Dear Sir: June 10. 1853.
We have had Dr. Higgins'2Open page [ca]se under consideration; and, inasmuch as, by the [law] ``he shall be subject to removal only
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder. If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
We have had Dr. Higgins'2Open page [ca]se under consideration; and, inasmuch as, by the [law] ``he shall be subject to removal only
for infi[delity to] the trust reposed in him, or incompetency [in] the discharge thereof''---we think the resolution [o]f removal, not placing the removal on either [of] these grounds, is, on it's face void; and we further think, that any removal, without giving the Dr. a chance to be heard in his defence, on the questions, of infidelity and incompetency, one or both, will be void. Quo warranto, we think, is the way; [an]d we think it some better that he should [h]old on, and leave his adversaries to proceed; but if his holding on would embarrass the institution, he might, without much disadvantage, leave, and commence the proceedings himself. Yours &c.
A LINCOLN
S T LOGAN