2015. “Meet the Cast Video Series: Gregory Treco.” DCPA Newscenter, April 19. Accessed November 4, 2016. http://www.denvercenter.org/blog-posts/news-center/2015/04/19/meet-the-cast-video-series-gregory-treco.
    • MuseWiki. 2014. “Feeling Good.” Blog, last modified April 20. http://www.musewiki.org/Feeling_Good_(song)#cite_note-4.
    • Peraino, Judith. 2012. “Plumbing the Surface of Sound and Vision: David Bowie, Andy Warhol, and the Art of Posing.” Qui Parle 21 (1), 151–84.
    • Simone, Nina, with Stephen Cleary. (1991) 2003. I Put a Spell on You: The Autobiography of Nina Simone. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
    • Stanbridge, Alan. 2004. “A Question of Standards: ‘My Funny Valentine’ and Musical Intertextuality.” Popular Music History 1 (1), 83–108.
    • Suskin, Steven. 1997. More Opening Nights on Broadway: A Critical Quotebook of the Musical Theatre 1965–1981. New York: Schirmer Books.
    • Taylor, Jodie. 2012. Playing It Queer: Popular Music, Identity and Queer World-Making. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
    • Votta, Rae. 2016. “Why LGBT Performers Never Won ‘American Idol.’” Rolling Stone, April 4. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/why-lgbt-performers-never-won-american-idol-20160404.
    • Ward, Brian. 2014. “Music, Musical Theater, and the Imagined South in Interwar Britain.” Journal of Southern History 80 (1), 39–72.