To William S. Rosecrans1Jump to section
Nashville, Tenn. May 20, 1863. [9:50 A.M.]
Yours of yesterday in relation to Col. Haggard is received. I am anxious that you shall not misunderstand me. In no case have I intended to censure you, or to question your ability. In Col. Haggard's case I meant no more than to suggest that possibly you might have been mistaken, in a point that could be corrected. I frequently make mistakes myself, in the many things I am compelled to do hastily. A. LINCOLN
Annotation
[1] ALS, RPB. Rosecrans' telegram of May 19 is as follows: ``The autograph letter of your Excellency dated May first . . . respecting the case of Col. David R. Haggard has just been handed me by the colonel. It seems to me . . . that my action . . . is not properly understood. My duty as comdr of troops is to see that they are kept at their maximum of efficiency . . . officers exist only to effect this . . . this duty is just recognized . . . by Genl Order Number one hundred war Dept. of 1862 which requires . . . commanders to report all officers who by reason of ill health or other cause have been absent from duty over sixty days. This was Col. Haggard's case when I assumed the command of this Dept. but he was in ill health when I saw him. He continued in ill health & absent . . . more than sixty days & I reported the facts to the War Dept. . . . the War Dept. dismissed him instead of mustering him out . . . now the Col. appears here & has not a doubt of his health & physical ability to command his Regiment. . . . His former place has not as yet been filled. . . . I have no objection whatever to the revocation of the order whereby